IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v66y2013icp19-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inference for variograms

Author

Listed:
  • Bowman, Adrian W.
  • Crujeiras, Rosa M.

Abstract

The empirical variogram is a standard tool in the investigation and modelling of spatial covariance. However, its properties can be difficult to identify and exploit in the context of exploring the characteristics of individual datasets. This is particularly true when seeking to move beyond description towards inferential statements about the structure of the spatial covariance which may be present. A robust form of empirical variogram based on a fourth-root transformation is used. This takes advantage of the normal approximation which gives an excellent description of the variation exhibited on this scale. Calculations of mean, variance and covariance of the binned empirical variogram then allow useful computations such as confidence intervals to be added to the underlying estimator. The comparison of variograms for different datasets provides an illustration of this. The suitability of simplifying assumptions such as isotropy and stationarity can then also be investigated through the construction of appropriate test statistics and the distributional calculations required in the associated p-values can be performed through quadratic form methods. Examples of the use of these methods in assessing the form of spatial covariance present in datasets are shown, both through hypothesis tests and in graphical form. A simulation study explores the properties of the tests while pollution data on mosses in Galicia (north-west Spain) are used to provide a real data illustration.

Suggested Citation

  • Bowman, Adrian W. & Crujeiras, Rosa M., 2013. "Inference for variograms," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 19-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:66:y:2013:i:c:p:19-31
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.02.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947313000832
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2013.02.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shapiro, A. & Botha, J. D., 1991. "Variogram fitting with a general class of conditionally nonnegative definite functions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 87-96, January.
    2. Hyon‐Jung Kim & Dennis D. Boos, 2004. "Variance Estimation in Spatial Regression Using a Non‐parametric Semivariogram Based on Residuals," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 31(3), pages 387-401, September.
    3. García-Soidán, Pilar H. & González-Manteiga, Wenceslao & Febrero-Bande, Manuel, 2003. "Local linear regression estimation of the variogram," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 169-179, August.
    4. Bowman, A. W. & Azzalini, A., 2003. "Computational aspects of nonparametric smoothing with illustrations from the sm library," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 545-560, April.
    5. A. Diblasi & A. W. Bowman, 2001. "On the Use of the Variogram in Checking for Independence in Spatial Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 211-218, March.
    6. Fuentes, Montserrat, 2005. "A formal test for nonstationarity of spatial stochastic processes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 30-54, September.
    7. Adrian Bowman & Stuart Young, 1996. "Graphical Comparison of Nonparametric Curves," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 45(1), pages 83-98, March.
    8. Gerda Claeskens & Tatyana Krivobokova & Jean D. Opsomer, 2009. "Asymptotic properties of penalized spline estimators," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 529-544.
    9. Yongtao Guan & Michael Sherman & James A. Calvin, 2004. "A Nonparametric Test for Spatial Isotropy Using Subsampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 810-821, January.
    10. Crujeiras, Rosa M. & Fernández-Casal, Rubén & González-Manteiga, Wenceslao, 2008. "An L2 -test for comparing spatial spectral densities," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(15), pages 2543-2551, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "Rejoinder on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 442-447, September.
    2. Liu, Jinfu & Ren, Guorui & Wan, Jie & Guo, Yufeng & Yu, Daren, 2016. "Variogram time-series analysis of wind speed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 483-491.
    3. Andrea Meilán-Vila & Jean D. Opsomer & Mario Francisco-Fernández & Rosa M. Crujeiras, 2020. "A goodness-of-fit test for regression models with spatially correlated errors," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(3), pages 728-749, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crujeiras, Rosa M. & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2010. "Least squares estimation of nonlinear spatial trends," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 452-465, February.
    2. Soutir Bandyopadhyay & Suhasini Subba Rao, 2017. "A test for stationarity for irregularly spaced spatial data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 95-123, January.
    3. Castillo-Páez, Sergio & Fernández-Casal, Rubén & García-Soidán, Pilar, 2019. "A nonparametric bootstrap method for spatial data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-15.
    4. Hidalgo, Javier, 2009. "Goodness of fit for lattice processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(2), pages 113-128, August.
    5. Blöchl, Andreas, 2014. "Trend Estimation with Penalized Splines as Mixed Models for Series with Structural Breaks," Discussion Papers in Economics 18446, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    6. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "Rejoinder on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 442-447, September.
    7. Chen, Haiqiang & Fang, Ying & Li, Yingxing, 2015. "Estimation And Inference For Varying-Coefficient Models With Nonstationary Regressors Using Penalized Splines," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 753-777, August.
    8. Dyogo Lesniewski Ribeiro & Tamara Cantú Maltauro & Luciana Pagliosa Carvalho Guedes & Miguel Angel Uribe-Opazo & Gustavo Henrique Dalposso, 2024. "Directional Differences in Thematic Maps of Soil Chemical Attributes with Geometric Anisotropy," Stats, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Feng, Yuanhua & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl, 2020. "A data-driven P-spline smoother and the P-Spline-GARCH models," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2020-016, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    10. Manuel Wiesenfarth & Carlos Matías Hisgen & Thomas Kneib & Carmen Cadarso-Suarez, 2014. "Bayesian Nonparametric Instrumental Variables Regression Based on Penalized Splines and Dirichlet Process Mixtures," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 468-482, July.
    11. Stefan Sperlich, 2009. "Comments on: A review on empirical likelihood methods for regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(3), pages 448-451, November.
    12. I. Gijbels & I. Prosdocimi & G. Claeskens, 2010. "Nonparametric estimation of mean and dispersion functions in extended generalized linear models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(3), pages 580-608, November.
    13. Hulin Wu & Hongqi Xue & Arun Kumar, 2012. "Numerical Discretization-Based Estimation Methods for Ordinary Differential Equation Models via Penalized Spline Smoothing with Applications in Biomedical Research," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 344-352, June.
    14. Marco H. Benedetti & Veronica J. Berrocal & Naveen N. Narisetty, 2022. "Identifying regions of inhomogeneities in spatial processes via an M‐RA and mixture priors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 798-811, June.
    15. Takuma Yoshida & Kanta Naito, 2014. "Asymptotics for penalised splines in generalised additive models," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 269-289, June.
    16. Matthew Thorpe & Adam M. Johansen, 2018. "Pointwise convergence in probability of general smoothing splines," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(4), pages 717-744, August.
    17. Takuma Yoshida, 2019. "Two stage smoothing in additive models with missing covariates," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 1803-1826, December.
    18. Andrada Ivanescu & Ana-Maria Staicu & Fabian Scheipl & Sonja Greven, 2015. "Penalized function-on-function regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 539-568, June.
    19. Takuma Yoshida, 2021. "Additive models for extremal quantile regression with Pareto-type distributions," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(1), pages 103-134, March.
    20. Christian Schellhase & Göran Kauermann, 2012. "Density estimation and comparison with a penalized mixture approach," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 757-777, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:66:y:2013:i:c:p:19-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.