Competition for publication-based rewards
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112017
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Emeric Henry, 2009.
"Strategic Disclosure of Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(539), pages 1036-1064, July.
- Emeric Henry, 2009. "Strategic Disclosure of Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(539), pages 1036-1064, July.
- Emeric Henry, 2009. "Strategic Disclosure of Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty," Post-Print hal-03417703, HAL.
- Emir Kamenica & Matthew Gentzkow, 2011.
"Bayesian Persuasion,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(6), pages 2590-2615, October.
- Emir Kamenica & Matthew Gentzkow, 2009. "Bayesian Persuasion," NBER Working Papers 15540, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Emir Kamenica & Matthew Gentzkow, 2009. "Bayesian Persuasion," NajEcon Working Paper Reviews 814577000000000369, www.najecon.org.
- Isabelle Brocas & Juan D. Carrillo, 2007. "Influence through ignorance," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 38(4), pages 931-947, December.
- Mike Felgenhauer & Fangya Xu, 2021. "The Face Value Of Arguments With And Without Manipulation," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(1), pages 277-293, February.
- Taylor, Curtis R, 1995. "Digging for Golden Carrots: An Analysis of Research Tournaments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(4), pages 872-890, September.
- Alexander Frankel & Maximilian Kasy, 2022.
"Which Findings Should Be Published?,"
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38, February.
- Kasy, Maximilian & Frankel, Alexander, 2018. "Which findings should be published?," MetaArXiv mbvz3, Center for Open Science.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Felgenhauer, Mike, 2021. "Experimentation and manipulation with preregistration," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 400-408.
- Gregor Martin, 2015. "To Invite or Not to Invite a Lobby, That Is the Question," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 143-166, July.
- Martin Gregor, 2014. "Receiver's access fee for a single sender," Working Papers IES 2014/17, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised May 2014.
- Hedlund, Jonas, 2017. "Bayesian persuasion by a privately informed sender," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 229-268.
- Alfredo Di Tillio & Marco Ottaviani & Peter Norman Sørensen, 2017.
"Persuasion Bias in Science: Can Economics Help?,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(605), pages 266-304, October.
- Ottaviani, Marco & Di Tillio, Alfredo & Sørensen, Peter Norman, 2016. "Persuasion Bias in Science: Can Economics Help?," CEPR Discussion Papers 11343, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Raphael Boleslavsky & Christopher Cotton, 2018.
"Limited capacity in project selection: competition through evidence production,"
Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(2), pages 385-421, March.
- Christopher Cotton & Raphael Boleslavsky, 2015. "Limited Capacity In Project Selection: Competition Through Evidence Production," Working Paper 1343, Economics Department, Queen's University.
- Vasudha Jain & Mark Whitmeyer, 2021. "Whose Bias?," Papers 2111.10335, arXiv.org.
- Thomas Mariotti & Nikolaus Schweizer & Nora Szech & Jonas von Wangenheim, 2023.
"Information Nudges and Self-Control,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2182-2197, April.
- Mariotti, Thomas & Schweizer, Nikolaus & Szech, Nora & von Wangenheim, Jonas, 2018. "Information Nudges and Self Control," TSE Working Papers 18-914, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Jun 2021.
- Mariotti, Thomas & Schweizer, Nikolaus & Szech, Nora & von Wangenheim, Jonas, 2018. "Information Nudges and Self-Control," CEPR Discussion Papers 13299, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Mariotti, Thomas & Schweizer, Nikolaus & Szech, Nora & von Wangenheim, Jonas, 2018. "Information nudges and self-control," Working Paper Series in Economics 119, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
- Thomas Mariotti & Nikolaus Schweizer & Nora Szech & Jonas von Wangenheim, 2023. "Information nudges and self control," Post-Print hal-04198487, HAL.
- Thomas Mariotti & Nikolaus Schweizer & Nora Szech & Jonas von Wangenheim, 2018. "Information Nudges and Self-Control," CESifo Working Paper Series 7346, CESifo.
- Mariotti, Thomas & Schweizer, Nikolaus & Szech, Nora & von Wangenheim, Jonas, 2018. "Information Nudges and Self Control," IAST Working Papers 18-84, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST), revised Jun 2021.
- Thomas Mariotti & Nikolaus Schweizer & Nora Szech & Jonas von Wangenheim, 2021. "Information Nudges and Self-Control," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_311, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Mariotti, Thomas & Schweizer, Nikolaus & Szech, Nora & von Wangenheim, Jonas, 2018. "Information nudges and self-control," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2018-304, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
- Thomas Mariotti & Nikolaus Schweizer & Nora Szech & Jonas von Wangenheim, 2022. "Information nudges and self control," Working Papers hal-03629566, HAL.
- Emeric Henry & Marco Ottaviani, 2019.
"Research and the Approval Process: The Organization of Persuasion,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(3), pages 911-955, March.
- Ottaviani, Marco, 2017. "Research and the Approval Process: The Organization of Persuasion," CEPR Discussion Papers 11939, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Emeric Henry & Marco Ottaviani, 2019. "Research and the Approval Process: the Organization of Persuasion," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03391894, HAL.
- Emeric Henry & Marco Ottaviani, 2019. "Research and the Approval Process: the Organization of Persuasion," Post-Print hal-03391894, HAL.
- Vladimir Asriyan & Dana Foarta & Victoria Vanasco, 2023.
"The Good, the Bad, and the Complex: Product Design with Imperfect Information,"
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 187-226, May.
- Asriyan, Vladimir & Foarta, Dana & Vanasco, Victoria, 2018. "Strategic Complexity When Seeking Approval," Research Papers 3615, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
- Asriyan, Vladimir & Foarta, Dana & Vanasco, Victoria, 2020. "The Good, the Bad and the Complex: Product Design with Impeperfect Information," Research Papers 3885, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
- Vanasco, Victoria & Asriyan, Vladimir & Foarta, Dana, 2020. "The good, the bad, and the complex: product design with asymmetric information," CEPR Discussion Papers 14307, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Vladimir Asriyan & Dana Foarta & Victoria Vanasco, 2019. "The good, the bad and the complex: Product design with imperfect information," Economics Working Papers 1643, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Sep 2021.
- Vladimir Asriyan & Dana Foarta & Victoria Vanasco, 2021. "The Good, the Bad and the Complex: Product Design with Imperfect Information," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 21155, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
- Dana Foarta & Victoria Vanasco & Vladimir Asriyan, 2019. "The Good, The Bad and The Complex: Product Design with Imperfect Information," Working Papers 1079, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Martin Gregor, 2011. "Corporate lobbying: A review of the recent literature," Working Papers IES 2011/32, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Nov 2011.
- Raphael Boleslavsky & Christopher Cotton, 2011.
"Learning more by doing less,"
Working Papers
2012-1, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
- Ralph Boleslavsky & Christopher Cotton, 2011. "Learning More by Doing Less," Working Papers 2011-6, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
- Isaiah Andrews & Jesse M. Shapiro, 2021.
"A Model of Scientific Communication,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(5), pages 2117-2142, September.
- Isaiah Andrews & Jesse M. Shapiro, 2020. "A Model of Scientific Communication," NBER Working Papers 26824, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Brocas, Isabelle & Carrillo, Juan D., 2020. "The development of social strategic ignorance and other regarding behavior from childhood to adulthood," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
- Daniel Stone, 2011. "A signal-jamming model of persuasion: interest group funded policy research," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 37(3), pages 397-424, September.
- Chan, Jimmy & Gupta, Seher & Li, Fei & Wang, Yun, 2019.
"Pivotal persuasion,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 178-202.
- Jimmy Chan & Seher Gupta & Fei Li & Yun Wang, 2018. "Pivotal Persuasion," Working Papers 2018-11-03, Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE), Xiamen University.
- Tsakas, Elias & Tsakas, Nikolas, 2021.
"Noisy persuasion,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 44-61.
- Elias Tsakas & Nikolas Tsakas, 2018. "Noisy Persuasion," University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics 11-2018, University of Cyprus Department of Economics.
- Christian Salas, 2019. "Persuading policy-makers," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(4), pages 507-542, October.
- Davide Viviano & Kaspar Wuthrich & Paul Niehaus, 2021. "A model of multiple hypothesis testing," Papers 2104.13367, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
- Kolotilin, Anton, 2015.
"Experimental design to persuade,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 215-226.
- Anton Kolotilin, 2013. "Experimental Design to Persuade," Discussion Papers 2013-17, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
More about this item
Keywords
Experimentation; Persuasion; Manipulation; Information acquisition;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
- D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:244:y:2024:i:c:s0165176524005019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.