IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v150y2023ics0190740923001937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Youth Dually-Involved in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems: Varying definitions and their associations with trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress, & offending

Author

Listed:
  • Modrowski, Crosby A.
  • Chaplo, Shannon D.
  • Kerig, Patricia K.

Abstract

Recently, scholars have placed increasing effort on better understanding the unique needs of youth involved in both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. This study drew from the Developmental Cascade of Multisystem Involvement Framework to examine group differences in trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and offending among youth solely involved in the juvenile justice system and youth with varying degrees of dual-system involvement, including crossover youth (i.e., youth with a history of maltreatment and offending regardless of system involvement), dual-contact youth (i.e., youth who had a history of a substantiated CW maltreatment petition prior to their involvement in the current study), and dually-involved youth (i.e., youth under the care and custody of the state's child welfare system at the time of study participation). Four-hundred adolescents (25% girls, Mage = 15.97) who were recruited from a detention center and completed self-report measures assessing trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress, and offending. Juvenile justice and child welfare records also were collected. Results indicated that, compared to youth solely involved in the juvenile justice system, crossover youth reported significantly more exposure to traumatic events, more severe posttraumatic stress symptoms, and more self-reported offending. In contrast, results indicated few differences between dual-contact youth and youth solely involved in the juvenile justice system; these groups only differed in age and in recidivism charges. There also were few differences between dually-involved youth and youth solely involved in the juvenile justice system; these groups only differed in age and exposure to non-Criterion A traumatic events. The current results suggest that categorizing youth as crossover youth based on their own self-reported history of child maltreatment exposure resulted in more observed differences between dual-system youth and youth solely involved in juvenile justice. The present results have valuable implications for how we operationalize youth’s system involvement and highlight the importance of examining child maltreatment as a point of prevention and intervention efforts for these youth.

Suggested Citation

  • Modrowski, Crosby A. & Chaplo, Shannon D. & Kerig, Patricia K., 2023. "Youth Dually-Involved in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems: Varying definitions and their associations with trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress, & offending," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:150:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923001937
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923001937
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tam, Christina C. & Abrams, Laura S. & Freisthler, Bridget & Ryan, Joseph P., 2016. "Juvenile justice sentencing: Do gender and child welfare involvement matter?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 60-65.
    2. Segura, Anna & Pereda, Noemí & Abad, Judit & Guilera, Georgina, 2015. "Victimization and polyvictimization among Spanish youth protected by the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 105-112.
    3. Lee, Sei-Young & Villagrana, Margarita, 2015. "Differences in risk and protective factors between crossover and non-crossover youth in juvenile justice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 18-27.
    4. Euser, Saskia & Alink, Lenneke R.A. & Tharner, Anne & van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. & Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., 2014. "Out of home placement to promote safety? The prevalence of physical abuse in residential and foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 64-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Indias, Sílvia & Arruabarrena, Ignacia & De Paúl, Joaquín, 2019. "Child maltreatment, sexual and peer victimization experiences among adolescents in residential care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 267-273.
    2. Good, Arla & Beaudry, Amy & Day, David, 2023. "Five key learnings from a court-based crossover youth program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Dierkhising, Carly B. & Eastman, Andrea Lane & Chan, Kristine, 2023. "Juvenile justice and child welfare dual system involvement among females with and without histories of commercial sexual exploitation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Daniel Scott & Natalie Goulette, 2023. "Caregiver Type and Gang Involvement: A Comparison of Female and Male Gang Members," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Pires, Ana Rita & Almeida, Telma Catarina, 2023. "Impact of poly-victimization and resilience on anxiety: Delinquent and non-delinquent youth samples," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Almeida, Telma Catarina & Ramos, Catarina & Brito, José & Cardoso, Jorge, 2020. "The juvenile victimization questionnaire: Psychometric properties and poly-victimization among Portuguese youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Hirsch, Rebecca A. & Dierkhising, Carly B. & Herz, Denise C., 2018. "Educational risk, recidivism, and service access among youth involved in both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 72-80.
    8. Nwabuzor Ogbonnaya, Ijeoma & Villodas, Miguel T. & Ciro, Dianne & Turnlund Carver, Ann, 2022. "Cumulative victimization and number of sexual partners among youth involved with child welfare: Externalizing and internalizing problems as mediators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Kind, Nina & Seker, Süheyla & d'Huart, Delfine & Bürgin, Dina & Jenkel, Nils & Boonmann, Cyril & Habersaat, Stéphanie & Urben, Sébastien & Fegert, Jörg M. & Clemens, Vera & Bürgin, David & Schmid, Mar, 2023. "High-risk substance use and psychosocial functioning in young adult care leavers: Findings from a 10-year follow-up study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Lee, Sei-Young & Rhee, Siyon & Villagrana, Margarita, 2018. "Change in delinquency over time between adolescents with and without maltreatment experiences: Attachment and the school's role," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 110-119.
    11. Barnes-Lee, Ashlee R. & Petkus, Amber, 2023. "A scoping review of strengths-based risk and needs assessments for youth involved in the juvenile legal system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    12. Mazzone, Angela & Nocentini, Annalaura & Menesini, Ersilia, 2019. "Bullying in residential care for children: Qualitative findings from five European countries," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 451-460.
    13. Blake, Austin J. & Tung, Irene & Langley, Audra K. & Waterman, Jill M., 2018. "Substance use in youth adopted from foster care: Developmental mechanisms of risk," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 264-272.
    14. Suárez-Soto, Elizabeth & Guilera, Georgina & Pereda, Noemí, 2018. "Victimization and suicidality among adolescents in child and youth-serving systems in Spain," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 383-389.
    15. Edwards, Travonne & Laylor, Andre & King, Bryn & Parada, Henry, 2023. "When home reminds me of jail: The carceral nature of out-of-home care for Black youth in Ontario’s child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Seker, Süheyla & Habersaat, Stéphanie & Boonmann, Cyril & Palix, Julie & Jenkel, Nils & Fischer, Sophia & Fegert, Jörg M. & Kölch, Michael & Schmeck, Klaus & Schmid, Marc, 2021. "Substance-use disorders among child welfare and juvenile justice adolescents in residential care: The role of childhood adversities and impulsive behavior," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    17. Baidawi, Susan & Ball, Rubini, 2023. "Child protection and youth offending: Differences in youth criminal court-involved children by dual system involvement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    18. Narendorf, Sarah C. & Brydon, Daphne M. & Santa Maria, Diane & Bender, Kimberly & Ferguson, Kristin M. & Hsu, Hsun-Ta & Barman-Adhikari, Anamika & Shelton, Jama & Petering, Robin, 2020. "System involvement among young adults experiencing homelessness: Characteristics of four system-involved subgroups and relationship to risk outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Segura, Anna & Pereda, Noemí & Abad, Judit & Guilera, Georgina, 2015. "Victimization and polyvictimization among Spanish youth protected by the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 105-112.
    20. Zanoni, Lee & Warburton, Wayne & Bussey, Kay & McMaugh, Anne, 2014. "Are all fathers in child protection families uncommitted, uninvolved and unable to change?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 83-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:150:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923001937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.