IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v98y2012icp533-539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Procurement of interruptible load services in electricity supply systems

Author

Listed:
  • Toh, G.K.
  • Gooi, H.B.

Abstract

This paper presents the effect of implementing interruptible loads (ILs) from the demand side for reserve allocation in an electricity supply system. A unit commitment (UC) objective function is used to incorporate the energy/reserve providers and to schedule energy and reserves simultaneously. An innate IL reliability modelling methodology is explicitly presented. A thermal unit system with demand-side participation is traversed by varying the size of the ILs, the reserve offer prices, and the value of lost load (VOLL). A penalty cost is imposed on IL service providers whose loads are supposed to be interrupted when initiated but fail to respond and grid service providers who are responsible for the maintenance of under-frequency relays (UFRs) and circuit-breakers (CBs) connected to ILs. The objective of this penalty cost proposal is to achieve a better and healthier energy supply system. The results in this paper provide useful insight into how the Demand Side Management and penalty scheme is capable of maintaining and/or improving the operation of the electricity supply system.

Suggested Citation

  • Toh, G.K. & Gooi, H.B., 2012. "Procurement of interruptible load services in electricity supply systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 533-539.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:98:y:2012:i:c:p:533-539
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261912003108
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Behrangrad, Mahdi & Sugihara, Hideharu & Funaki, Tsuyoshi, 2011. "Effect of optimal spinning reserve requirement on system pollution emission considering reserve supplying demand response in the electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2548-2558, July.
    2. Kwag, Hyung-Geun & Kim, Jin-O, 2012. "Optimal combined scheduling of generation and demand response with demand resource constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 161-170.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao, Jucheng & He, Guangyu & Fan, Shuai & Zhang, Siyuan & Wu, Qing & Li, Zuyi, 2020. "Decentralized transfer of contingency reserve: Framework and methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    2. Ussama Assad & Muhammad Arshad Shehzad Hassan & Umar Farooq & Asif Kabir & Muhammad Zeeshan Khan & S. Sabahat H. Bukhari & Zain ul Abidin Jaffri & Judit Oláh & József Popp, 2022. "Smart Grid, Demand Response and Optimization: A Critical Review of Computational Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-36, March.
    3. Hussein Jumma Jabir & Jiashen Teh & Dahaman Ishak & Hamza Abunima, 2018. "Impacts of Demand-Side Management on Electrical Power Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vardakas, John S. & Zorba, Nizar & Verikoukis, Christos V., 2015. "Performance evaluation of power demand scheduling scenarios in a smart grid environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 164-178.
    2. Reihani, Ehsan & Motalleb, Mahdi & Thornton, Matsu & Ghorbani, Reza, 2016. "A novel approach using flexible scheduling and aggregation to optimize demand response in the developing interactive grid market architecture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 445-455.
    3. Kwag, Hyung-Geun & Kim, Jin-O, 2014. "Reliability modeling of demand response considering uncertainty of customer behavior," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 24-33.
    4. Roos, Aleksandra & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland, 2018. "Value of demand flexibility on spot and reserve electricity markets in future power system with increased shares of variable renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 207-217.
    5. Boßmann, Tobias & Eser, Eike Johannes, 2016. "Model-based assessment of demand-response measures—A comprehensive literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1637-1656.
    6. Heydarian-Forushani, E. & Golshan, M.E.H. & Shafie-khah, M., 2015. "Flexible security-constrained scheduling of wind power enabling time of use pricing scheme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1887-1900.
    7. Kirchem, Dana & Lynch, Muireann Á. & Bertsch, Valentin & Casey, Eoin, 2020. "Modelling demand response with process models and energy systems models: Potential applications for wastewater treatment within the energy-water nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    8. Wang, D. & Parkinson, S. & Miao, W. & Jia, H. & Crawford, C. & Djilali, N., 2013. "Hierarchical market integration of responsive loads as spinning reserve," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 229-238.
    9. Neda Hajibandeh & Miadreza Shafie-khah & Sobhan Badakhshan & Jamshid Aghaei & Sílvio J. P. S. Mariano & João P. S. Catalão, 2019. "Multi-Objective Market Clearing Model with an Autonomous Demand Response Scheme," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Aghaei, Jamshid & Alizadeh, Mohammad-Iman, 2013. "Demand response in smart electricity grids equipped with renewable energy sources: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 64-72.
    11. K. Selvakumar & K. Vijayakumar & C. S. Boopathi, 2017. "Demand Response Unit Commitment Problem Solution for Maximizing Generating Companies’ Profit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Arasteh, Hamidreza & Sepasian, Mohammad Sadegh & Vahidinasab, Vahid, 2016. "An aggregated model for coordinated planning and reconfiguration of electric distribution networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 786-798.
    13. Edwin Garcia & Alexander Águila & Leony Ortiz & Milton Ruiz, 2024. "Optimum Stochastic Allocation for Demand Response for Power Markets in Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Eissa, M.M., 2019. "Developing incentive demand response with commercial energy management system (CEMS) based on diffusion model, smart meters and new communication protocol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 273-292.
    15. Liu, Fan & Bie, Zhaohong & Liu, Shiyu & Ding, Tao, 2017. "Day-ahead optimal dispatch for wind integrated power system considering zonal reserve requirements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 399-408.
    16. Behrangrad, Mahdi, 2015. "A review of demand side management business models in the electricity market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 270-283.
    17. M.‐Elisabeth Paté‐Cornell & Marshall Kuypers & Matthew Smith & Philip Keller, 2018. "Cyber Risk Management for Critical Infrastructure: A Risk Analysis Model and Three Case Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 226-241, February.
    18. Motalleb, Mahdi & Thornton, Matsu & Reihani, Ehsan & Ghorbani, Reza, 2016. "A nascent market for contingency reserve services using demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 985-995.
    19. Yebai Qi & Dan Wang & Yu Lan & Hongjie Jia & Chengshan Wang & Kaixin Liu & Qing’e Hu & Menghua Fan, 2017. "A Two-Level Optimal Scheduling Strategy for Central Air-Conditioners Based on Metal Model with Comprehensive State-Queueing Control Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Kirchem, Dana & Lynch, Muireann Á & Casey, Eoin & Bertsch, Valentin, 2019. "Demand response within the energy-for-water-nexus: A review," Papers WP637, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:98:y:2012:i:c:p:533-539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.