IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v103y2016icp350-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing classical criteria for selecting intra-class correlated features in Multimix

Author

Listed:
  • Hunt, Lynette A.
  • Basford, Kaye E.

Abstract

The mixture approach to clustering requires the user to specify both the number of components to be fitted to the model and the form of the component distributions. In the Multimix class of models, the user also has to decide on the correlation structure to be introduced into the model. The behaviour of some commonly used model selection criteria is investigated when using the finite mixture model to cluster data containing mixed categorical and continuous attributes. The performance of these criteria in selecting both the number of components in the model and the form of the correlation structure amongst the attributes when fitting the Multimix class of models is illustrated using simulated data and a real medical data set. It is found that criteria based on the integrated classification likelihood have the best performance in detecting the number of clusters to be fitted to the model and in selecting the form of the component distributions. The performance of the Bayesian information criterion in detecting the correct model depends on the partitioning structure among the attributes while the Akaike information criterion and classification likelihood criterion perform in a less satisfactory way.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunt, Lynette A. & Basford, Kaye E., 2016. "Comparing classical criteria for selecting intra-class correlated features in Multimix," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 350-366.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:103:y:2016:i:c:p:350-366
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.05.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016794731630130X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2016.05.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilles Celeux & Gilda Soromenho, 1996. "An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 13(2), pages 195-212, September.
    2. Miloslavsky, Maja & van der Laan, Mark J., 2003. "Fitting of mixtures with unspecified number of components using cross validation distance estimate," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-4), pages 413-428, January.
    3. J. Hartigan, 1985. "Statistical theory in clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 63-76, December.
    4. Hathaway, Richard J., 1986. "Another interpretation of the EM algorithm for mixture distributions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 53-56, March.
    5. Raftery, Adrian E. & Dean, Nema, 2006. "Variable Selection for Model-Based Clustering," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 168-178, March.
    6. G. J. McLachlan, 1987. "On Bootstrapping the Likelihood Ratio Test Statistic for the Number of Components in a Normal Mixture," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 36(3), pages 318-324, November.
    7. Gilles Celeux & Gérard Govaert, 1991. "Clustering criteria for discrete data and latent class models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 8(2), pages 157-176, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scrucca, Luca, 2016. "Identifying connected components in Gaussian finite mixture models for clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 5-17.
    2. Paul D. McNicholas, 2016. "Model-Based Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 33(3), pages 331-373, October.
    3. Maciejowska, Katarzyna, 2013. "Assessing the number of components in a normal mixture: an alternative approach," MPRA Paper 50303, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Christophe Biernacki & Matthieu Marbac & Vincent Vandewalle, 2021. "Gaussian-Based Visualization of Gaussian and Non-Gaussian-Based Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 38(1), pages 129-157, April.
    5. Daniel Fernández & Richard Arnold & Shirley Pledger & Ivy Liu & Roy Costilla, 2019. "Finite mixture biclustering of discrete type multivariate data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(1), pages 117-143, March.
    6. Paul Koster & Hans Koster, 2013. "Commuters' Preferences for Fast and Reliable Travel," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-075/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 30 Apr 2015.
    7. S. Bacci & S. Pandolfi & F. Pennoni, 2014. "A comparison of some criteria for states selection in the latent Markov model for longitudinal data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(2), pages 125-145, June.
    8. Michael Salter-Townshend & Thomas Murphy, 2014. "Mixtures of biased sentiment analysers," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(1), pages 85-103, March.
    9. Miloslavsky, Maja & van der Laan, Mark J., 2003. "Fitting of mixtures with unspecified number of components using cross validation distance estimate," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-4), pages 413-428, January.
    10. Koster, Paul R. & Koster, Hans R.A., 2015. "Commuters’ preferences for fast and reliable travel: A semi-parametric estimation approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 289-301.
    11. Hennig, Christian, 2008. "Dissolution point and isolation robustness: Robustness criteria for general cluster analysis methods," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(6), pages 1154-1176, July.
    12. Nicolas Depraetere & Martina Vandebroek, 2014. "Order selection in finite mixtures of linear regressions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 871-911, August.
    13. Matthieu Marbac & Mohammed Sedki & Tienne Patin, 2020. "Variable Selection for Mixed Data Clustering: Application in Human Population Genomics," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 37(1), pages 124-142, April.
    14. Govaert, Gérard & Nadif, Mohamed, 2008. "Block clustering with Bernoulli mixture models: Comparison of different approaches," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 3233-3245, February.
    15. McLachlan, G. J. & Khan, N., 2004. "On a resampling approach for tests on the number of clusters with mixture model-based clustering of tissue samples," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 90-105, July.
    16. Julian Aichholzer & Sylvia Kritzinger & Carolina Plescia, 2021. "National identity profiles and support for the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(2), pages 293-315, June.
    17. Adrian Bruhin & Ernst Fehr & Daniel Schunk, 2019. "The many Faces of Human Sociality: Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1025-1069.
    18. Fetene B. Tekle & Dereje W. Gudicha & Jeroen K. Vermunt, 2016. "Power analysis for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test for the number of classes in latent class models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(2), pages 209-224, June.
    19. Jacky C. K. Ng & Joanne Y. H. Chong & Hilary K. Y. Ng, 2023. "The way I see the world, the way I envy others: a person-centered investigation of worldviews and the malicious and benign forms of envy among adolescents and adults," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Gillian C. Williams & Karen A. Patte & Mark A. Ferro & Scott T. Leatherdale, 2021. "Associations between Longitudinal Patterns of Substance Use and Anxiety and Depression Symptoms among a Sample of Canadian Secondary School Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:103:y:2016:i:c:p:350-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.