IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v54y2010i2p585-597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Semi-parametric marginal models for hierarchical data and their corresponding full models

Author

Listed:
  • Molenberghs, Geert
  • Kenward, Michael G.

Abstract

Semi-parametrically specified models for multivariate, longitudinal, clustered, multi-level, and other hierarchical data, particularly for non-Gaussian outcomes, are ubiquitous because their parameters can most often be conveniently estimated using the important class of generalized estimating equations (GEE). The focus here is on marginal models, to be understood as models that condition neither on random effects nor on other outcomes, but merely on fixed covariates. In spite of their well-deserved popularity, concern could be raised as to whether such models can always be viewed as a partially specified version of a model with full distributional assumptions, or rather whether such a parent simply does not exist. It is shown, through the use of the hybrid marginal-conditional models, that the answer is affirmative. For conventional GEE with a working correlation structure, the Bahadur model is sometimes considered to be the natural parent candidate, but we show that this is a misconception. The result presented here, which is conceptual in nature, is valid whenever the exponential family is used for the semi-parametric specification, or when a straightforward transformation to an exponential family member is possible, implying validity for broad classes of binary, ordinal, nominal, and count data. The result is illustrated in the context of trivariate binary data. Further, as an illustration, many of the models considered are applied to data from a developmental toxicity study.

Suggested Citation

  • Molenberghs, Geert & Kenward, Michael G., 2010. "Semi-parametric marginal models for hierarchical data and their corresponding full models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 585-597, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:2:p:585-597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(09)00370-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. R. Cox, 1972. "The Analysis of Multivariate Binary Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 21(2), pages 113-120, June.
    2. Patrick J. Heagerty, 2002. "Marginalized Transition Models and Likelihood Inference for Longitudinal Categorical Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 342-351, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nooraee, Nazanin & Molenberghs, Geert & van den Heuvel, Edwin R., 2014. "GEE for longitudinal ordinal data: Comparing R-geepack, R-multgee, R-repolr, SAS-GENMOD, SPSS-GENLIN," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-83.
    2. I. R. C. Oliveira & G. Molenberghs & G. Verbeke & C. G. B. Demétrio & C. T. S. Dias, 2017. "Negative variance components for non-negative hierarchical data with correlation, over-, and/or underdispersion," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 1047-1063, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jason Roy & Michael J. Daniels, 2008. "A General Class of Pattern Mixture Models for Nonignorable Dropout with Many Possible Dropout Times," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 538-545, June.
    2. Kromidha, Endrit & Li, Matthew C., 2019. "Determinants of leadership in online social trading: A signaling theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 184-197.
    3. Kim, Chul & Jun, Duk Bin & Park, Sungho, 2018. "Capturing flexible correlations in multiple-discrete choice outcomes using copulas," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 34-59.
    4. Kenneth J. Wilkins & Garrett M. Fitzmaurice, 2006. "A Hybrid Model for Nonignorable Dropout in Longitudinal Binary Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 168-176, March.
    5. Richards, Timothy J. & Hamilton, Stephen F. & Yonezawa, Koichi, 2018. "Retail Market Power in a Shopping Basket Model of Supermarket Competition," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 328-342.
    6. M.J. Daniels & C. Wang & B.H. Marcus, 2014. "Fully Bayesian inference under ignorable missingness in the presence of auxiliary covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 62-72, March.
    7. Timothy Tyler Brown & Juan Pablo Atal, 2019. "How robust are reference pricing studies on outpatient medical procedures? Three different preprocessing techniques applied to difference‐in differences," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 280-298, February.
    8. L. Sun & M. K. Clayton, 2008. "Bayesian Analysis of Crossclassified Spatial Data with Autocorrelation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 74-84, March.
    9. Jonathan S. Schildcrout & Patrick J. Heagerty, 2007. "Marginalized Models for Moderate to Long Series of Longitudinal Binary Response Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 322-331, June.
    10. Francesco Bartolucci & Claudia Pigini, 2018. "Partial effects estimation for fixed-effects logit panel data models," Working Papers 431, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    11. Brajendra C. Sutradhar, 2022. "Fixed versus Mixed Effects Based Marginal Models for Clustered Correlated Binary Data: an Overview on Advances and Challenges," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 259-302, May.
    12. M. H. Goncalves & A. Azzalini, 2008. "Using Markov chains for marginal modelling of binary longitudinal data in an exact likelihood approach," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(2), pages 157-181.
    13. Francesco Bartolucci & Claudia Pigini, 2017. "Granger causality in dynamic binary short panel data models," Working Papers 421, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    14. Battey, H.S. & Cox, D.R., 2022. "Some aspects of non-standard multivariate analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Keunbaik Lee & Michael J. Daniels, 2007. "A Class of Markov Models for Longitudinal Ordinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1060-1067, December.
    16. Keon Lee, Seong, 2005. "On generalized multivariate decision tree by using GEE," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 1105-1119, June.
    17. Harald Hruschka, 2022. "Analyzing joint brand purchases by conditional restricted Boltzmann machines," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1117-1145, May.
    18. Enrico A. Colosimo & Maria Arlene Fausto & Marta Afonso Freitas & Jorge Andrade Pinto, 2012. "Practical modeling strategies for unbalanced longitudinal data analysis," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(9), pages 2005-2013, May.
    19. Ivy Jansen & Geert Molenberghs, 2008. "A flexible marginal modelling strategy for non‐monotone missing data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(2), pages 347-373, April.
    20. Miranda, Alfonso & Trivedi, Pravin K., 2020. "Econometric Models of Fertility," IZA Discussion Papers 13357, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:2:p:585-597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.