IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v370y2024ics0306261924009358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electric vehicle charging stations' installing strategies: Considering government subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Jian
  • Yao, Yifan
  • Liu, Zhenfeng
  • Liu, Zhenling

Abstract

To address the “chicken-and-egg” dilemma in the electric vehicle (EV) market, the government intervenes by offering EV purchase subsidy to consumers and charging station construction subsidy to installers. Different from previous studies, this study investigates the effects of different types of government subsidies, including only consumer subsidies, only station subsidies, and a combination of above both subsidies, on EV demand and the charging station construction scale. In addition, we model a Stackelberg game between the government and two installers (an EV manufacturer and a charging platform). This study also differs from previous works by considering two installers instead of only one. Results indicate that the station subsidy is more conducive to EV demand than the consumer subsidy in the case of insufficient charging stations. Although the combination of both subsidies demonstrates the most significant effect on the charging station construction scale among all subsidy structures, it does not lead to an optimal ratio of EVs to charging stations (E2C ratio). Whereas only the station subsidy makes E2C ratio reach the lowest. Notably, both installers benefit more from the consumer subsidy when charging stations achieve the scale effect (β ≥ 0.6), while they gain more profit from the station subsidy when charging stations are insufficient (0 < β < 0.6). Moreover, we examine the effects of equal and different amount of station subsidies given to both installers. Interestingly, providing different amounts of station subsidies to two installers results in higher EV demand and a larger scale of charging station construction than those offering equal subsidies to both. Our outcomes also show that, compared with subsidizing the manufacturer to install charging stations, more station subsidy given to the platform can arouse its greater social responsibility and increase EV demand and the charging station scale. This study not only guides enterprise managers in decisions related to charging station installation but also offers nuanced policy recommendations for the government regarding subsidy structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Jian & Yao, Yifan & Liu, Zhenfeng & Liu, Zhenling, 2024. "Electric vehicle charging stations' installing strategies: Considering government subsidies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:370:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924009358
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924009358
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pabba Ramesh & Pongiannan Rakkiya Goundar Komarasamy & Narayanamoorthi Rajamanickam & Yahya Z. Alharthi & Ali Elrashidi & Waleed Nureldeen, 2024. "A Comprehensive Review on Control Technique and Socio-Economic Analysis for Sustainable Dynamic Wireless Charging Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-42, July.
    2. Narayanamoorthi Rajamanickam & Yuvaraja Shanmugam & Rahulkumar Jayaraman & Jan Petrov & Lukas Vavra & Radomir Gono, 2024. "Review of Compensation Topologies Power Converters Coil Structure and Architectures for Dynamic Wireless Charging System for Electric Vehicle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-43, August.
    3. Jia Ke & Dezhao Zhu & Yanjun Wang & Chunxiao Hao & Yan Ding, 2024. "Study on the Development Status and Promotion Strategy of Zero-Emission Commercial Vehicles in China under the Background of the Dual Carbon Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:370:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924009358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.