IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v377y2025ipds0306261924020701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative options for biogas-to-energy: A comparison of electricity and biomethane generation based on the real operation of a production site

Author

Listed:
  • Negro, Viviana
  • Noussan, Michel
  • Chiaramonti, David

Abstract

The production of biogas for energy generation through the anaerobic digestion is seen as an effective way to exploit local renewable resources as a substitute of fossil fuels. The two main applications that are currently adopted are the electricity production through biogas internal combustion engines, potentially combined with heat recovery, and the biogas upgrading to biomethane, to be supplied to the natural gas infrastructure. This research work contributes to the discussion by analyzing the performance of a real biogas plant in Italy, based on the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste, that has shifted from power generation to biomethane generation. The performance of the two configurations is compared by means of the expected CO2 emissions savings against the current average electricity in Italy and natural gas carbon intensities, including upstream emissions. The results show that, based on the assumptions of our analysis for the current context of Italy, 1 MWh of biogas from organic fraction of municipal solid waste can lead to 152 kgCO2,eq savings if upgraded to biomethane and injected into the grid, but only to 120 kgCO2,eq when used in engines running in full-electric mode. If the engines are also producing useful heat, emission savings increase, reaching a trade-off with biomethane if 31% of the annual heat production can be recovered. However, considering the expected 2030 electricity mix in Italy, biomethane production would still be the best solution to maximize emission savings. Performance data from real plants are an important resource to develop reliable and effective energy system models, that can support policy makers in defining local energy plans and decarbonization strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Negro, Viviana & Noussan, Michel & Chiaramonti, David, 2025. "Alternative options for biogas-to-energy: A comparison of electricity and biomethane generation based on the real operation of a production site," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PD).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pd:s0306261924020701
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924020701
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noussan, Michel & Negro, Viviana & Prussi, Matteo & Chiaramonti, David, 2024. "The potential role of biomethane for the decarbonization of transport: An analysis of 2030 scenarios in Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    2. Ardolino, F. & Cardamone, G.F. & Parrillo, F. & Arena, U., 2021. "Biogas-to-biomethane upgrading: A comparative review and assessment in a life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Silva, J. & Gonçalves, J.C. & Rocha, C. & Vilaça, J. & Madeira, L.M., 2024. "Biomethane production from biogas obtained in wastewater treatment plants: Process optimization and economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Eggemann, Lea & Rau, Florian & Stolten, Detlef, 2023. "The ecological potential of manure utilisation in small-scale biogas plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    5. Horschig, Thomas & Adams, Paul W.R. & Röder, Mirjam & Thornley, Patricia & Thrän, Daniela, 2016. "Reasonable potential for GHG savings by anaerobic biomethane in Germany and UK derived from economic and ecological analyses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 840-852.
    6. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    7. Keogh, N. & Corr, D. & Monaghan, R.F.D., 2024. "An environmental and economic assessment for biomethane injection and natural gas heavy goods vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    8. Yin, Yongjun & Chen, Shaoxu & Li, Xusheng & Jiang, Bo & Zhao, Joe RuHe & Nong, Guangzai, 2021. "Comparative analysis of different CHP systems using biogas for the cassava starch plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    9. Keogh, Niamh & Corr, D. & O'Shea, R. & Monaghan, R.F.D., 2022. "The gas grid as a vector for regional decarbonisation - a techno economic case study for biomethane injection and natural gas heavy goods vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    10. Fernandes, Daniel J. & Ferreira, Ana F. & Fernandes, Edgar C., 2023. "Biogas and biomethane production potential via anaerobic digestion of manure: A case study of Portugal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Prina, Matteo Giacomo & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Moser, David & Nastasi, Benedetto & Sparber, Wolfram, 2020. "Classification and challenges of bottom-up energy system models - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taramasso, Maria Adele & Motaghi, Milad & Casasso, Alessandro, 2024. "A techno-economic feasibility analysis of solutions to cover the thermal and electrical demands of anaerobic digesters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Mehta, Neha & Anderson, Aine & Johnston, Christopher R. & Rooney, David W., 2022. "Evaluating the opportunity for utilising anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis of livestock manure and grass silage to decarbonise gas infrastructure: A Northern Ireland case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 343-357.
    3. Wantz, Eliot & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2022. "Rate-based modeling approach for High Pressure Water Scrubbing with unsteady gas flowrate and multicomponent absorption applied to biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    4. Wang, Shuaibing & Lin, Haitao & Abed, Azher M. & Mahariq, Ibrahim & Ayed, Hamdi & Mouldi, Abir & Lin, Zhixiang, 2024. "Life cycle analysis of biowaste-to- biogas/biomethane processes: Cost and environmental assessment of four different biowaste scenarios organic fraction of municipal solid waste and secondary sewage s," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    5. Huopana, Tuomas & Song, Han & Kolehmainen, Mikko & Niska, Harri, 2013. "A regional model for sustainable biogas electricity production: A case study from a Finnish province," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 676-686.
    6. Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon & Solomon, A.A. & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Aghahosseini, Arman & Mensah, Theophilus Nii Odai & Ram, Manish & Breyer, Christian, 2021. "Just transition towards defossilised energy systems for developing economies: A case study of Ethiopia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 346-365.
    7. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Marcin Dębowski & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Anna Nowicka & Magda Dudek & Marcin Zieliński, 2024. "The Use of Hydrodynamic Cavitation to Improve the Anaerobic Digestion of Waste from Dairy Cattle Farming—From Laboratory Tests to Large-Scale Agricultural Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    9. Scholz, Marco & Melin, Thomas & Wessling, Matthias, 2013. "Transforming biogas into biomethane using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 199-212.
    10. Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Fehler, Alexander & Gaumnitz, Felix & van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Bußa, 2022. "Modeling flexibility in energy systems — comparison of power sector models based on simplified test cases," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Grzegorz Ślusarz & Barbara Gołębiewska & Marek Cierpiał-Wolan & Jarosław Gołębiewski & Dariusz Twaróg & Sebastian Wójcik, 2021. "Regional Diversification of Potential, Production and Efficiency of Use of Biogas and Biomass in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Zhang, Chen & Sun, Zongxuan, 2017. "Trajectory-based combustion control for renewable fuels in free piston engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 72-83.
    13. Thompson, T.M. & Young, B.R. & Baroutian, S., 2020. "Pelagic Sargassum for energy and fertiliser production in the Caribbean: A case study on Barbados," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    14. Johannes Full & Silja Hohmann & Sonja Ziehn & Edgar Gamero & Tobias Schließ & Hans-Peter Schmid & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2023. "Perspectives of Biogas Plants as BECCS Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Biomethane vs. Biohydrogen Production with Carbon Capture and Storage or Use (CCS/CCU)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Yan Bai & Xingyi Ma & Jing Zhang & Lei Zhang & Jing Bai, 2024. "Energy Efficiency Assessment and Prediction Based on Indicator System, PSO + AHP − FCE Model and Regression Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Zeb, Iftikhar & Ma, Jingwei & Frear, Craig & Zhao, Quanbao & Ndegwa, Pius & Yao, Yiqing & Kafle, Gopi Krishna, 2017. "Recycling separated liquid-effluent to dilute feedstock in anaerobic digestion of dairy manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1144-1151.
    17. Theresa Liegl & Simon Schramm & Philipp Kuhn & Thomas Hamacher, 2023. "Considering Socio-Technical Parameters in Energy System Models—The Current Status and Next Steps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Anna Lymperatou & Niels B. Rasmussen & Hariklia N. Gavala & Ioannis V. Skiadas, 2021. "Improving the Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure through an Optimized Ammonia Treatment: Process Performance, Digestate and Techno-Economic Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Li, Heng & Chen, Zheng & Fu, Dun & Wang, Yuanpeng & Zheng, Yanmei & Li, Qingbiao, 2020. "Improved ADM1 for modelling C, N, P fates in anaerobic digestion process of pig manure and optimization approaches to biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2330-2336.
    20. Silinto, Berino Francisco & van der Laag Yamu, Claudia & Zuidema, Christian & Faaij, André P.C., 2025. "Hybrid renewable energy systems for rural electrification in developing countries: A review on energy system models and spatial explicit modelling tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pd:s0306261924020701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.