IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v377y2025ipas0306261924017690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A safe region method to quantitatively evaluate the safety of fuel cell operating states

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jianwei
  • Wang, Tianci
  • Yang, Qingqing
  • Tian, Zhonghao
  • Lv, Hong
  • Wang, Xuechao
  • Shen, Jun

Abstract

The operation of fuel cell (FC) necessitates ensuring safety across various aspects. The high coupling of state parameters poses challenges in pinpointing potential risks implicit in the state, rendering failures difficult to prevent. Existing FC failure analysis methods could qualitatively overview the evolution of failures or establish parameter thresholds, but fall short in safety assessment of the operating state. In this paper, a novel safety region method is developed. This method considers both safety and operational constraints concerning output voltage, air pressure, water transfer, and heat dissipation, translating these constraints into boundary surfaces. In the safety region, the safety distance serves as an indicator to characterize risk tolerance level, quantifying the safety of operating states and forming a series of safety contour maps. Finally, the power contours are depicted on the safety contour map, the optimal direction and goal are proposed to improve safety during FC operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jianwei & Wang, Tianci & Yang, Qingqing & Tian, Zhonghao & Lv, Hong & Wang, Xuechao & Shen, Jun, 2025. "A safe region method to quantitatively evaluate the safety of fuel cell operating states," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261924017690
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924017690
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124386?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261924017690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.