IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v71y2015i3p687-695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The proportional odds cumulative incidence model for competing risks

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Eriksson
  • Jianing Li
  • Thomas Scheike
  • Mei‐Jie Zhang

Abstract

We suggest an estimator for the proportional odds cumulative incidence model for competing risks data. The key advantage of this model is that the regression parameters have the simple and useful odds ratio interpretation. The model has been considered by many authors, but it is rarely used in practice due to the lack of reliable estimation procedures. We suggest such procedures and show that their performance improve considerably on existing methods. We also suggest a goodness‐of‐fit test for the proportional odds assumption. We derive the large sample properties and provide estimators of the asymptotic variance. The method is illustrated by an application in a bone marrow transplant study and the finite‐sample properties are assessed by simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Eriksson & Jianing Li & Thomas Scheike & Mei‐Jie Zhang, 2015. "The proportional odds cumulative incidence model for competing risks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 687-695, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:71:y:2015:i:3:p:687-695
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12330
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malka Gorfine & David M. Zucker & Li Hsu, 2006. "Prospective survival analysis with a general semiparametric shared frailty model: A pseudo full likelihood approach," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(3), pages 735-741, September.
    2. Thomas H. Scheike & Mei‐Jie Zhang, 2007. "Direct Modelling of Regression Effects for Transition Probabilities in Multistate Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(1), pages 17-32, March.
    3. John P. Klein & Per Kragh Andersen, 2005. "Regression Modeling of Competing Risks Data Based on Pseudovalues of the Cumulative Incidence Function," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 223-229, March.
    4. Per Kragh Andersen, 2003. "Generalised linear models for correlated pseudo-observations, with applications to multi-state models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(1), pages 15-27, March.
    5. Torben Martinussen, 2002. "A flexible additive multiplicative hazard model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(2), pages 283-298, June.
    6. J. P. Fine, 1999. "Analysing competing risks data with transformation models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(4), pages 817-830.
    7. Torben Martinussen & Thomas H. Scheike & David M. Zucker, 2011. "The Aalen additive gamma frailty hazards model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(4), pages 831-843.
    8. Kani Chen, 2002. "Semiparametric analysis of transformation models with censored data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(3), pages 659-668, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank Eriksson & Thomas Scheike, 2015. "Additive gamma frailty models with applications to competing risks in related individuals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 677-686, September.
    2. Yayuan Zhu & Ziqi Chen & Jerald F. Lawless, 2022. "Semiparametric analysis of interval‐censored failure time data with outcome‐dependent observation schemes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(1), pages 236-264, March.
    3. Annalisa Orenti & Patrizia Boracchi & Giuseppe Marano & Elia Biganzoli & Federico Ambrogi, 2022. "A pseudo-values regression model for non-fatal event free survival in the presence of semi-competing risks," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(3), pages 709-727, September.
    4. Erik T. Parner & Per K. Andersen & Morten Overgaard, 2020. "Cumulative risk regression in case–cohort studies using pseudo-observations," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 639-658, October.
    5. Su, Pei-Fang & Chi, Yunchan & Li, Chung-I & Shyr, Yu & Liao, Yi-De, 2011. "Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time for paired and clustered right-censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1617-1628, April.
    6. Zijing Yang & Chengfeng Zhang & Yawen Hou & Zheng Chen, 2023. "Analysis of dynamic restricted mean survival time based on pseudo‐observations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3690-3700, December.
    7. Deresa, Negera Wakgari & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2020. "A multivariate normal regression model for survival data subject to different types of dependent censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Sangbum Choi & Xuelin Huang, 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimation of semiparametric mixture component models for competing risks data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 588-598, September.
    9. Jianbo Li & Minggao Gu & Tao Hu, 2012. "General partially linear varying-coefficient transformation models for ranking data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 1475-1488, January.
    10. M. A. Nicolaie & J. C. van Houwelingen & T. M. de Witte & H. Putter, 2013. "Dynamic Pseudo-Observations: A Robust Approach to Dynamic Prediction in Competing Risks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 1043-1052, December.
    11. Yuxue Jin & Tze Leung Lai, 2017. "A new approach to regression analysis of censored competing-risks data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 605-625, October.
    12. Xi Ning & Yinghao Pan & Yanqing Sun & Peter B. Gilbert, 2023. "A semiparametric Cox–Aalen transformation model with censored data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3111-3125, December.
    13. Wycinka Ewa, 2019. "Competing Risk Models of Default in the Presence of Early Repayments," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 99-120, June.
    14. Alina Schenk & Moritz Berger & Matthias Schmid, 2024. "Pseudo-value regression trees," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 439-471, April.
    15. Tianyu Zhan & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2019. "Semiparametric temporal process regression of survival-out-of-hospital," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 322-340, April.
    16. Li, Ruosha & Peng, Limin, 2014. "Varying coefficient subdistribution regression for left-truncated semi-competing risks data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 65-78.
    17. Gang Li & Qing Yang, 2016. "Joint Inference for Competing Risks Survival Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(515), pages 1289-1300, July.
    18. Per Kragh Andersen & Eva Nina Sparre Wandall & Maja Pohar Perme, 2022. "Inference for transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 585-604, October.
    19. Brent R. Logan & John P. Klein & Mei‐Jie Zhang, 2008. "Comparing Treatments in the Presence of Crossing Survival Curves: An Application to Bone Marrow Transplantation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 733-740, September.
    20. Klemen Pavlič & Torben Martinussen & Per Kragh Andersen, 2019. "Goodness of fit tests for estimating equations based on pseudo-observations," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 189-205, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:71:y:2015:i:3:p:687-695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.