IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v135y2015icp34-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A modified test against spurious long memory

Author

Listed:
  • Kruse, Robinson

Abstract

This paper considers the situation where a time series is composed of a fractionally integrated component with long memory parameter d∈(−1/2;1/2) and some contamination in the form of level shifts or trends. The test against spurious long memory by Qu (2011) is consistent in this case as the standard local Whittle estimator for unknown d is upward biased. As demonstrated in this work, the power can be improved by removing the fractional component from the series prior to application of the test. This task can be accomplished by using the modified local Whittle approach by Hou and Perron (2014). This estimator is robust against contaminations and yields nearly unbiased point estimates of d, irrespective of whether contaminations are present or not. The suggested testing procedure has similar size properties as the original test and is often more powerful.

Suggested Citation

  • Kruse, Robinson, 2015. "A modified test against spurious long memory," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 34-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:135:y:2015:i:c:p:34-38
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2015.07.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517651500292X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.07.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhongjun Qu & Pierre Perron, 2013. "A stochastic volatility model with random level shifts and its applications to S&P 500 and NASDAQ return indices," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 16(3), pages 309-339, October.
    2. Ohanissian, Arek & Russell, Jeffrey R. & Tsay, Ruey S., 2008. "True or Spurious Long Memory? A New Test," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 161-175, April.
    3. Arturo Leccadito & Omar Rachedi & Giovanni Urga, 2015. "True Versus Spurious Long Memory: Some Theoretical Results and a Monte Carlo Comparison," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 452-479, April.
    4. Grassi, Stefano & Santucci de Magistris, Paolo, 2014. "When long memory meets the Kalman filter: A comparative study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 301-319.
    5. Hassler, Uwe & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M. & Rubia, Antonio, 2014. "Persistence in the banking industry: Fractional integration and breaks in memory," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 95-112.
    6. Diebold, Francis X. & Inoue, Atsushi, 2001. "Long memory and regime switching," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 131-159, November.
    7. Rasmus T. Varneskov & Pierre Perron, 2018. "Combining long memory and level shifts in modelling and forecasting the volatility of asset returns," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 371-393, March.
    8. Zhongjun Qu, 2011. "A Test Against Spurious Long Memory," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 423-438, July.
    9. Perron, Pierre & Qu, Zhongjun, 2010. "Long-Memory and Level Shifts in the Volatility of Stock Market Return Indices," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 28(2), pages 275-290.
    10. Mccloskey, Adam & Perron, Pierre, 2013. "Memory Parameter Estimation In The Presence Of Level Shifts And Deterministic Trends," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(6), pages 1196-1237, December.
    11. Hou, Jie & Perron, Pierre, 2014. "Modified local Whittle estimator for long memory processes in the presence of low frequency (and other) contaminations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 309-328.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Boca Saravia & Gabriel Rodríguez, 2022. "Presidential approval in Peru: an empirical analysis using a fractionally cointegrated VAR," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 1973-2010, August.
    2. Kruse, Robinson & Leschinski, Christian & Will, Michael, 2016. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy under Long Memory - With an Application to Volatility Forecasting," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-571, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    3. Sibbertsen, Philipp & Leschinski, Christian & Busch, Marie, 2018. "A multivariate test against spurious long memory," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 33-49.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sibbertsen, Philipp & Leschinski, Christian & Busch, Marie, 2018. "A multivariate test against spurious long memory," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 33-49.
    2. Davide Delle Monache & Stefano Grassi & Paolo Santucci de Magistris, 2017. "Does the ARFIMA really shift?," CREATES Research Papers 2017-16, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    3. Ata Assaf & Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana & Khaled Mokni, 2022. "True or spurious long memory in the cryptocurrency markets: evidence from a multivariate test and other Whittle estimation methods," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1543-1570, September.
    4. Kai Wenger & Christian Leschinski & Philipp Sibbertsen, 2019. "Change-in-mean tests in long-memory time series: a review of recent developments," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(2), pages 237-256, June.
    5. Marie Busch & Philipp Sibbertsen, 2018. "An Overview of Modified Semiparametric Memory Estimation Methods," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Kunal Saha & Vinodh Madhavan & Chandrashekhar G. R. & David McMillan, 2020. "Pitfalls in long memory research," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1733280-173, January.
    7. Niels Haldrup & Robinson Kruse, 2014. "Discriminating between fractional integration and spurious long memory," CREATES Research Papers 2014-19, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    8. Wenger, Kai & Leschinski, Christian & Sibbertsen, Philipp, 2017. "The Memory of Volatility," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-601, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    9. Rasmus T. Varneskov & Pierre Perron, 2018. "Combining long memory and level shifts in modelling and forecasting the volatility of asset returns," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 371-393, March.
    10. Rodríguez, Gabriel, 2017. "Modeling Latin-American stock and Forex markets volatility: Empirical application of a model with random level shifts and genuine long memory," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 393-420.
    11. Davide Delle Monache & Stefano Grassi & Paolo Santucci de Magistris, 2015. "Testing for Level Shifts in Fractionally Integrated Processes: a State Space Approach," CREATES Research Papers 2015-30, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    12. Christensen, Bent Jesper & Varneskov, Rasmus Tangsgaard, 2017. "Medium band least squares estimation of fractional cointegration in the presence of low-frequency contamination," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 218-244.
    13. Javier Haulde & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen, 2022. "Fractional integration and cointegration," CREATES Research Papers 2022-02, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    14. Hou, Jie & Perron, Pierre, 2014. "Modified local Whittle estimator for long memory processes in the presence of low frequency (and other) contaminations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 309-328.
    15. Renzo Pardo Figueroa & Gabriel Rodríguez, 2014. "Distinguishing between True and Spurious Long Memory in the Volatility of Stock Market Returns in Latin America," Documentos de Trabajo / Working Papers 2014-395, Departamento de Economía - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    16. Leschinski, Christian & Sibbertsen, Philipp, 2018. "The Periodogram of Spurious Long-Memory Processes," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-632, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    17. Alexander Boca Saravia & Gabriel Rodríguez, 2022. "Presidential approval in Peru: an empirical analysis using a fractionally cointegrated VAR," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 1973-2010, August.
    18. Pierre Perron & Wendong Shi, 2020. "Temporal Aggregation and Long Memory for Asset Price Volatility," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Ye Li & Pierre Perron & Jiawen Xu, 2017. "Modelling exchange rate volatility with random level shifts," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(26), pages 2579-2589, June.
    20. Andersen, Torben G. & Varneskov, Rasmus T., 2021. "Consistent inference for predictive regressions in persistent economic systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 215-244.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Long memory; Structural breaks; Fractional differencing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:135:y:2015:i:c:p:34-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.