IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/asieco/v94y2024ics1049007824000836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social security fee reduction, industrial robots, and labor income share

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jianqiang
  • Hu, Ailian
  • Chen, Wanyi
  • Fang, Shiyao

Abstract

This study explores whether the policy of reducing labor payments can have opposite effects to those expected. Specifically, it investigates whether reducing the social insurance contribution rate can increase labor employment and enhance overall labor income. This study focuses on a direct social security fee reduction event in China. This event targets labor-intensive enterprises and encourages adopting industrial robots. By leveraging this quasi-natural experiment, we construct a mathematical model. Further, using a triple-difference strategy, we examine the impact of social security fee reduction on firm factor structures and income distribution. This study observes that a social security fee reduction decreases the labor income share of enterprises. However, this only applies to non-small and medium-sized enterprises (non-SMEs) and is not observed in SMEs. Consequently, because of the social security fee reduction, automation is the primary cause of the decline in the labor income share. The reduction in social security fees enables companies to use the saved funds for further automation, causing labor productivity to exceed labor costs and ultimately reducing the labor income share. The findings suggest that industrial specialization is one of the reasons for labor income share decline in transitioning economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jianqiang & Hu, Ailian & Chen, Wanyi & Fang, Shiyao, 2024. "Social security fee reduction, industrial robots, and labor income share," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:asieco:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s1049007824000836
    DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049007824000836
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:asieco:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s1049007824000836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/asieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.