IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v139y2020ics0960077920304094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of scaling equipment on U-10 players tennis serve during match-play: A nonlinear pedagogical approach

Author

Listed:
  • Gimenez-Egido, José María
  • Ortega-Toro, Enrique
  • Palao, José M
  • Torres-Luque, Gema

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare two scaled competition formats for under 10 years of age (U-10) tennis players analyzing: serve performance; serve performance according to the serve placement; rally length; rally length in function of the serve placement; serve performance according to the game status.. Twenty U-10 players (age = 9.46±0.66 years) played eighty single tennis matches. Forty matches were played according to the International Tennis Federation's Tennis 10s guide for U-10 players in the stage green (GC) and the remaining half in a modified competition (MC) decreasing net height (from 0.91 m to 0.80 m) and court size (from 23.77-m x 8.23-m to 18.00-m x 8.23-m) with green ball (lower compression ball). The study variables were collected using the “Observational Instrument for the Technical-Tactical Actions in Singles Tennis”. Results showed an increase in first serve success, hitting more aces (mean difference, ±90% CL= 1.48, 0.62-2.34) and unreturned serves (±90% CL= 0.74, 0.27 to 1.28) in Mc than GC. However, the players in GC hitting more first serves inside the net (CL= -1.14, -1.63 to -0.65). Therefore, reducing net height and court-size improves the serve performance, thus creating a meaningful learning environment for U-10 tennis players.

Suggested Citation

  • Gimenez-Egido, José María & Ortega-Toro, Enrique & Palao, José M & Torres-Luque, Gema, 2020. "Effect of scaling equipment on U-10 players tennis serve during match-play: A nonlinear pedagogical approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:139:y:2020:i:c:s0960077920304094
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077920304094
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miriam Chang Yi Lee & Jia Yi Chow & John Komar & Clara Wee Keat Tan & Chris Button, 2014. "Nonlinear Pedagogy: An Effective Approach to Cater for Individual Differences in Learning a Sports Skill," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Hazuan Hizan & Peter Whipp & Machar Reid, 2011. "Comparison of serve and serve return statistics of high performance male and female tennis players from different age-groups," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 365-375, August.
    3. Gemma Robinson & Peter O’Donoghue, 2007. "A weighted kappa statistic for reliability testing in performance analysis of sport," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 12-19, January.
    4. Klaassen F. J G M & Magnus J. R., 2001. "Are Points in Tennis Independent and Identically Distributed? Evidence From a Dynamic Binary Panel Data Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 500-509, June.
    5. Stefan Schmidhofer & Roland Leser & Michael Ebert, 2014. "A comparison between the structure in elite tennis and kids tennis on scaled courts (Tennis 10s)," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 829-840, December.
    6. David Bayer & Michael Ebert & Roland Leser, 2017. "A comparison of the playing structure in elite kids tennis on two different scaled courts," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1-2), pages 34-43, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Holmes, Benjamin & McHale, Ian G. & Żychaluk, Kamila, 2023. "A Markov chain model for forecasting results of mixed martial arts contests," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 623-640.
    2. Christophe Ley & Yves Dominicy, 2017. "Mutual Point-winning Probabilities (MPW): a New Performance Measure for Table Tennis," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2017-23, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Klaassen, F.J.G.M. & Magnus, J.R., 2006. "Are Economic Agents Successful Optimizers? An Analysis Through Strategy in Tennis," Other publications TiSEM 73e12d86-8fe4-4a87-9181-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Thierry Lallemand & Robert Plasman & François Rycx, 2008. "Women and Competition in Elimination Tournaments," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 9(1), pages 3-19, February.
    5. Guy Elaad & Alex Krumer & Jeffrey Kantor, 2018. "Corruption and Sensitive Soccer Games: Cross-Country Evidence," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 364-394.
    6. Romain Gauriot & Lionel Page & John Wooders, 2016. "Nash at Wimbledon: Evidence from Half a Million Serves," QuBE Working Papers 046, QUT Business School.
    7. Legge, Stefan & Schmid, Lukas, 2013. "Rankings, Random Successes, and Individual Performance," Economics Working Paper Series 1340, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    8. Picchio, Matteo & van Ours, Jan C., 2024. "The impact of high temperatures on performance in work-related activities," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    9. Gery Geenens & Thomas Cuddihy, 2018. "Non‐parametric evidence of second‐leg home advantage in European football," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 1009-1031, October.
    10. Krumer, Alex & Lechner, Michael, 2016. "First In First Win: Evidence on Unfairness of Round-Robin Tournaments in Mega-Events," Economics Working Paper Series 1611, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    11. Sunde, Uwe, 2003. "Potential, Prizes and Performance: Testing Tournament Theory with Professional Tennis Data," IZA Discussion Papers 947, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Noubary Reza D. & Coles Drue, 2011. "Rule of Tangent for Win-By-Two Games," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Romain Gauriot & Lionel Page & John Wooders, 2016. "Nash at Wimbledon: Evidence from Half a Million Serves," QuBE Working Papers 046, QUT Business School.
    14. Klaassen, Franc J. G. M. & Magnus, Jan R., 2003. "Forecasting the winner of a tennis match," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 257-267, July.
    15. Paul Williams & Andrew Heathcote & Keith Nesbitt & Ami Eidels, 2016. "Post-error recklessness and the hot hand," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(2), pages 174-184, March.
    16. Iqbal, Hamzah & Krumer, Alex, 2017. "Discouragement Effect and Intermediate Prizes in Multi-Stage Contests: Evidence from Tennis’s Davis Cup," Economics Working Paper Series 1719, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    17. Robert M. Lantis & Erik T. Nesson, 2019. "Hot Shots: An Analysis of the ‘Hot Hand’ in NBA Field Goal and Free Throw Shooting," NBER Working Papers 26510, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Iván Prieto-Lage & Adrián Paramés-González & Juan Carlos Argibay-González & Xoana Reguera-López-de-la-Osa & Santiago Ordóñez-Álvarez & Alfonso Gutiérrez-Santiago, 2022. "Match Analysis in Women’s Tennis on Clay, Grass and Hard Courts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Jesús Ramón-Llin & José Guzmán & Rafael Martínez-Gallego & Goran Vučković & Diego Muñoz & Bernardino J Sánchez-Alcaraz, 2021. "Comparison of service tactic formation on players’ movements and point outcome between national and beginner level padel," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, October.
    20. Adrián Escudero-Tena & Bernardino Javier Sánchez-Alcaraz & Javier García-Rubio & Sergio J. Ibáñez, 2021. "Analysis of Game Performance Indicators during 2015–2019 World Padel Tour Seasons and Their Influence on Match Outcome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-8, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:139:y:2020:i:c:s0960077920304094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.