IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v51y2019i2p170-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors impacting accounting research output in developing countries: An exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Negash, Minga
  • Lemma, Tesfaye T.
  • Samkin, Grant

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to identify the factors that impact accounting research output in one of the developing regions of the world, Anglophone Sub-Sahara Africa (Anglophone SSA). Adopting an institutional theory framework, the paper uses a sequential research process comprising an original questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Four research questions were developed to achieve the research objectives. The region's low research output is explained by a host of individual, departmental and/or university, country and international factors; of these, departmental and/or university factors appear to have the strongest impact. The study also found that factors that constitute the regulative (coercive) pillar that promote research tend to be weaker in this region's universities, while factors that constitute the normative and cultural-cognitive pillars which tend to promote teaching appear to be stronger. Thus, the institutional pressure stemming from factors that constitute normative and cultural-cognitive elements dictate the conduct of an accounting academic positioned in Anglophone SSA's universities. That is, research activities of accounting academics in the region are disempowered by the more potent, normative and cultural-cognitive pressures and are inadequately sanctioned by the regulative pressure.

Suggested Citation

  • Negash, Minga & Lemma, Tesfaye T. & Samkin, Grant, 2019. "Factors impacting accounting research output in developing countries: An exploratory study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 170-192.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:51:y:2019:i:2:p:170-192
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2018.09.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838918300659
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2018.09.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. J. Fogarty & Susan Ravenscroft, 1999. "The importance of being 'wordy': willingness to write and publication productivity among accounting academics," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 187-202.
    2. Tucker, Basil P. & Parker, Lee D. & Merchant, Kenneth A., 2016. "With a little help from our friends: An empirical investigation of co-authoring in accounting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 185-205.
    3. Prather-Kinsey, Jenice & Rueschhoff, Norlin, 1999. "An analysis of the authorship of international accounting research in U.S. journals and AOS: 1980 through 1996," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 261-282, June.
    4. Rachel Ngai & Roberto Samaniego, 2011. "Accounting for Research and Productivity Growth Across Industries," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 14(3), pages 475-495, July.
    5. Audrey Milton & Brendan O'Connell, 2009. "Commodification of higher education in accounting: a Marxist perspective," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 204-227.
    6. Charles S. White & Karen James & Lisa A. Burke & Richard S. Allen, 2012. "What makes a “research star”? Factors influencing the research productivity of business faculty," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 584-602, July.
    7. Andrew Gelman & Thomas Basbøll, 2014. "When Do Stories Work? Evidence and Illustration in the Social Sciences," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 43(4), pages 547-570, November.
    8. Lounsbury, Michael, 2008. "Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(4-5), pages 349-361.
    9. Grietjie Verhoef & Grant Samkin, 2017. "The accounting profession and education," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(6), pages 1370-1398, August.
    10. Vivien Beattie & Alan Goodacre, 2012. "Publication records of accounting and finance faculty promoted to professor: evidence from the UK," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 197-231, June.
    11. Rahaman, Abu Shiraz, 2010. "Critical accounting research in Africa: Whence and whither," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 420-427.
    12. Andrews, Matthew R., 2009. "Isomorphism and the Limits to African Public Financial Management Reform," Scholarly Articles 4415942, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    13. Lowe, Alan & Locke, Joanne, 2005. "Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 81-98, January.
    14. Soledad Moya & Diego Prior & Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pérez, 2014. "Research Patterns in the Spanish Accounting Academia," Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 9, in: Adela García Aracil & Isabel Neira Gómez (ed.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 9, edition 1, volume 9, chapter 30, pages 567-583, Asociación de Economía de la Educación.
    15. Eva Boxenbaum & Stefan Jonsson, 2017. "Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges," Post-Print hal-01488051, HAL.
    16. Kwabena Gyimah-Brempong & Oliver Paddison & Workie Mitiku, 2006. "Higher education and economic growth in Africa," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 509-529.
    17. Kam C. Chan & Chih‐Hsiang Chang & Jamie Y. Tong & Feida Zhang, 2012. "An analysis of the accounting and finance research productivity in Australia and New Zealand in 1991–2010," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(1), pages 249-265, March.
    18. Rebecca Long & Aleta Crawford & Michael White & Kimberly Davis, 2009. "Determinants of faculty research productivity in information systems: An empirical analysis of the impact of academic origin and academic affiliation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 231-260, February.
    19. James Guthrie & Lee D. Parker, 2014. "The global accounting academic: what counts!," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(1), pages 2-14, January.
    20. Garry D. Bruton & David Ahlstrom & Han–Lin Li, 2010. "Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Need to Move in the Future?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(3), pages 421-440, May.
    21. Minga Negash, 2011. "Resource allocation challenges in South African universities: a management accounting perspective," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2/3), pages 265-292.
    22. Perkmann, Markus & Walsh, Kathryn, 2008. "Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1884-1891, December.
    23. Elmar Retief Venter & Charl de Villiers, 2013. "The accounting profession's influence on academe: South African evidence," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(8), pages 1246-1278, October.
    24. Andrews, Matt, 2009. "Isomorphism and the Limits to African Public Financial Management Reform," Working Paper Series rwp09-012, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    25. Paul De Lange & Brendan O’Connell & M.R. Mathews & Alan Sangster, 2010. "The ERA: A Brave New World of Accountability for Australian University Accounting Schools," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(1), pages 24-37, March.
    26. Zhang, Guohua & Boyce, Gordon & Ahmed, Kamran, 2014. "Institutional changes in university accounting education in post-revolutionary China: From political orientation to internationalization," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 819-843.
    27. Robert Ochoki Nyamori & Abu Shiraz Abdul-Rahaman & Grant Samkin, 2017. "Accounting, auditing and accountability research in Africa," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(6), pages 1206-1229, August.
    28. Paul M. Romer, 1994. "The Origins of Endogenous Growth," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 3-22, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudiu Vasile Kifor & Ana Maria Benedek & Ioan Sîrbu & Roxana Florența Săvescu, 2023. "Institutional drivers of research productivity: a canonical multivariate analysis of Romanian public universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2233-2258, April.
    2. Minga Negash & Tesfaye T. Lemma, 2020. "Institutional pressures and the accounting and reporting of environmental liabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1941-1960, July.
    3. Heng, Kimkong & Hamid, M. Obaidul & Khan, Asaduzzaman, 2022. "Academics’ conceptions of research and the research-teaching nexus: Insights from Cambodia," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Shuttleworth, Christina Cornelia & Williamson, Charmaine, 2022. "A research advisory model guiding higher degree accounting students and supervisors to become part of a community of scholars," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minga Negash & Tesfaye T. Lemma, 2020. "Institutional pressures and the accounting and reporting of environmental liabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1941-1960, July.
    2. Tucker, Basil P. & Tilt, Carol A., 2019. "‘You know it when you see it’: In search of ‘the ideal’ research culture in university accounting faculties," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Alan Goodacre & Clive Gaunt & Darren Henry, 2021. "Publication records of Australian accounting and finance faculty promoted to full professor, set within an international context," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 3089-3133, June.
    4. Golyagina, Alena, 2020. "Competing logics in university accounting education in post-revolutionary Russia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Wilkinson, Brett R. & Durden, Chris H., 2015. "Inducing structural change in academic accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 23-36.
    6. Matt Andrews, 2013. "Do International Organizations Really Shape Government Solutions in Developing Countries?," CID Working Papers 264, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    7. Troisi, Roberta, 2022. "Illegal land use by Italian firms: An empirical analysis through the lens of isomorphism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    8. Bernard Raffournier & Alain Schatt, 2010. "Is European Accounting Research Fairly Reflected in Academic Journals? An Investigation of Possible Non-mainstream and Language Barrier Biases," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 161-190.
    9. Peter Boulding & Andrew Mackie & Frans Ronsholt & Stephen Sharples, 2012. "New development: PEFA—what difference has it made?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 41-44, January.
    10. Andrews, Matt, 2013. "How Do Governments Get Great?," Working Paper Series rwp13-020, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    11. Lodewijk Smets & Stephen Knack, 2018. "World Bank Policy Lending and the Quality of Public-Sector Governance," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(1), pages 29-54.
    12. Voxi Heinrich Amavilah & Antonio Rodríguez Andrés, 2024. "Knowledge Economy and the Economic Performance of African Countries: A Seemingly Unrelated and Recursive Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 110-143, March.
    13. Andrews, Matt, 2013. "How Do Governments Become Great? Ten Cases, Two Competing Explanations, One Large Research Agenda," WIDER Working Paper Series 091, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Dixon, Keith, 2013. "Growth and dispersion of accounting research about New Zealand before and during a National Research Assessment Exercise: Five decades of academic journals bibliometrics," MPRA Paper 51100, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Jurgen Blum & Nick Manning & Vivek Srivastava, 2012. "Public Sector Management Reform : Toward a Problem-Solving Approach," World Bank Publications - Reports 17057, The World Bank Group.
    16. Monir Zaman Mir & Abu Shiraz Rahaman, 2011. "In pursuit of environmental excellence," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(7), pages 848-878, September.
    17. Lant Pritchett & Masoomeh Khandan, 2017. "Autonomous Reform vs Global Isomorphism: Explaining Iran’s Success in Reducing Fertility," CID Working Papers 338, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    18. Gebreiter, Florian, 2022. "A profession in peril? University corporatization, performance measurement and the sustainability of accounting academia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Nick Manning & Joanna Watkins, 2013. "Targeting Results, Diagnosing the Means," World Bank Publications - Reports 25488, The World Bank Group.
    20. Wai Ching Poon & Gareth D. Leeves, 2017. "Is there gender gap unequivocally? Evidence from research output 1958–2008," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1687-1701, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:51:y:2019:i:2:p:170-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.