IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v17y2015i1p101-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward Mass Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Impact of the Range and Resale Anxieties

Author

Listed:
  • Michael K. Lim

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820)

  • Ho-Yin Mak

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Logistics Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Ying Rong

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China)

Abstract

Key to the mass adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) is the establishment of successful business models based on sound understanding of consumer behavior in adopting this new technology. In this paper, we study the impact of two major barriers to mass adoption of EVs: (i) range anxiety, the concern that the driving range of EVs may be insufficient to meet the driving needs, and (ii) resale anxiety, the concern that used values of EVs may deteriorate quickly. Using a stylized model calibrated to a data set based on the San Francisco Bay Area, we show that although both types of consumer anxieties typically harm the firm’s profit, they often improve consumer surplus. In addition, we show that a business model that requires consumers to lease the EV batteries (rather than purchase them) may lead to a greater level of adoption and emission savings when the level of resale anxiety is high. Further, a business model that offers EV range improvement through enhanced charging infrastructure typically yields greater adoption and consumer surplus, but lowers the firm’s profit, compared with one that offers enlarged batteries. Overall, we find that the combinations of battery owning/leasing with enhanced charging service, referred to as the (O, E) and (L, E) models in our paper, typically yield the best balance among the objectives of EV adoption, emission savings, profitability, and consumer surplus, when the degree of resale anxiety is low and high, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael K. Lim & Ho-Yin Mak & Ying Rong, 2015. "Toward Mass Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Impact of the Range and Resale Anxieties," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 101-119, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:17:y:2015:i:1:p:101-119
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2014.0504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2014.0504
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2014.0504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. , & ,, 2008. "Consumer optimism and price discrimination," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 3(4), December.
    2. Ho-Yin Mak & Ying Rong & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2013. "Infrastructure Planning for Electric Vehicles with Battery Swapping," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(7), pages 1557-1575, July.
    3. Sreekumar R. Bhaskaran & Stephen M. Gilbert, 2005. "Selling and Leasing Strategies for Durable Goods with Complementary Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1278-1290, August.
    4. de la Rosa, Leonidas Enrique, 2011. "Overconfidence and moral hazard," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 429-451.
    5. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    6. Erica Plambeck & Qiong Wang, 2009. "Effects of E-Waste Regulation on New Product Introduction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 333-347, March.
    7. Laurens G. Debo & L. Beril Toktay & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2005. "Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1193-1205, August.
    8. Michael D. Grubb, 2009. "Selling to Overconfident Consumers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1770-1807, December.
    9. Gérard P. Cachon, 2014. "Retail Store Density and the Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(8), pages 1907-1925, August.
    10. Franke, Thomas & Krems, Josef F., 2013. "Interacting with limited mobility resources: Psychological range levels in electric vehicle use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 109-122.
    11. Anja Sautmann, 2013. "Contracts for Agents with Biased Beliefs: Some Theory and an Experiment," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(3), pages 124-156, August.
    12. Vishal V. Agrawal & Mark Ferguson & L. Beril Toktay & Valerie M. Thomas, 2012. "Is Leasing Greener Than Selling?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 523-533, March.
    13. Alvaro Sandroni & Francesco Squintani, 2007. "Overconfidence, Insurance, and Paternalism," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1994-2004, December.
    14. Nektarios Oraiopoulos & Mark E. Ferguson & L. Beril Toktay, 2012. "Relicensing as a Secondary Market Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1022-1037, May.
    15. Stefano DellaVigna & Ulrike Malmendier, 2006. "Paying Not to Go to the Gym," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(3), pages 694-719, June.
    16. Preyas Desai & Devavrat Purohit, 1998. "Leasing and Selling: Optimal Marketing Strategies for a Durable Goods Firm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-2), pages 19-34, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen Jin & Luyi Yang & Cungen Zhu, 2023. "Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 1017-1036, February.
    2. Işıl & Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu, 2020. "Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 364-382, March.
    3. Fang, Hanming & Wu, Zenan, 2020. "Life insurance and life settlement markets with overconfident policyholders," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Vishal Agrawal & Atalay Atasu & Sezer Ülkü, 2021. "Leasing, Modularity, and the Circular Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6782-6802, November.
    5. Downs, Justin, 2024. "Screening, overconfidence, and competition’s effect on market efficiency," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    6. Justin Downs, 2021. "Information gathering by overconfident agents," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 554-568, August.
    7. Tianqin Shi & Dilip Chhajed & Zhixi Wan & Yunchuan Liu, 2020. "Distribution Channel Choice and Divisional Conflict in Remanufacturing Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1702-1719, July.
    8. Michael Grubb, 2015. "Behavioral Consumers in Industrial Organization: An Overview," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(3), pages 247-258, November.
    9. Chowdhury, Sayan & Verma, Nishant K., 2024. "Walking a tightrope: Impact of adopting voluntary right-to-repair policy on firm profit and consumer welfare," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    10. Jiang, Zhong-Zhong & Feng, Guangqi & Yi, Zelong, 2021. "How should a capital-constrained servicizing manufacturer search for financing? The impact of supply chain leadership," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Lingfei Cai & Xuan Shi & Jingrong Zhu, 2019. "Quality Recovery or Low-End Recovery? Profitability and Environmental Impact of Durable Product Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-37, March.
    12. Philipp Meyer-Brauns, 2014. "Optimal Auditing with Heterogeneous Audit Perceptions," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2014-06, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    13. Wenner, Lukas M., 2018. "Do sellers exploit biased beliefs of buyers? An experiment," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 194-215.
    14. Yinshi (Agnes) Gao & Saurabh Bansal & V. Daniel R. Guide, 2023. "OEM‐servicizing with a multiusecycle product: Model analysis and insights," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(12), pages 4021-4048, December.
    15. Adem Örsdemir & Vinayak Deshpande & Ali K. Parlaktürk, 2019. "Is Servicization a Win-Win Strategy? Profitability and Environmental Implications of Servicization," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 674-691, July.
    16. Erzurumlu, S. Sinan, 2013. "The compatibility of durable goods with contingent generic consumables," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 574-585.
    17. Pangburn, Michael S. & Stavrulaki, Euthemia, 2014. "Take back costs and product durability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 175-184.
    18. Oren Bar‐Gill & Rebecca Stone, 2012. "Pricing Misperceptions: Explaining Pricing Structure in the Cell Phone Service Market," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 430-456, September.
    19. Andrzej Baniak & Peter Grajzl, 2016. "Controlling Product Risks when Consumers Are Heterogeneously Overconfident: Producer Liability versus Minimum-Quality-Standard Regulation," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 172(2), pages 274-304, June.
    20. Mark Armstrong, 2016. "Nonlinear Pricing," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 583-614, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:17:y:2015:i:1:p:101-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.