IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v56y2012i5p1115-1130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stratified additive Poisson models: Computational methods and applications in clinical epidemiology

Author

Listed:
  • Marschner, Ian C.
  • Gillett, Alexandra C.
  • O’Connell, Rachel L.

Abstract

Risk factor models in clinical epidemiology are important for identifying individuals at high risk of poor health outcomes and for guiding intervention strategies to reduce risk. Such models are often based on generalised linear models (GLM) with a multiplicative risk, rate or odds assumption. However, in practice some risk factors may act additively, in which case the use of a multiplicative model will lead to spurious interactions among risk factors. Computational methodology is developed for fitting non-GLM Poisson regression models that have an additive component with multiplicative stratification. These stratified additive Poisson models, which can also be applied to binomial data, provide an additive–multiplicative framework that allows greater flexibility than multiplicative models. Non-negativity constraints and high dimensionality are dealt with using an Expectation-Conditional-Maximisation (ECM) algorithm that oscillates between the multiplicative and additive components of the model. As well as providing highly stable convergence properties in a potentially unstable setting, the method allows flexible modelling features such as unspecified isotonic regression functions. The methodology is illustrated with an analysis of heart attack mortality in a large clinical trial, and it is found that the combination of additive and multiplicative components allows a more parsimonious risk factor model by removing the need for interaction terms. R code to implement the method is provided as supplementary material.

Suggested Citation

  • Marschner, Ian C. & Gillett, Alexandra C. & O’Connell, Rachel L., 2012. "Stratified additive Poisson models: Computational methods and applications in clinical epidemiology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1115-1130.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:5:p:1115-1130
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.08.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947311002878
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2011.08.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Devarajan, Karthik & Ebrahimi, Nader, 2011. "A semi-parametric generalization of the Cox proportional hazards regression model: Inference and applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 667-676, January.
    2. Torben Martinussen, 2002. "A flexible additive multiplicative hazard model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(2), pages 283-298, June.
    3. O'Connell, Rachel L. & Malcolm Hudson, H., 2009. "Risk of mortality after acute myocardial infarction: Performance of model updating methods for application in different geographical regions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 834-846, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chengyuan Lu & Jelle Goeman & Hein Putter, 2023. "Maximum likelihood estimation in the additive hazards model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1646-1656, September.
    2. Colubi, Ana & Domínguez-Menchero, J. Santos & González-Rodríguez, Gil, 2014. "Testing constancy in monotone response models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 45-56.
    3. Donoghoe Mark W. & Marschner Ian C., 2015. "Flexible Regression Models for Rate Differences, Risk Differences and Relative Risks," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 91-108, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Yan & Jian Huang, 2012. "Model Selection for Cox Models with Time-Varying Coefficients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 419-428, June.
    2. Miao Han & Liuquan Sun & Yutao Liu & Jun Zhu, 2018. "Joint analysis of recurrent event data with additive–multiplicative hazards model for the terminal event time," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(5), pages 523-547, July.
    3. Chin-Tsang Chiang & Mei-Cheng Wang, 2009. "Varying-coefficient model for the occurrence rate function of recurrent events," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 61(1), pages 197-213, March.
    4. Ruixuan Liu, 2020. "A competing risks model with time‐varying heterogeneity and simultaneous failure," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(2), pages 535-577, May.
    5. Zhuowei Sun & Hongyuan Cao & Li Chen, 2022. "Regression analysis of additive hazards model with sparse longitudinal covariates," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 263-281, April.
    6. Kraus, David, 2004. "Goodness-of-fit inference for the Cox-Aalen additive-multiplicative regression model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 285-298, December.
    7. Jiajia Zhang & Timothy Hanson & Haiming Zhou, 2019. "Bayes factors for choosing among six common survival models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 361-379, April.
    8. M. Avendaño & M. Pardo, 2016. "A semiparametric generalized proportional hazards model for right-censored data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 68(2), pages 353-384, April.
    9. Chin-Tsang Chiang, 2011. "A more flexible joint latent model for longitudinal and survival time data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 151-170, March.
    10. Xi Ning & Yinghao Pan & Yanqing Sun & Peter B. Gilbert, 2023. "A semiparametric Cox–Aalen transformation model with censored data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3111-3125, December.
    11. Kulinskaya, Elena & Gitsels, Lisanne A. & Bakbergenuly, Ilyas & Wright, Nigel R., 2020. "Calculation of changes in life expectancy based on proportional hazards model of an intervention," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 27-35.
    12. Gradowska, P.L. & Cooke, R.M., 2012. "Least squares type estimation for Cox regression model and specification error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 2288-2302.
    13. Osman, Muhtarjan & Ghosh, Sujit K., 2012. "Nonparametric regression models for right-censored data using Bernstein polynomials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 559-573.
    14. Meyer, Sebastian & Held, Leonhard & Höhle, Michael, 2017. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Epidemic Phenomena Using the R Package surveillance," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 77(i11).
    15. Giada Adelfio & Marcello Chiodi, 2021. "Including covariates in a space-time point process with application to seismicity," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 947-971, September.
    16. Suraj Peri & Karthik Devarajan & Dong-Hua Yang & Alfred G Knudson & Siddharth Balachandran, 2013. "Meta-Analysis Identifies NF-κB as a Therapeutic Target in Renal Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-1, October.
    17. Nils Lid Hjort & Emil Aas Stoltenberg, 2023. "The partly parametric and partly nonparametric additive risk model," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 372-402, April.
    18. Devarajan, Karthik & Ebrahimi, Nader, 2013. "On penalized likelihood estimation for a non-proportional hazards regression model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(7), pages 1703-1710.
    19. Frank Eriksson & Jianing Li & Thomas Scheike & Mei‐Jie Zhang, 2015. "The proportional odds cumulative incidence model for competing risks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 687-695, September.
    20. Torben Martinussen & Odd O. Aalen & Thomas H. Scheike, 2008. "The Mizon–Richard Encompassing Test for the Cox and Aalen Additive Hazards Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 164-171, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:5:p:1115-1130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.