IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v149y2018icp40-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Outcome of Classical Biological Control: A Case Study on the Eucalyptus Snout Beetle, Gonipterus platensis, and the Parasitoid Anaphes nitens

Author

Listed:
  • Valente, Carlos
  • Gonçalves, Catarina I.
  • Monteiro, Fernanda
  • Gaspar, João
  • Silva, Margarida
  • Sottomayor, Miguel
  • Paiva, Maria Rosa
  • Branco, Manuela

Abstract

Despite the importance of invasive pests, few studies address the costs and benefits of the strategies used to control them. The present work assesses the economic impact of the Eucalyptus snout beetle, Gonipterus platensis, and the benefits resulting from its biological control with Anaphes nitens in Portugal, over a 20-year period. Comparisons were made between the real situation (with A. nitens) and three scenarios without biological control: 1) replacement of Eucalyptus globulus by resistant eucalypts; 2) insecticide use; and 3) offset of yield losses by imported wood. A cost-benefit analysis was performed to evaluate a programme that aimed to accelerate A. nitens establishment. Although A. nitens provides adequate pest control in several regions, 46% of the area planted with eucalypts is affected by the beetle, causing wood losses of 648 M euros over 20 years. Losses in the three hypothetical scenarios were estimated at 2451 M-7164 M euros, resulting in benefits from biological control of 1803 M–6516 M euros, despite the fact that only partial success was achieved. Anticipating biological control by just one, two, or three years resulted in benefit-cost ratios of 67, 190, and 347, respectively. Because nonmarket values were not accounted for, these figures are likely underestimated.

Suggested Citation

  • Valente, Carlos & Gonçalves, Catarina I. & Monteiro, Fernanda & Gaspar, João & Silva, Margarida & Sottomayor, Miguel & Paiva, Maria Rosa & Branco, Manuela, 2018. "Economic Outcome of Classical Biological Control: A Case Study on the Eucalyptus Snout Beetle, Gonipterus platensis, and the Parasitoid Anaphes nitens," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 40-47.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:40-47
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800917312983
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corey J. A. Bradshaw & Boris Leroy & Céline Bellard & David Roiz & Céline Albert & Alice Fournier & Morgane Barbet-Massin & Jean-Michel Salles & Frédéric Simard & Franck Courchamp, 2016. "Massive yet grossly underestimated global costs of invasive insects," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Sexton, Steven E. & Lei, Zhen & Zilberman, David, 2007. "The Economics of Pesticides and Pest Control," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 1(3), pages 271-326, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacquet, Florence & Butault, Jean-Pierre & Guichard, Laurence, 2011. "An economic analysis of the possibility of reducing pesticides in French field crops," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1638-1648, July.
    2. Marie Lassalas & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2024. "The technical and economic effects of biodiversity standards on wheat production," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 51(2), pages 275-308.
    3. Perry, Edward D. & Moschini, GianCarlo, 2020. "Neonicotinoids in U.S. maize: Insecticide substitution effects and environmental risk," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Md. Sohanur Rahman & Md. Nazrul Islam & Mohammad Sahin Polan & Fakhar Uddin Talukder & Md. Mia Mukul, 2021. "Relative Toxicity Of Some Chemical Pesticides Against Jute Hairy Caterpillar (Spilosoma Obliqua W.) In Tossa Jute (Corchorus Olitorius L.)," Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture (MJSA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 115-122, April.
    5. Budy P. Resosudarmo, 2001. "Impact of the Integrated Pest Management Program on the Indonesian Economy," Economics and Environment Network Working Papers 0102, Australian National University, Economics and Environment Network.
    6. David A Roiz & Paulina A. Pontifes & Frédéric Jourdain & Christophe Diagne & Boris Leroy & Anne-Charlotte Vaissière & María José Tolsá-García & Jean-Michel Salles & Frédéric Simard & Franck Courchamp, 2024. "The rising global economic costs of invasive Aedes mosquitoes and Aedes-borne diseases," Post-Print hal-04573122, HAL.
    7. Danish A. Ahmed & Phillip J. Haubrock & Ross N. Cuthbert & Alok Bang & Ismael Soto & Paride Balzani & Ali Serhan Tarkan & Rafael L. Macêdo & Laís Carneiro & Thomas W. Bodey & Francisco J. Oficialdegui, 2023. "Recent advances in availability and synthesis of the economic costs of biological invasions," Post-Print hal-04148456, HAL.
    8. Antonín Kouba & Francisco J Oficialdegui & Ross N Cuthbert & Melina Kourantidou & Josie South & Elena Tricarico & Rodolphe E Gozlan & Franck Courchamp & Phillip J Haubrock, 2022. "Identifying economic costs and knowledge gaps of invasive aquatic crustaceans," Post-Print hal-03860579, HAL.
    9. Alexander H DeGolia & Elizabeth H T Hiroyasu & Sarah E Anderson, 2019. "Economic losses or environmental gains? Framing effects on public support for environmental management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Chiadmi, Ines & Traoré, Sidnoma Abdoul Aziz & Salles, Jean-Michel, 2020. "Asian tiger mosquito far from home: Assessing the impact of invasive mosquitoes on the French Mediterranean littoral," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    11. Thomas W Bodey & Zachary T Carter & Phillip J Haubrock & Ross N Cuthbert & Melissa J Welsh & Christophe Diagne & Franck Courchamp, 2022. "Building a synthesis of economic costs of biological invasions in New Zealand," Post-Print hal-03860523, HAL.
    12. Francesca Della Rocca & Pietro Milanesi, 2022. "The New Dominator of the World: Modeling the Global Distribution of the Japanese Beetle under Land Use and Climate Change Scenarios," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Zhiyuan Xiang & Meifang Zhao & U. S. Ogbodo, 2020. "Accumulation of Urban Insect Pests in China: 50 Years’ Observations on Camphor Tree ( Cinnamomum camphora )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Finger, Robert & Möhring, Niklas, 2022. "The adoption of pesticide-free wheat production and farmers' perceptions of its environmental and health effects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    15. Jonathan McFadden & David Smith & Steven Wallander, 2022. "Climate, Drought Exposure, and Technology Adoption: An Application to Drought-Tolerant Corn in the United States," NBER Chapters, in: American Agriculture, Water Resources, and Climate Change, pages 203-239, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Wallace E. Huffman & Yu Jin & Zheng Xu, 2018. "The economic impacts of technology and climate change: New evidence from U.S. corn yields," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(4), pages 463-479, July.
    17. Phillip Cassey & Steven Delean & Julie L Lockwood & Jason S Sadowski & Tim M Blackburn, 2018. "Dissecting the null model for biological invasions: A meta-analysis of the propagule pressure effect," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Carpentier, Alain, 2017. "Risk Aversion And Pesticide Use: Further Insights From Prospect Theory," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261265, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Amer Ait Sidhoum & Carolin Canessa & Johannes Sauer, 2023. "Effects of agri‐environment schemes on farm‐level eco‐efficiency measures: Empirical evidence from EU countries," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 551-569, June.
    20. Qi Cai & Yushi Cai & Yali Wen, 2018. "Spatially Differentiated Trends between Forest Pest-Induced Losses and Measures for Their Control in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:40-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.