IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v82y2024icp1337-1352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Curvilinear effect of policy intensity on innovation performance in the integrated circuit industry: Too much of a good thing?

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Tianchi
  • Sun, Ting
  • Chen, Qiuling

Abstract

The improvement of innovation performance is critical to the high-quality development of the integrated circuit industry. Regional innovation cannot be delivered and sustained without the help of governments. This paper uses negative binomial regression to investigate the quadratic relationship between policy intensity and innovation performance in the integrated circuit industry at the city level and reveals how network centrality moderates this relationship. The results are given as follows. First, policy intensity exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with innovation performance. Second, after network centrality is introduced, the relationship between policy intensity and innovation performance shows a shape-flip from inverted U-shaped in low network centrality to U-shaped in high network centrality. Third, compared with exploitative innovation performance, exploratory innovation performance is more sensitive to policy intensity and needs higher network centrality to change the link from an inverted U-shaped to a U-shaped relationship. This research reveals the importance of incorporating cooperation into the interactive framework between policy and innovation, which provides guidance for fostering innovation in the global integrated circuit industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Tianchi & Sun, Ting & Chen, Qiuling, 2024. "Curvilinear effect of policy intensity on innovation performance in the integrated circuit industry: Too much of a good thing?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1337-1352.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:82:y:2024:i:c:p:1337-1352
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2024.05.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S031359262400122X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2024.05.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimos, Christos & Pugh, Geoff & Hisarciklilar, Mehtap & Talam, Ema & Jackson, Ian, 2022. "The relative effectiveness of R&D tax credits and R&D subsidies: A comparative meta-regression analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. Du, Yanan & Guo, Qunna, 2023. "Green credit policy and green innovation in green industries: Does climate policy uncertainty matter?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    3. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    4. Wang, Mei Ling, 2023. "Effects of the green finance policy on the green innovation efficiency of the manufacturing industry: A difference-in-difference model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2022. "Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Harun Alp & Nicholas Bloom & William Kerr, 2018. "Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(11), pages 3450-3491, November.
    7. Nick Johnstone & Ivan Haščič & Julie Poirier & Marion Hemar & Christian Michel, 2012. "Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: evidence from survey data and patent counts," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(17), pages 2157-2170, June.
    8. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Chen, Hao & Chai, Jian & Wang, Shouyang & Lev, Benjamin, 2020. "Performance evaluation and prediction of the integrated circuit industry in China: A hybrid method," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Li Yao & Jun Li, 2022. "Intercity innovation collaboration and the role of high-speed rail connections: evidence from Chinese co-patent data," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(11), pages 1845-1857, November.
    10. Chen, Zhongfei & Zhang, Xiao & Chen, Fanglin, 2021. "Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Xiaolan Fu & Rongping Mu, 2014. "Enhancing China's Innovation Performance: The Policy Choices," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 22(2), pages 42-60, March.
    12. Yanyang Yan & Juan Wang & Sijia Qiao, 2022. "Effects of Industrial Policy on Firms’ Innovation Outputs: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    13. Hongchen Li & Huijun Qi & Hongjian Cao & Li Yuan, 2022. "Industrial Policy and Technological Innovation of New Energy Vehicle Industry in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Yun Liu & Zhe Yan & Yijie Cheng & Xuanting Ye, 2018. "Exploring the Technological Collaboration Characteristics of the Global Integrated Circuit Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    15. Gilsing, Victor & Nooteboom, Bart & Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Duysters, Geert & van den Oord, Ad, 2008. "Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1717-1731, December.
    16. Sun, Huaping & Edziah, Bless Kofi & Sun, Chuanwang & Kporsu, Anthony Kwaku, 2022. "Institutional quality and its spatial spillover effects on energy efficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    17. Abhijit V. Banerjee & Benjamin Moll, 2010. "Why Does Misallocation Persist?," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 189-206, January.
    18. Yao, Li & Li, Jun & Li, Jian, 2020. "Urban innovation and intercity patent collaboration: A network analysis of China’s national innovation system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Huang, Zhehao & Liao, Gaoke & Li, Zhenghui, 2019. "Loaning scale and government subsidy for promoting green innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 148-156.
    20. Boqiang Lin and Yufang Chen, 2023. "Impact of the Feed-in Tariff Policy on Renewable Innovation: Evidence from Wind Power Industry and Photovoltaic Power Industry in China," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    21. Yan, Chen & Ji, Yaxing & Chen, Rui, 2023. "Research on the mechanism of selective industrial policies on enterprises' innovation performance ——Evidence from China's photovoltaic industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    22. Richard F. J. Haans & Constant Pieters & Zi-Lin He, 2016. "Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1177-1195, July.
    23. Roderik Ponds & Frank Van Oort & Koen Frenken, 2007. "The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(3), pages 423-443, August.
    24. Wai Fong Boh & Cheng‐Jen Huang & Anne Wu, 2020. "Investor experience and innovation performance: The mediating role of external cooperation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 124-151, January.
    25. Pavitt, K, 1976. "Government policies towards innovation: A review of empirical findings," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 4(5), pages 539-558.
    26. Wan, Qunchao & Chen, Jin & Yao, Zhu & Yuan, Ling, 2022. "Preferential tax policy and R&D personnel flow for technological innovation efficiency of China's high-tech industry in an emerging economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    27. Wen, Jun & Wang, Siqin & Yang, Xiuyun & Zhou, Xiaozhou, 2023. "Impacts of epidemics on innovation: An empirical analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    28. Jiang, Zihao & Shi, Jiarong, 2023. "Government intervention and technological innovation in the wind power industry in China: The role of industrial environmental turbulence," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    29. Xin Wang & Zheng Yao & Chaoqun Ma & Chengang Wang, 2024. "Does digital economy policy benefit green innovation? Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 377-407, March.
    30. Dong, John Qi & Yang, Chia-Han, 2016. "Being central is a double-edged sword: Knowledge network centrality and new product development in U.S. pharmaceutical industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 379-385.
    31. Gershman, Mikhail & Gokhberg, Leonid & Kuznetsova, Tatiana & Roud, Vitaly, 2018. "Bridging S&T and innovation in Russia: A historical perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 132-140.
    32. Boqiang Lin & Yufang Chen, 2023. "Impact of the Feed-in Tariff Policy on Renewable Innovation: Evidence from Wind Power Industry and Photovoltaic Power Industry in China," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(2), pages 29-46, March.
    33. Yi, Li & Xiao, Li & Liao, Yinkai, 2024. "Network centrality, style drift, and mutual fund performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    34. Zeng, Juying & Pagàn-Castaño, Esther & Ribeiro-Navarrete, Samuel, 2022. "Merits of Intercity Innovation Cooperation of Environment-friendly Patents for Environmental Regulation Efficiency," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    35. Jiang, Zihao & Liu, Zhiying, 2022. "Policies and exploitative and exploratory innovations of the wind power industry in China: The role of technological path dependence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angelo Kenneth S. Romasanta & Peter Sijde & Jacqueline Muijlwijk-Koezen, 2020. "Innovation in pharmaceutical R&D: mapping the research landscape," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 1801-1832, December.
    2. Runbo Zhao & Huiying Zhang & Marina Yue Zhang & Fei Qu & Yunlong Xu, 2023. "Competitor-Weighted Centrality and Small-World Clusters in Competition Networks on Firms’ Innovation Ambidexterity: Evidence from the Wind Energy Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Jacob, Jojo & Duysters, Geert, 2017. "Alliance network configurations and the co-evolution of firms' technology profiles: An analysis of the biopharmaceutical industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 90-102.
    4. Zhong, Meirui & Lu, Qiaolin & He, Ruifang, 2022. "The heterogeneous effects of industrial policy on technological innovation: Evidence from China's new metal material industry and micro-data," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Huang, Xiulu & Wang, Xiaoyu & Ge, Pengfei, 2024. "Selective industrial policy and innovation resource misallocation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 124-146.
    6. Ruling Zhang & Killian J. McCarthy & Xiao Wang, 2022. "Two's company, three's a crowd: The impact of corporate venture capital unit's investment partners on the corporate investor's innovation performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(4), pages 975-987, June.
    7. Xiaoli Li & Kun Li & Hao Zhou, 2022. "Impact of Inventor’s Cooperation Network on Ambidextrous Innovation in Chinese AI Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    9. Guiyang Zhang, 2021. "Employee co-invention network dynamics and firm exploratory innovation: the moderation of employee co-invention network centralization and knowledge-employee network equilibrium," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7811-7836, September.
    10. Lorenzo Cassi & Anne Plunket, 2014. "Proximity, network formation and inventive performance: in search of the proximity paradox," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), pages 395-422, September.
    11. Amalesh Sharma & V. Kumar & Jun Yan & Sourav Bikash Borah & Anirban Adhikary, 2019. "Understanding the structural characteristics of a firm’s whole buyer–supplier network and its impact on international business performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(3), pages 365-392, April.
    12. Teis Hansen, 2014. "Juggling with Proximity and Distance: Collaborative Innovation Projects in the Danish Cleantech Industry," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 90(4), pages 375-402, October.
    13. Flemming Sørensen & Jan Mattsson, 2016. "Speeding Up Innovation: Building Network Structures For Parallel Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-30, February.
    14. Guiyang Zhang & Chaoying Tang & Yong Qi, 2020. "Alliance Network Diversity and Innovation Ambidexterity: The Differential Roles of Industrial Diversity, Geographical Diversity, and Functional Diversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Gupeng Zhang & Xiao Wang & Hongbo Duan, 2020. "Obscure but important: examining the indirect effects of alliance networks in exploratory and exploitative innovation paradigms," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 1745-1764, September.
    16. Bart Leten & Rene Belderbos & Bart Van Looy, 2016. "Entry and Technological Performance in New Technology Domains: Technological Opportunities, Technology Competition and Technological Relatedness," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(8), pages 1257-1291, December.
    17. Anu Wadhwa & Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas & M. B. Sarkar, 2017. "The Paradox of Openness and Value Protection Strategies: Effect of Extramural R&D on Innovative Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 873-896, October.
    18. Huang, Hongyun & Mbanyele, William & Wang, Fengrong & Song, Malin & Wang, Yuzhang, 2022. "Climbing the quality ladder of green innovation: Does green finance matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Jorge Rivera & Viviane Clement, 2019. "Business adaptation to climate change: American ski resorts and warmer temperatures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1285-1301, November.
    20. Christian Omobhude & Shih-Hsin Chen, 2019. "The Roles and Measurements of Proximity in Sustained Technology Development: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:82:y:2024:i:c:p:1337-1352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.