IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v56y2012i6p2086-2096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effective designs for trials with discrete-time survival endpoints

Author

Listed:
  • Jóźwiak, Katarzyna
  • Moerbeek, Mirjam

Abstract

In studies on event occurrence, the timing of events may be measured continuously using thin precise units or discretely using time periods. The design of trials with continuous-time survival endpoints has been studied for years, but very little is known about the design of trials with discrete-time survival endpoints. The optimal designs for trials where observations are recorded at discrete points in time is calculated using the generalized linear model and Weibull distribution. Applying a cost function, the optimal number of subjects and time periods are found in such a way that a sufficient power level is achieved at a minimal cost or the power level is maximized for a fixed budget. Taking the budget for a trial and the cost ratio between recruiting a new subject and obtaining a measurement per subject into account, it is observed that the cost ratio and the shape of the survival function have the greatest influence on the optimal design.

Suggested Citation

  • Jóźwiak, Katarzyna & Moerbeek, Mirjam, 2012. "Cost-effective designs for trials with discrete-time survival endpoints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 2086-2096.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:6:p:2086-2096
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.12.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947311004531
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2011.12.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lima Passos, Valéria & Tan, Frans E.S. & Berger, Martijn P.F., 2011. "Cost-efficiency considerations in the choice of a microarray platform for time course experimental designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 944-954, January.
    2. Hashimoto, Elizabeth M. & Ortega, Edwin M.M. & Paula, Gilberto A. & Barreto, Mauricio L., 2011. "Regression models for grouped survival data: Estimation and sensitivity analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 993-1007, February.
    3. Tekle, Fetene B. & Tan, Frans E.S. & Berger, Martijn P.F., 2008. "Maximin D-optimal designs for binary longitudinal responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5253-5262, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao-Dong Zhou & Yun-Juan Wang & Rong-Xian Yue, 2021. "Optimal designs for discrete-time survival models with random effects," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 300-332, April.
    2. Safarkhani, Maryam & Moerbeek, Mirjam, 2014. "The influence of a covariate on optimal designs in longitudinal studies with discrete-time survival endpoints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 217-226.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maryam Safarkhani & Mirjam Moerbeek, 2016. "D-optimal designs for a continuous predictor in longitudinal trials with discrete-time survival endpoints," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 70(2), pages 146-171, May.
    2. Fetene B. Tekle & Dereje W. Gudicha & Jeroen K. Vermunt, 2016. "Power analysis for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test for the number of classes in latent class models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(2), pages 209-224, June.
    3. H. Abebe & F. Tan & G. Breukelen & M. Berger, 2014. "Robustness of Bayesian D-optimal design for the logistic mixed model against misspecification of autocorrelation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1667-1690, December.
    4. Elizabeth Hashimoto & Gauss Cordeiro & Edwin Ortega, 2013. "The new Neyman type A beta Weibull model with long-term survivors," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 933-954, June.
    5. Blanco-Fernández, Angela & Corral, Norberto & González-Rodríguez, Gil, 2011. "Estimation of a flexible simple linear model for interval data based on set arithmetic," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 2568-2578, September.
    6. Wiens, Douglas P., 2010. "Robustness of design for the testing of lack of fit and for estimation in binary response models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3371-3378, December.
    7. Ueckert, Sebastian & Mentré, France, 2017. "A new method for evaluation of the Fisher information matrix for discrete mixed effect models using Monte Carlo sampling and adaptive Gaussian quadrature," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 203-219.
    8. Sheng Wu & Weng Kee Wong & Catherine M. Crespi, 2017. "Maximin optimal designs for cluster randomized trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 916-926, September.
    9. Karvanen, Juha, 2009. "Approximate cost-efficient sequential designs for binary response models with application to switching measurements," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1167-1176, February.
    10. Hong-Yan Jiang & Rong-Xian Yue, 2019. "Pseudo-Bayesian D-optimal designs for longitudinal Poisson mixed models with correlated errors," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 71-87, March.
    11. Safarkhani, Maryam & Moerbeek, Mirjam, 2014. "The influence of a covariate on optimal designs in longitudinal studies with discrete-time survival endpoints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 217-226.
    12. Xiao-Dong Zhou & Yun-Juan Wang & Rong-Xian Yue, 2021. "Optimal designs for discrete-time survival models with random effects," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 300-332, April.
    13. Elton G. Aráujo & Julio C. S. Vasconcelos & Denize P. Santos & Edwin M. M. Ortega & Dalton Souza & João P. F. Zanetoni, 2023. "The Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Semiparametric Regression Model: Application to Number of Failing Grades Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 991-1006, August.
    14. Abebe, Haftom T. & Tan, Frans E.S. & Van Breukelen, Gerard J.P. & Berger, Martijn P.F., 2014. "Bayesian D-optimal designs for the two parameter logistic mixed effects model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1066-1076.
    15. Candel, Math J.J.M. & Van Breukelen, Gerard J.P., 2010. "D-optimality of unequal versus equal cluster sizes for mixed effects linear regression analysis of randomized trials with clusters in one treatment arm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 1906-1920, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:6:p:2086-2096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.