IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v111y2020ics0190740919310412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Protective Factors Survey, 2nd Edition: Establishing validity and reliability of a self-report measure of protective factors against child maltreatment

Author

Listed:
  • Sprague-Jones, Jessica
  • Singh, Pallavi
  • Rousseau, Mallory
  • Counts, Jacqueline
  • Firman, Casandra

Abstract

The Protective Factors Survey, 2nd Edition (PFS-2) is designed to support the evaluation of child maltreatment prevention programs. It measures four protective factors thought to be critical in the prevention of abuse and neglect: Family Functioning/Resilience, Nurturing and Attachment, Social Supports, and Concrete Supports. It also measures a fifth component, the Caregiver/Practitioner Relationship, to assess the respondent’s engagement with the program or service being evaluated. In this study, we describe a national field test collecting PFS-2 data across 60 individual program sites in seven states (N = 826). The results from this study indicate that the PFS-2 is a valid, reliable, and stable measure. Implications for the child maltreatment prevention field are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sprague-Jones, Jessica & Singh, Pallavi & Rousseau, Mallory & Counts, Jacqueline & Firman, Casandra, 2020. "The Protective Factors Survey, 2nd Edition: Establishing validity and reliability of a self-report measure of protective factors against child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:111:y:2020:i:c:s0190740919310412
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740919310412
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merritt, Darcey H., 2009. "Child abuse potential: Correlates with child maltreatment rates and structural measures of neighborhoods," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 927-934, August.
    2. Kang, Jiyoung, 2012. "Pathways from social support to service use among caregivers at risk of child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 933-939.
    3. Raissian, Kerri M. & Bullinger, Lindsey Rose, 2017. "Money matters: Does the minimum wage affect child maltreatment rates?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 60-70.
    4. Ono, Mayo & Honda, Sumihisa, 2017. "Association between social support and child abuse potential among Japanese mothers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 88-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bennett, Davara L. & Webb, Calum J.R. & Mason, Kate E. & Schlüter, Daniela K. & Fahy, Katie & Alexiou, Alexandros & Wickham, Sophie & Barr, Ben & Taylor-Robinson, David, 2021. "Funding for preventative Children’s Services and rates of children becoming looked after: A natural experiment using longitudinal area-level data in England," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. M. Carmen Cano-Lozano & María J. Navas-Martínez & Lourdes Contreras, 2021. "Child-to-Parent Violence during Confinement Due to COVID-19: Relationship with Other Forms of Family Violence and Psychosocial Stressors in Spanish Youth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Smith, Brenda D. & Kay, Emma Sophia & Womack, Bethany G., 2017. "How can county-level maltreatment report rates better inform child welfare practice?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 341-347.
    4. Maguire-Jack, Kathryn & Font, Sarah A., 2017. "Intersections of individual and neighborhood disadvantage: Implications for child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 44-51.
    5. Shaari, Mohd Shahidan & Harun, Nor Hidayah & Hussain, Nor Ermawati, 2019. "Female Labour Force and Child Abuse in Malaysia Using ARDL Approach," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 53(1), pages 27-33.
    6. Averett, Susan L. & Smith, Julie K. & Wang, Yang, 2019. "Minimum Wages and the Health and Access to Care of Immigrants' Children," IZA Discussion Papers 12606, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Feely, Megan & Seay, Kristen D. & Loomis, Alysse M., 2019. "Harsh physical punishment as a mediator between income, re-reports and out-of-home placement in a child protective services-involved population," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 70-78.
    8. Louis‐Philippe Beland & Jason Huh & Dongwoo Kim, 2021. "The effect of Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansions on foster care admissions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(11), pages 2943-2951, November.
    9. Malte Sandner & Stephan L. Thomsen & Libertad González Luna, 2020. "Preventing child maltreatment: Beneficial side effects of public childcare provision," Economics Working Papers 1744, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    10. Poon, Kean, 2020. "The impact of socioeconomic status on parental factors in promoting academic achievement in Chinese children," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Son, Heimi & Lee, Young Ae & Ahn, Dong Hyun & Doan, Stacey N., 2017. "Maternal understanding of child discipline and maltreatment in the United States, South Korea, and Japan," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 444-454.
    12. Metzler, Marilyn & Merrick, Melissa T. & Klevens, Joanne & Ports, Katie A. & Ford, Derek C., 2017. "Adverse childhood experiences and life opportunities: Shifting the narrative," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 141-149.
    13. Lindsey Rose Bullinger & Vivian Wang & Kenneth A. Feder, 2022. "Effects of Opioid Treatment Programs on Child Well-Being," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 703(1), pages 79-105, September.
    14. Schenck-Fontaine, Anika & Gassman-Pines, Anna, 2020. "Income inequality and child maltreatment risk during economic recession," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Elisabetta De Cao, 2017. "The Impact of Unemployment on Child Maltreatment in the United States," Economics Series Working Papers 837, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    16. Latzman, Natasha E. & Lokey, Colby & Lesesne, Catherine A. & Klevens, Joanne & Cheung, Karen & Condron, Susanne & Garraza, Lucas Godoy, 2019. "An evaluation of welfare and child welfare system integration on rates of child maltreatment in Colorado," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 386-395.
    17. Honda, Hikaru & Kita, Toshiko & Hirano, Michiyo & Saeki, Kazuko, 2020. "A strategy to rescue mothers from isolated parenting: Development of the “social connectivity of mother with people in the community scale”," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    18. Dan Brown & Elisabetta De Cao, 2017. "The Impact of Unemployment on Child Maltreatment in the United States," Economics Papers 2017-W04, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    19. Block, Kristina & Kaplan, Jacob, 2022. "Testing the Cinderella effect: Measuring victim injury in child abuse cases," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    20. Cai, Julie Yixia, 2021. "Earnings instability and child protection: Evidence from state administrative data," SocArXiv y825p, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:111:y:2020:i:c:s0190740919310412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.