IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v369y2024ics0306261924009073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic study of integrated high-temperature direct air capture with hydrogen-based calcination and Fischer–Tropsch synthesis for jet fuel production

Author

Listed:
  • Paulsen, M.M.
  • Petersen, S.B.
  • Lozano, E.M.
  • Pedersen, T.H.

Abstract

This work provides a comprehensive techno-economic assessment of high-temperature direct air capture (HTDAC) integrated with Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) for producing renewable jet fuel on a scale of approximately 25 t/h. Specifically, the HTDAC is based on calcium looping employing calcination in a hydrogen-based atmosphere to enable simultaneous RWGS reaction. A detailed description of the Aspen Plus model for HTDAC, alkaline and solid oxide electrolysis systems, RWGS reactor and the FTS is provided for future reference. Five system configurations are analysed, comparing the energy efficiency effects of hydrogen oxy-fuel combustion and electric calcination in a hydrogen-based atmosphere. In this regard, the potential omission of the RWGS reactor is examined, considering that 62 to 78 % of the CO2 is already converted into CO in the calciner, with the highest conversion rates achieved through electric calcination. Moreover, the study investigates the impact of alkaline electrolysis and solid oxide electrolysis on the system’s energy efficiency. Overall carbon efficiencies of more than 50 % in the jet fuel are achieved, with system energy efficiencies ranging from 30.6 to 39.0 % corresponding to fuel-specific energy consumption in the range of 122 to 156 MJ/kgJet fuel. Net present value (NPV) analysis reveals a projected minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) in the range of 4.45 to 6.32 €/L, which is significantly higher than previous literature estimates based on more optimistic cost assumptions. Uncertainties in cost parameters are addressed through a Monte Carlo analysis which shows the potential of a significant decrease in the MFSP provided that some of the cost estimates will be cheaper than the conservative initial estimate. Conclusively, this study highlights the significance of developing a financially feasible electrically heated calciner that can effectively handle high-temperature hydrogen. Furthermore, maximising the yield of jet fuel emerges as a critical factor for unlocking the future potential of the process, as it substantially reduces the cost of fuel production. Lastly, the reduction of hydrogen production costs is identified as the most crucial aspect in enhancing the economic viability of the process, as it serves as the biggest contributor to the high minimum fuel selling price.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulsen, M.M. & Petersen, S.B. & Lozano, E.M. & Pedersen, T.H., 2024. "Techno-economic study of integrated high-temperature direct air capture with hydrogen-based calcination and Fischer–Tropsch synthesis for jet fuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:369:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924009073
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924009073
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Ligang & Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Madi, Hossein & Diethelm, Stefan & herle, Jan Van & Maréchal, François, 2018. "Optimal design of solid-oxide electrolyzer based power-to-methane systems: A comprehensive comparison between steam electrolysis and co-electrolysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1060-1079.
    2. Jang, Dohyung & Cho, Hyun-Seok & Kang, Sanggyu, 2021. "Numerical modeling and analysis of the effect of pressure on the performance of an alkaline water electrolysis system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    3. Flavien M. Brethomé & Neil J. Williams & Charles A. Seipp & Michelle K. Kidder & Radu Custelcean, 2018. "Direct air capture of CO2 via aqueous-phase absorption and crystalline-phase release using concentrated solar power," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 553-559, July.
    4. Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Ridjan Skov, Iva & Dominković, Dominik Franjo & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Tan, Raymond & Duić, Neven & Hidayah Mohamad, Siti Nur & Wang, Xuebin, 2019. "Flexible Carbon Capture and Utilization technologies in future energy systems and the utilization pathways of captured CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Comidy, Liam J.F. & Staples, Mark D. & Barrett, Steven R.H., 2019. "Technical, economic, and environmental assessment of liquid fuel production on aircraft carriers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    6. Jarvis, Sean M. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2018. "Technologies and infrastructures underpinning future CO2 value chains: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 46-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Barbaresi & Mirko Morini & Agostino Gambarotta, 2022. "Review on the Status of the Research on Power-to-Gas Experimental Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-32, August.
    2. Tan, R.R. & Aviso, K.B. & Ng, D.K.S., 2019. "Optimization models for financing innovations in green energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Kate Dooley & Ellycia Harrould‐Kolieb & Anita Talberg, 2021. "Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity: A Threat Identification Framework," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S1), pages 34-44, April.
    4. Anjie Lu & Jianguo Zhou & Minglei Qin & Danchen Liu, 2024. "Considering Carbon–Hydrogen Coupled Integrated Energy Systems: A Pathway to Sustainable Energy Transition in China Under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-32, October.
    5. Yaowei Huang & Da Xu & Shuai Deng & Meng Lin, 2024. "A hybrid electro-thermochemical device for methane production from the air," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Zhong, Like & Yao, Erren & Zou, Hansen & Xi, Guang, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a directly solar-driven power-to-methane system by detailed distributed parameter method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    7. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-fuels with solid-oxide electrolyzer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    8. Chang, Yuan & Gao, Siqi & Ma, Qian & Wei, Ying & Li, Guoping, 2024. "Techno-economic analysis of carbon capture and utilization technologies and implications for China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. Xu, Chenyang & Wang, Jian & Wang, Jianzhong & Yang, Kun & Li, Guangzhong & Gao, Wenbin & Wang, Hao & Zhao, Shaoyang, 2024. "Structural optimization study on porous transport layers of sintered titanium for polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    10. Xing, Xuetao & Lin, Jin & Song, Yonghua & Hu, Qiang & Zhou, You & Mu, Shujun, 2018. "Optimization of hydrogen yield of a high-temperature electrolysis system with coordinated temperature and feed factors at various loading conditions: A model-based study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 368-385.
    11. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic comparison of green ammonia production processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    12. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2021. "Techno-economic comparison of 100% renewable urea production processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    13. Drechsler, Carsten & Agar, David W., 2020. "Intensified integrated direct air capture - power-to-gas process based on H2O and CO2 from ambient air," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    14. Brigagão, George Victor & de Medeiros, José Luiz & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Duić, Neven, 2021. "A zero-emission sustainable landfill-gas-to-wire oxyfuel process: Bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Alexander García-Mariaca & Eva Llera-Sastresa, 2021. "Review on Carbon Capture in ICE Driven Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-30, October.
    16. Zhang, Chen & Zhang, Xinqi & Su, Tingyu & Zhang, Yiheng & Wang, Liwei & Zhu, Xuancan, 2023. "Modification schemes of efficient sorbents for trace CO2 capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Qiu, Xiaoyan & Zhang, Hang & Qiu, Yiwei & Zhou, Yi & Zang, Tianlei & Zhou, Buxiang & Qi, Ruomei & Lin, Jin & Wang, Jiepeng, 2023. "Dynamic parameter estimation of the alkaline electrolysis system combining Bayesian inference and adaptive polynomial surrogate models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    18. Yang, Lin & Xu, Mao & Fan, Jingli & Liang, Xi & Zhang, Xian & Lv, Haodong & Wang, Dong, 2021. "Financing coal-fired power plant to demonstrate CCS (carbon capture and storage) through an innovative policy incentive in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Quarton, Christopher J. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2020. "The value of hydrogen and carbon capture, storage and utilisation in decarbonising energy: Insights from integrated value chain optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    20. Reznicek, Evan P. & Braun, Robert J., 2020. "Reversible solid oxide cell systems for integration with natural gas pipeline and carbon capture infrastructure for grid energy management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:369:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924009073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.