IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v107y2019ics0190740918305656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The content validity and usability of a child safety assessment instrument

Author

Listed:
  • Vial, Annemiek
  • van der Put, Claudia
  • Stams, Geert Jan J.M.
  • Assink, Mark

Abstract

Most child welfare professionals use safety assessment instruments to determine a child’s immediate safety. Surprisingly, the content validity of these instruments has hardly been examined, even though this provides valuable and essential information on their quality. Therefore, the aim of this manuscript was to examine the content validity and usability of a Dutch child safety assessment instrument by conducting two complementary qualitative studies. In Study 1, clinical professionals using the instrument (n = 15) were interviewed on what aspects of immediate child safety they considered essential to assess and on the usability of the instrument. In Study 2, other clinical and non-clinical experts on immediate child safety (n = 18) were interviewed on what aspects of immediate child safety they considered essential. All immediate child safety threats measured in the instrument were considered important, but the participants indicated that several additional threats should be measured for properly determining a child’s immediate safety. Examples of threats missed by the participants were whether or not a child is being emotionally abused, and whether harm is inflicted upon the child by anyone other than the primary caretakers. In general, the tool was considered useful for determining the immediate child safety, but participants provided recommendations for improvement for instance on the wording of items, the descriptions of items, and the (potential) outcomes of the instrument. The content validity of the child safety assessment instrument could be strengthened by adding several threats to the instrument. General implications of the results for the safety assessment instrument are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Vial, Annemiek & van der Put, Claudia & Stams, Geert Jan J.M. & Assink, Mark, 2019. "The content validity and usability of a child safety assessment instrument," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:107:y:2019:i:c:s0190740918305656
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740918305656
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fuller, Tamara L. & Wells, Susan J., 2003. "Predicting Maltreatment Recurrence among CPS Cases with Alcohol and Other Drug Involvement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 553-569, July.
    2. Fuller, Tamara L. & Wells, Susan J. & Cotton, Edward E., 2001. "Predictors of maltreatment recurrence at two milestones in the life of a case," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 49-78, January.
    3. van der Put, Claudia E. & Assink, Mark & Stams, Geert Jan J.M., 2016. "Predicting relapse of problematic child-rearing situations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 288-295.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vial, Annemiek & Assink, Mark & Stams, Geert Jan J.M. & van der Put, Claudia, 2020. "Safety assessment in child welfare: A comparison of instruments," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vial, Annemiek & Assink, Mark & Stams, Geert Jan J.M. & van der Put, Claudia, 2020. "Safety assessment in child welfare: A comparison of instruments," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Annemiek Vial & Mark Assink & Geert Jan Stams & Claudia Van der Put, 2021. "Child Safety Assessment: Do Instrument-Based Decisions Concur with Decisions of Expert Panels?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Fuller, Tamara L., 2005. "Child safety at reunification: A case-control study of maltreatment recurrence following return home from substitute care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(12), pages 1293-1306, December.
    4. Kahn, Jessica M. & Schwalbe, Craig, 2010. "The timing to and risk factors associated with child welfare system recidivism at two decision-making points," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1035-1044, July.
    5. Brook, Jody & McDonald, Tom, 2009. "The impact of parental substance abuse on the stability of family reunifications from foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 193-198, February.
    6. Ben-David, Vered, 2016. "Substance-abusing parents and their children in termination of parental rights cases in Israel," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 94-100.
    7. Slayter, Elspeth M. & Jensen, Jordan, 2019. "Parents with intellectual disabilities in the child protection system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 297-304.
    8. Palusci, Vincent J., 2011. "Risk factors and services for child maltreatment among infants and young children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1374-1382, August.
    9. Hélie, Sonia & Bouchard, Camil, 2010. "Recurrent reporting of child maltreatment: State of knowledge and avenues for research," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 416-422, March.
    10. Dijkstra, Sharon & Creemers, Hanneke E. & Asscher, Jessica J. & Deković, Maja & Stams, Geert Jan J.M., 2017. "Family group conferencing in Dutch child welfare: Which families are most likely to organize a family group conference?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 255-263.
    11. Snyder, Susan M. & Merritt, Darcey H., 2014. "Do childhood experiences of neglect affect delinquency among child welfare involved-youth?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 64-71.
    12. Bae, Hwa-ok & Solomon, Phyllis L. & Gelles, Richard J., 2009. "Multiple child maltreatment recurrence relative to single recurrence and no recurrence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 617-624, June.
    13. Hélie, Sonia & Poirier, Marie-Andrée & Turcotte, Daniel, 2014. "Risk of maltreatment recurrence after exiting substitute care: Impact of placement characteristics," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 257-264.
    14. Shlonsky, Aron & Gambrill, Eileen, 2001. "The assessment and management of risk in child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-2, January.
    15. Bae, Hwa-Ok & Solomon, Phyllis L. & Gelles, Richard J., 2007. "Abuse type and substantiation status varying by recurrence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 856-869, July.
    16. Dauber, Sarah & Neighbors, Charles & Dasaro, Chris & Riordan, Annette & Morgenstern, Jon, 2012. "Impact of intensive case management on child welfare system involvement for substance-dependent parenting women on public assistance," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1359-1366.
    17. Palusci, Vincent J. & Smith, Elliott G. & Paneth, Nigel, 2005. "Predicting and responding to physical abuse in young children using NCANDS," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 667-682, June.
    18. Duindam, Hanne M. & Vial, Annemiek & Bouwmeester-Landweer, Merian B.R. & van der Put, Claudia E., 2023. "Differences and similarities between mothers’ and fathers’ risk factors for child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    19. Debra A. Strong & Russell Cole & Angela V. D'Angelo & Juliette Henke, "undated". "2012 and 2014 Regional Partnership Grants to Increase the Well-Being of and to Improve the Permanency Outcomes for Children Affected by Substance Abuse: Third Annual Report to Congress," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 25fb6c26bc6a435fbfa9abfd8, Mathematica Policy Research.
    20. Delfabbro, Paul & Borgas, Mignon & Rogers, Nancy & Jeffreys, Helen & Wilson, Ros, 2009. "The social and family backgrounds of infants in South Australian out-of-home care 2000-2005: Predictors of subsequent abuse notifications," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 219-226, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:107:y:2019:i:c:s0190740918305656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.