IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v156y2024ics0190740923005273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professionals’ understanding of the County Lines phenomenon: Insights from a study exploring the perceptions of young peoples’ supported accommodation staff

Author

Listed:
  • Pearson, Jessica
  • Cavener, John

Abstract

This paper presents findings of a study exploring professionals’ understanding of the County Lines phenomenon. Employed across two voluntary sector young peoples’ supported accommodation projects a purposeful sample of fifteen (n = 15) practitioners were recruited as study participants. The study purpose was to explore professional perceptions of criminal exploitation in the context of County Lines and identify how practitioners recognised and responded to children and young people at risk. Questions guiding the study included: (1) What are practitioners’ perceptions of criminal exploitation and County Lines? (2) How do practitioners recognise and respond to children and young people at risk? With a review of literature, data collection methods comprised a: (1) case study vignette and (2) self-reporting questionnaire. Utilising aspects of content analysis combining highest frequencies of most common terms and references presented in data, comparable participant responses were coded into four (n = 4) key categories. Categories included: (1) Knowledge of criminal exploitation and County Lines (2) Recognising risk and vulnerability factors (3) Understanding methods of exploitation and responding to risk and (4) Practitioner attitudes, bias and stereotypes. Findings highlight disparities in professionals’ understanding in relation to: (1) what County Lines is (2) how and why some children and young people are criminally exploited in the context of County Lines and (3) how practitioners identify and respond to children and young people at risk. Need for development of enhanced knowledge-depth for safeguarding practice is identified as required around practitioners’ understanding of: (1) risk, vulnerability factors and the signs of criminal exploitation through County Lines (2) importance of ensuring multi-agency statutory safeguarding referrals and responses are undertaken (3) how legal frameworks including the National Referral Mechanism and Modern Slavery Act (2015) can offer victims protection and (4) importance of theoretically informed relationship-based practice with children and young people guided by trauma-informed principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Pearson, Jessica & Cavener, John, 2024. "Professionals’ understanding of the County Lines phenomenon: Insights from a study exploring the perceptions of young peoples’ supported accommodation staff," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:156:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005273
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923005273
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liquan Shen & Ping An & Zhi Liu, 2017. "Context-adaptive based CU processing for 3D-HEVC," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, February.
    2. McKibbin, Gemma, 2017. "Preventing Harmful Sexual Behaviour and Child Sexual Exploitation for children & young people living in residential care: A scoping review in the Australian context," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 373-382.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meghan Finch & Rebecca Featherston & Sangita Chakraborty & Ludvig Bjørndal & Robyn Mildon & Bianca Albers & Caroline Fiennes & David J. A. Taylor & Rebecca Schachtman & Taoran Yang & Aron Shlonsky, 2021. "Interventions that address institutional child maltreatment: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), March.
    2. Tetti Solehati & Auliya Ramanda Fikri & Cecep Eli Kosasih & Yanti Hermayanti & Henny Suzana Mediani, 2022. "The Current Preventing of Child Sexual Abuse: A Scoping Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Gatwiri, Kathomi & Cameron, Nadine & Mcpherson, Lynne & Parmenter, Natalie, 2020. "What is known about child sexual exploitation in residential care in Australia? A systematic scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Hallett, Sophie, 2023. "Responding to child sexual exploitation in Australia: Challenges and opportunities from the perspectives of case workers in a statutory care environment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    5. Yüksel, Fadime & Koçtürk, Nilüfer, 2020. "Child sexual abuse in preschool age: Victims, perpetrators and familial risk factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:156:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.