IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v144y2020ics0167947319302385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structured analysis of the high-dimensional FMR model

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Mengque
  • Zhang, Qingzhao
  • Fang, Kuangnan
  • Ma, Shuangge

Abstract

The finite mixture of regression (FMR) model is a popular tool for accommodating data heterogeneity. In the analysis of FMR models with high-dimensional covariates, it is necessary to conduct regularized estimation and identify important covariates rather than noises. In the literature, there has been a lack of attention paid to the differences among important covariates, which can lead to the underlying structure of covariate effects. Specifically, important covariates can be classified into two types: those that behave the same in different subpopulations and those that behave differently. It is of interest to conduct structured analysis to identify such structures, which will enable researchers to better understand covariates and their associations with outcomes. Specifically, the FMR model with high-dimensional covariates is considered. A structured penalization approach is developed for regularized estimation, selection of important variables, and, equally importantly, identification of the underlying covariate effect structure. The proposed approach can be effectively realized, and its statistical properties are rigorously established. Simulation demonstrates its superiority over alternatives. In the analysis of cancer gene expression data, interesting models/structures missed by the existing analysis are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Mengque & Zhang, Qingzhao & Fang, Kuangnan & Ma, Shuangge, 2020. "Structured analysis of the high-dimensional FMR model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:144:y:2020:i:c:s0167947319302385
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2019.106883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947319302385
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2019.106883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lloyd-Jones, Luke R. & Nguyen, Hien D. & McLachlan, Geoffrey J., 2018. "A globally convergent algorithm for lasso-penalized mixture of linear regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 19-38.
    2. Yuan Huang & Qingzhao Zhang & Sanguo Zhang & Jian Huang & Shuangge Ma, 2017. "Promoting Similarity of Sparsity Structures in Integrative Analysis With Penalization," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(517), pages 342-350, January.
    3. Abbas Khalili & Shili Lin, 2013. "Regularization in Finite Mixture of Regression Models with Diverging Number of Parameters," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 436-446, June.
    4. Robert Tibshirani & Michael Saunders & Saharon Rosset & Ji Zhu & Keith Knight, 2005. "Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(1), pages 91-108, February.
    5. Michel Wedel & Wayne DeSarbo, 1995. "A mixture likelihood approach for generalized linear models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 12(1), pages 21-55, March.
    6. Hafidi, Bezza & Mkhadri, Abdallah, 2010. "The Kullback information criterion for mixture regression models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(9-10), pages 807-815, May.
    7. Khalili, Abbas & Chen, Jiahua, 2007. "Variable Selection in Finite Mixture of Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 1025-1038, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanguas Parra, Paola & Hauenstein, Christian & Oei, Pao-Yu, 2021. "The death valley of coal – Modelling COVID-19 recovery scenarios for steam coal markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Li & Chun Yu & Yize Zhao & Weixin Yao & Robert H. Aseltine & Kun Chen, 2022. "Pursuing sources of heterogeneity in modeling clustered population," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 716-729, June.
    2. Sakyajit Bhattacharya & Paul McNicholas, 2014. "A LASSO-penalized BIC for mixture model selection," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(1), pages 45-61, March.
    3. Gerhard Tutz & Margret-Ruth Oelker, 2017. "Modelling Clustered Heterogeneity: Fixed Effects, Random Effects and Mixtures," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(2), pages 204-227, August.
    4. Qin, Xing & Hu, Jianhua & Ma, Shuangge & Wu, Mengyun, 2024. "Estimation of multiple networks with common structures in heterogeneous subgroups," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Qingguo Tang & R. J. Karunamuni, 2018. "Robust variable selection for finite mixture regression models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(3), pages 489-521, June.
    6. Baihua He & Tingyan Zhong & Jian Huang & Yanyan Liu & Qingzhao Zhang & Shuangge Ma, 2021. "Histopathological imaging‐based cancer heterogeneity analysis via penalized fusion with model averaging," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1397-1408, December.
    7. Lloyd-Jones, Luke R. & Nguyen, Hien D. & McLachlan, Geoffrey J., 2018. "A globally convergent algorithm for lasso-penalized mixture of linear regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 19-38.
    8. Dunstan, Piers K. & Foster, Scott D. & Darnell, Ross, 2011. "Model based grouping of species across environmental gradients," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 955-963.
    9. Lee, Kuo-Jung & Feldkircher, Martin & Chen, Yi-Chi, 2021. "Variable selection in finite mixture of regression models with an unknown number of components," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    11. Mkhadri, Abdallah & Ouhourane, Mohamed, 2013. "An extended variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithm for correlated variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 631-644.
    12. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    13. Li, Houjian & Tang, Mengqian & Cao, Andi & Guo, Lili, 2024. "How to reduce firm pollution discharges: Does political leaders' gender matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    14. Huiyu Mao & Fukang Zhu & Yan Cui, 2020. "A generalized mixture integer-valued GARCH model," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 29(3), pages 527-552, September.
    15. Ana Oliveira-Brochado & F. Vitorino Martins, 2006. "Examining the segment retention problem for the “Group Satellite” case," FEP Working Papers 220, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    16. Jian Guo & Elizaveta Levina & George Michailidis & Ji Zhu, 2010. "Pairwise Variable Selection for High-Dimensional Model-Based Clustering," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 793-804, September.
    17. Pennings, Joost M.E. & Garcia, Philip & Irwin, Scott H. & Good, Darrel L., 2003. "How To Group Market Participants? Heterogeneity In Hedging Behavior," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21963, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Lu Tang & Ling Zhou & Peter X. K. Song, 2019. "Fusion learning algorithm to combine partially heterogeneous Cox models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 395-414, March.
    19. Molly C. Klanderman & Kathryn B. Newhart & Tzahi Y. Cath & Amanda S. Hering, 2020. "Fault isolation for a complex decentralized waste water treatment facility," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 931-951, August.
    20. Tomáš Plíhal, 2021. "Scheduled macroeconomic news announcements and Forex volatility forecasting," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(8), pages 1379-1397, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:144:y:2020:i:c:s0167947319302385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.