IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v162y2018icp93-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust maximum entropy test for GARCH models based on a minimum density power divergence estimator

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Byungsoo

Abstract

The maximum entropy test, as designed for examining goodness-of-fit with a non-robust estimator such as the maximum likelihood estimator, can suffer from severe size distortions when the data are contaminated by outliers. The objective of this study is to develop a robust maximum entropy test for the normality of GARCH models. We construct the test statistic based on the minimum density power divergence estimator and verify its limiting null distribution. A bootstrap method is also discussed, and its performance is evaluated through simulations. According to the simulation results, the proposed test can successfully achieve reasonable sizes in the presence of outliers.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Byungsoo, 2018. "Robust maximum entropy test for GARCH models based on a minimum density power divergence estimator," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 93-97.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:162:y:2018:i:c:p:93-97
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.11.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176517304573
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.11.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Byungsoo & Lee, Sangyeol, 2013. "Robust estimation for the covariance matrix of multivariate time series based on normal mixtures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 125-140.
    2. Sangyeol Lee & Junmo Song, 2009. "Minimum density power divergence estimator for GARCH models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 316-341, August.
    3. Jushan Bai, 2003. "Testing Parametric Conditional Distributions of Dynamic Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 85(3), pages 531-549, August.
    4. Winfried Stute & Wenceslao Manteiga & Manuel Quindimil, 1993. "Bootstrap based goodness-of-fit-tests," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 243-256, December.
    5. Lee, Sangyeol & Vonta, Ilia & Karagrigoriou, Alex, 2011. "A maximum entropy type test of fit," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 2635-2643, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Sangyeol & Oh, Haejune, 2015. "Entropy test and residual empirical process for autoregressive conditional duration models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Lee, Sangyeol, 2014. "Goodness of fit test for discrete random variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 92-100.
    3. Kheifets, Igor & Velasco, Carlos, 2017. "New goodness-of-fit diagnostics for conditional discrete response models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 135-149.
    4. Byungsoo Kim & Sangyeol Lee, 2020. "Robust estimation for general integer-valued time series models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(6), pages 1371-1396, December.
    5. Lee, Sangyeol, 2013. "A maximum entropy type test of fit: Composite hypothesis case," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 59-67.
    6. Song, Junmo & Oh, Dong-hyun & Kang, Jiwon, 2017. "Robust estimation in stochastic frontier models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 243-267.
    7. Ghoudi, Kilani & Rémillard, Bruno, 2014. "Comparison of specification tests for GARCH models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 291-300.
    8. Thomas Gkelsinis & Alex Karagrigoriou, 2020. "Theoretical Aspects on Measures of Directed Information with Simulations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Juan Carlos Escanciano & Zaichao Du, 2015. "Backtesting Expected Shortfall: Accounting for Tail Risk," CAEPR Working Papers 2015-001, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    10. Juan Mora & Antonia Febrer, 2005. "Wage Distribution In Spain, 1994-1999: An Application Of A Flexible Estimator Of Conditional Distributions," Working Papers. Serie EC 2005-04, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    11. Corradi, Valentina & Swanson, Norman R., 2004. "A test for the distributional comparison of simulated and historical data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 185-193, November.
    12. Corradi, Valentina & Swanson, Norman R., 2004. "Some recent developments in predictive accuracy testing with nested models and (generic) nonlinear alternatives," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 185-199.
    13. Hall, Stephen G. & Mitchell, James, 2007. "Combining density forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-13.
    14. González-Rivera, Gloria & Yoldas, Emre, 2012. "Autocontour-based evaluation of multivariate predictive densities," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 328-342.
    15. González-Rivera, Gloria & Veiga, Helena, 2016. "A Bootstrap Approach for Generalized Autocontour Testing," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 23457, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    16. Corradi, Valentina & Swanson, Norman R., 2005. "Bootstrap specification tests for diffusion processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 117-148, January.
    17. Andreou, E. & Werker, B.J.M., 2003. "A Simple Asymptotic Analysis of Residual-Based Statistics," Other publications TiSEM 9fe68e51-a026-4660-b6e7-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Isao Ishida, 2005. "Scanning Multivariate Conditional Densities with Probability Integral Transforms," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-369, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    19. Gabriele Fiorentini & Enrique Sentana, 2021. "Specification tests for non‐Gaussian maximum likelihood estimators," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 683-742, July.
    20. Arthur Pewsey, 2018. "Parametric bootstrap edf-based goodness-of-fit testing for sinh–arcsinh distributions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(1), pages 147-172, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Entropy-based goodness-of-fit test; Normality test; GARCH models; Minimum density power divergence estimator; Parametric bootstrap method;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:162:y:2018:i:c:p:93-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.