IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v156y2024ics0190740923004486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale short form (PSS-10) in Chinese adolescents: Validity, measurement invariance across gender and left-behind status

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Wei
  • Liang, Yuxin
  • Cheng, Jiayuan
  • Xie, Enhui
  • Zhu, Qiqi
  • Liu, Jie

Abstract

The perceived stress scale is one of the most commonly used instruments to measure individual perception or perceived stress. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the short version of the perceived stress scale (PSS-10) in Chinese adolescents. A total of 977 Chinese middle school students completed a set of scales, which included PSS-10, the general health questionnaire (GHQ-12), the self-esteem scale (SES), and the brief resilience scale (BRS). Results showed that the PSS-10 had a robust two-factor structure through confirmatory factor analysis. Latent mean measurement invariance (MI) across gender and left-behind status also be supported. The PSS-10 had acceptable reliability and significant moderate correlation with the GHQ-12, SES, and BRS. In conclusion, the Chinese version of the PSS-10 is a reliable and valid assessment for measuring stress in Chinese adolescents.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Wei & Liang, Yuxin & Cheng, Jiayuan & Xie, Enhui & Zhu, Qiqi & Liu, Jie, 2024. "Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale short form (PSS-10) in Chinese adolescents: Validity, measurement invariance across gender and left-behind status," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:156:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923004486
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923004486
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Meredith, 1993. "Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 525-543, December.
    2. Zhen Wang & Jue Chen & Jennifer E Boyd & Haiyin Zhang & Xiuzhen Jia & Jianyin Qiu & Zeping Xiao, 2011. "Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Stress Scale in Policewomen," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-4, December.
    3. Eleni Andreou & Evangelos C. Alexopoulos & Christos Lionis & Liza Varvogli & Charalambos Gnardellis & George P. Chrousos & Christina Darviri, 2011. "Perceived Stress Scale: Reliability and Validity Study in Greece," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Julian C. L. Lai & Xiaodong Yue, 2014. "Using the Brief Resilience Scale to Assess Chinese People’s Ability to Bounce Back From Stress," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johan Oud & Manuel Voelkle, 2014. "Do missing values exist? Incomplete data handling in cross-national longitudinal studies by means of continuous time modeling," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3271-3288, November.
    2. Liat Ayalon, 2018. "Perceived Age Discrimination: A Precipitator or a Consequence of Depressive Symptoms?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(5), pages 860-869.
    3. Ihsana Sabriani Borualogo & Ferran Casas, 2023. "Bullying Victimisation and Children’s Subjective Well-being: A Comparative Study in Seven Asian Countries," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Shelley H. Liu & Yitong Chen & Jordan R. Kuiper & Emily Ho & Jessie P. Buckley & Leah Feuerstahler, 2024. "Applying Latent Variable Models to Estimate Cumulative Exposure Burden to Chemical Mixtures and Identify Latent Exposure Subgroups: A Critical Review and Future Directions," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 16(2), pages 482-502, July.
    5. Janina Isabel Steinert & Lucie Dale Cluver & G. J. Melendez-Torres & Sebastian Vollmer, 2018. "One Size Fits All? The Validity of a Composite Poverty Index Across Urban and Rural Households in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 51-72, February.
    6. Paul MUKUCHA & Divaries Cosmas JARAVAZA & Forbes MAKUDZA, 2022. "Towards Gender-Based Market Segmentation: The Differential Influence of Gender on Dining Experiences in the University Cafeteria Industry," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(2), pages 182-200, June.
    7. Fix, Rebecca L. & Mendelson, Tamar, 2022. "Stress, worry, and health problems experienced by Black and Indigenous caregivers of girls with juvenile legal system involvement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Amber Mosewich & Valerie Hadd & Peter Crocker & Bruno Zumbo, 2013. "Invariance Testing of the SF-36 Health Survey in Women Breast Cancer Survivors: Do Personal and Cancer-related Variables Influence the Meaning of Quality of Life Items?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 559-577, January.
    9. Pedro Belinchón-deMiguel & Pablo Ruisoto & Beat Knechtle & Pantelis T. Nikolaidis & Beliña Herrera-Tapias & Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, 2021. "Predictors of Athlete’s Performance in Ultra-Endurance Mountain Races," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-8, January.
    10. Stéfanie André, 2014. "Does Trust Mean the Same for Migrants and Natives? Testing Measurement Models of Political Trust with Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 963-982, February.
    11. Kroh, Julia & Globocnik, Dietfried & Schultz, Carsten & Holdhof, Frederike & Salomo, Søren, 2024. "Micro-foundations of digital innovation capability – A mixed method approach to develop and validate a multi-dimensional measurement instrument," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    12. Francisco J. Conejo & Lawrence F. Cunningham & Clifford E. Young, 2020. "Revisiting the Brand Luxury Index: new empirical evidence and future directions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 108-122, January.
    13. Eldad Davidov & Stefan Thörner & Peter Schmidt & Stefanie Gosen & Carina Wolf, 2011. "Level and change of group-focused enmity in Germany: unconditional and conditional latent growth curve models with four panel waves," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(4), pages 481-500, December.
    14. P. Couper, Mick & Cernat, Alexandru & Beth Ofstedal, Mary, 2015. "Estimation of mode effects in the Health and Retirement Study using measurement models," ISER Working Paper Series 2015-19, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    15. Carlos Miguel Lemos & Ross Joseph Gore & Ivan Puga-Gonzalez & F LeRon Shults, 2019. "Dimensionality and factorial invariance of religiosity among Christians and the religiously unaffiliated: A cross-cultural analysis based on the International Social Survey Programme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-36, May.
    16. Eva Padrosa & Mireia Bolíbar & Mireia Julià & Joan Benach, 2021. "Comparing Precarious Employment Across Countries: Measurement Invariance of the Employment Precariousness Scale for Europe (EPRES-E)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 893-915, April.
    17. Willem E. Saris & André Pirralha & Diana Zavala-Rojas, 2018. "Testing the Comparability of Different Types of Social Indicators Across Groups," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 927-939, February.
    18. Zhenzhen Zhang & Thomas M. Braun & Karen E. Peterson & Howard Hu & Martha M. Téllez-Rojo & Brisa N. Sánchez, 2018. "Extending Tests of Random Effects to Assess for Measurement Invariance in Factor Models," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 10(3), pages 634-650, December.
    19. Manuel Sánchez-García & Joan Batista-Foguet, 2008. "Congruency of the Cognitive and Affective Components of the Attitude as a Moderator on Intention of Condom Use Predictors," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 139-155, May.
    20. Román, Francisco J. & Morillo, Daniel & Estrada, Eduardo & Escorial, Sergio & Karama, Sherif & Colom, Roberto, 2018. "Brain-intelligence relationships across childhood and adolescence: A latent-variable approach," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 21-29.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:156:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923004486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.