IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v196y2022ics0921800922000581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making kin and making sense of human-animal relations in tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Hoarau-Heemstra, Hindertje
  • Kline, Carol

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore how tourism operators make sense of the abilities and needs of working animals during the co-creation of a tourism experience in order to make kin across species. We refer to sense-making as the process in which tourism actors interpret the context, plans, actions and outcomes relating to animal-based tourism. We examine this phenomenon through the eco-feministic lens of making kin and staying with the trouble (Haraway, 2016) by exploring reflections upon the practices in which tourists, animals, and guides are entangled. Qualitative data from Iceland, Norway and the USA reveal that multiple aspects of the relationships during co-creation are “made sense of” including values, knowledge, relationships, abilities and needs. Tensions arise around the differences in values and knowledge between actors bounded in co-creational practices. The study adds to the conversation on “staying with the trouble” of ethics and agency in animal based tourism and contributes to our understanding of the role of empathetic sense-making in animal based tourism, illuminating key issues that contribute to co-creating value for animals, tourists, and providers. We aim to contribute to the field of feminist ecological economics that combines social justice, and ecological perspective, while emphasizing that the services of other-than-humans are essential for wellbeing of all species.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoarau-Heemstra, Hindertje & Kline, Carol, 2022. "Making kin and making sense of human-animal relations in tourism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:196:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922000581
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800922000581
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veuthey, Sandra & Gerber, Julien-François, 2010. "Logging conflicts in Southern Cameroon: A feminist ecological economics perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 170-177, December.
    2. Patterson, Trista M. & Niccolucci, Valentina & Bastianoni, Simone, 2007. "Beyond "more is better": Ecological footprint accounting for tourism and consumption in Val di Merse, Italy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3-4), pages 747-756, May.
    3. Winter, Caroline, 2020. "A review of animal ethics in tourism: Launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on animal ethics in tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Dengler, Corinna & Seebacher, Lisa Marie, 2019. "What About the Global South? Towards a Feminist Decolonial Degrowth Approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 246-252.
    5. Johansson-Stenman, Olof, 2018. "Animal Welfare and Social Decisions: Is It Time to Take Bentham Seriously?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 90-103.
    6. Campos, Ana Cláudia & Mendes, Julio & Valle, Patrícia Oom do & Scott, Noel, 2017. "Co-creating animal-based tourist experiences: Attention, involvement and memorability," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 100-114.
    7. Nancy Gard McGehee, 2012. "Interview Techniques," Chapters, in: Larry Dwyer & Alison Gill & Neelu Seetaram (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Tourism, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Spencer, Phoebe & Perkins, Patricia E. & Erickson, Jon D., 2018. "Re-establishing Justice as a Pillar of Ecological Economics Through Feminist Perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 191-198.
    9. Sheldon, Pauline J., 2020. "Designing tourism experiences for inner transformation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perkins, Patricia E. (Ellie), 2019. "Climate justice, commons, and degrowth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 183-190.
    2. Hanaček, Ksenija & Roy, Brototi & Avila, Sofia & Kallis, Giorgos, 2020. "Ecological economics and degrowth: Proposing a future research agenda from the margins," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Jiyoung Hwang & Hyo-Yeun Park, 2021. "Hermeneutic Phenomenological Understanding of the Inner Journey of Templestay," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Maria Serena Mancini & Mikel Evans & Katsunori Iha & Carla Danelutti & Alessandro Galli, 2018. "Assessing the Ecological Footprint of Ecotourism Packages: A Methodological Proposition," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-37, June.
    5. Fuchs, Matthias, 2023. "A post-Cartesian economic and Buddhist view on tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. Läpple, Doris & Osawe, Osayanmon Wellington, 2022. "Animal Welfare, Altruism and Policy Support," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321212, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    7. Mark Budolfson & Romain Espinosa & Bob Fischer & Nicolas Treich, 2024. "Monetizing Animal Welfare Impacts for Benefit–Cost Analysis," Post-Print hal-04645320, HAL.
    8. Mahmoud Alreahi & Zoltán Bujdosó & Lóránt Dénes Dávid & Balázs Gyenge, 2023. "Green Supply Chain Management in Hotel Industry: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-32, March.
    9. Hestermann, Nina & Le Yaouanq, Yves & Treich, Nicolas, 2020. "An economic model of the meat paradox," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Sinha, Avik & Rastogi, Siddhartha K., 2017. "Collaboration between Central and State Government and Environmental Quality: Evidences from Indian Cities," MPRA Paper 100012, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Buch-Hansen, Hubert & Nesterova, Iana, 2021. "Towards a science of deep transformations: Initiating a dialogue between degrowth and critical realism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    12. HsiuJu Rebecca Yen & Hoa Pham Thi & Eldon Y. Li, 2021. "Understanding customer-centric socialization in tourism services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(4), pages 695-723, December.
    13. Perino, Grischa & Schwirplies, Claudia, 2022. "Meaty arguments and fishy effects: Field experimental evidence on the impact of reasons to reduce meat consumption," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    14. Becken, S. & Simmons, D., 2008. "Using the concept of yield to assess the sustainability of different tourist types," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 420-429, October.
    15. Anna Scuttari & Lucia Maria Della & Umberto Martini, 2014. "La mobilit? sostenibile tra destination management e mobility management. Un?analisi esplorativa in alto adige," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 125-151.
    16. Handayani, Bintang, 2021. "Foodstragramming of Solo Dining Experiencescape: The Fear of Missing Out," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 12(01), January.
    17. White, Thomas J., 2007. "Sharing resources: The global distribution of the Ecological Footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 402-410, December.
    18. Jaume Rosselló Nadal & Mohcine Bakhat, 2009. "A new approach to estimating tourism-induced electricity consumption," CRE Working Papers (Documents de treball del CRE) 2009/6, Centre de Recerca Econòmica (UIB ·"Sa Nostra").
    19. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:2:p:315-330 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Gräbner-Radkowitsch, Claudius & Strunk, Birte, 2023. "Degrowth and the Global South: The twin problem of global dependencies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    21. Yanfang Zeng & Rui Xu, 2021. "An Exploration of the Relationships between Nostalgia, Involvement, and Behavioral Intention in Diaspora Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:196:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922000581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.