IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v360y2024ics0306261924001910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trajectory simulation and optimization for interactive electricity-carbon system evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Kai
  • Wang, Kunyu
  • Wu, Chengyu
  • Chen, Guo
  • Xue, Yusheng
  • Dong, Zhaoyang
  • Liu, Nian

Abstract

Many countries have set power system emissions reduction goals. However, in developing the electricity‑carbon system, regulators may prioritize final targets while overlooking the planning of pathways. The paper aims to develop a simulation framework for the long-term interactive evolution of electricity‑carbon systems and optimize a developing trajectory. To begin, the electricity system is modeled as a daily spot market over 365 days, and simulated by fast unit commitment (FUC) method. Then, considering the internal multi-player gaming, the multi-class mean field game (MMFG) theory is introduced to simulate the carbon market. Subsequently, a state transition equation for the electricity‑carbon evolution is formulated based on the concept of trajectory optimization from optimal control theory. Here, the regulator can steer the evolution by adjusting the carbon emission intensity benchmark (CEIB) in the carbon market. Finally, employing the Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradients (TD3) technique, the problem characterized by high-dimensional state space and continuous action space is efficiently solved. The effectiveness of the proposed method is examined by case studies on a provincial-scale grid with over 200 units, where the optimal CEIB can be achieved within a second and the control precision of trajectory evolution can be limited to 2%.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Kai & Wang, Kunyu & Wu, Chengyu & Chen, Guo & Xue, Yusheng & Dong, Zhaoyang & Liu, Nian, 2024. "Trajectory simulation and optimization for interactive electricity-carbon system evolution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:360:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924001910
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924001910
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryna Yiyun Cui & Nathan Hultman & Diyang Cui & Haewon McJeon & Sha Yu & Morgan R. Edwards & Arijit Sen & Kaihui Song & Christina Bowman & Leon Clarke & Junjie Kang & Jiehong Lou & Fuqiang Yang & Jiaha, 2021. "A plant-by-plant strategy for high-ambition coal power phaseout in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Chaton, Corinne & Creti, Anna & Peluchon, Benoît, 2015. "Banking and back-loading emission permits," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 332-341.
    3. Li, Junkai & Ge, Shaoyun & Liu, Hong & Yu, Qi & Zhang, Shida & Wang, Chengshan & Gu, Chenghong, 2024. "An electricity and carbon trading mechanism integrated with TSO-DSO-prosumer coordination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    4. Tang, Ling & Shi, Jiarui & Bao, Qin, 2016. "Designing an emissions trading scheme for China with a dynamic computable general equilibrium model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 507-520.
    5. Sun, Qingkai & Wang, Xiaojun & Liu, Zhao & Mirsaeidi, Sohrab & He, Jinghan & Pei, Wei, 2022. "Multi-agent energy management optimization for integrated energy systems under the energy and carbon co-trading market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    6. Bel, Germà & Joseph, Stephan, 2015. "Emission abatement: Untangling the impacts of the EU ETS and the economic crisis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 531-539.
    7. Xenophon, Aleksis Kazubiernis & Hill, David John, 2019. "Emissions reduction and wholesale electricity price targeting using an output-based mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1050-1063.
    8. Zhu, Bangzhu & Han, Dong & Chevallier, Julien & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Dynamic multiscale interactions between European carbon and electricity markets during 2005–2016," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 309-322.
    9. Jiang, Kai & Yan, Xiaohe & Liu, Nian & Wang, Peng, 2022. "Energy trade-offs in coupled ICM and electricity market under dynamic carbon emission intensity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    10. Dimitriadis, Christos N. & Tsimopoulos, Evangelos G. & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2023. "Optimal bidding strategy of a gas-fired power plant in interdependent low-carbon electricity and natural gas markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    11. Ghasemnejad, Homayoun & Rashidinejad, Masoud & Abdollahi, Amir & Dorahaki, Sobhan, 2024. "Energy management in citizen energy communities: A flexibility-constrained robust optimization approach considering prosumers comfort," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    12. Zhang, Lirong & Li, Yakun & Jia, Zhijie, 2018. "Impact of carbon allowance allocation on power industry in China’s carbon trading market: Computable general equilibrium based analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 814-827.
    13. Zhang, Menghan & Yang, Zhifang & Lin, Wei & Yu, Juan & Dai, Wei & Du, Ershun, 2021. "Enhancing economics of power systems through fast unit commitment with high time resolution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    14. Li, Yan & Feng, Tian-tian & Liu, Li-li & Zhang, Meng-xi, 2023. "How do the electricity market and carbon market interact and achieve integrated development?--A bibliometric-based review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/14770 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Kai & Yan, Xiaohe & Liu, Nian & Wang, Peng, 2022. "Energy trade-offs in coupled ICM and electricity market under dynamic carbon emission intensity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    2. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Arfaoui, Nadia, 2023. "Exploring downside risk dependence across energy markets: Electricity, conventional energy, carbon, and clean energy during episodes of market crises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    3. Li, Yan & Feng, Tian-tian & Liu, Li-li & Zhang, Meng-xi, 2023. "How do the electricity market and carbon market interact and achieve integrated development?--A bibliometric-based review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2019. "Impacts of carbon price level in carbon emission trading market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 157-170.
    5. Simon Quemin & Raphael Trotignon, 2018. "Competitive Permit Storage and Market Design: An Application to the EU-ETS," Working Papers 2018.19, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    6. Brown, Marilyn A. & Li, Yufei & Soni, Anmol, 2020. "Are all jobs created equal? Regional employment impacts of a U.S. carbon tax," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. Yanbin Li & Dan Nie & Bingkang Li & Xiyu Li, 2020. "The Spillover Effect between Carbon Emission Trading (CET) Price and Power Company Stock Price in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Andrianesis, Panagiotis & Biskas, Pandelis & Liberopoulos, George, 2021. "Evaluating the cost of emissions in a pool-based electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    9. Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Jingyun & Wang, Bo & Hui, Ng Szu & Lu, Bin & Wang, Can & Xu, Shuling & Zhou, Zixuan & Zhang, Bin & Zheng, Yufeng, 2024. "The decarbonization pathway of power system by high-resolution model under different policy scenarios in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    10. Richard S J Tol, 2018. "Policy Brief—Leaving an Emissions Trading Scheme: Implications for the United Kingdom and the European Union," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 183-189.
    11. Yolanda Fernández Fernández & María Angeles Fernández López & David González Hernández & Blanca Olmedillas Blanco, 2018. "Institutional Change and Environment: Lessons from the European Emission Trading System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    12. He, Liuyue & Xu, Zhenci & Wang, Sufen & Bao, Jianxia & Fan, Yunfei & Daccache, Andre, 2022. "Optimal crop planting pattern can be harmful to reach carbon neutrality: Evidence from food-energy-water-carbon nexus perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    13. Fan, Ying & Jia, Jun-Jun & Wang, Xin & Xu, Jin-Hua, 2017. "What policy adjustments in the EU ETS truly affected the carbon prices?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 145-164.
    14. Ren, Shenggang & Hu, Yucai & Zheng, Jingjing & Wang, Yangjie, 2020. "Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Julien Lefevre, 2018. "Modeling the Socioeconomic Impacts of the Adoption of a Carbon Pricing Instrument – Literature review," CIRED Working Papers hal-03128619, HAL.
    16. Quemin, Simon & Trotignon, Raphaël, 2021. "Emissions trading with rolling horizons," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    17. Zhang, Jiekuan, 2023. "Emissions trading scheme and energy consumption and output structure: Evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    18. Zhu, Bangzhu & Yuan, Lili & Ye, Shunxin, 2019. "Examining the multi-timescales of European carbon market with grey relational analysis and empirical mode decomposition," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 517(C), pages 392-399.
    19. Wang, Feng & Liu, Xiying & Nguyen, Tue Anh, 2018. "Evaluating the economic impacts and feasibility of China's energy cap: Based on an Analytic General Equilibrium Model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 114-126.
    20. Tang, Ling & Wu, Jiaqian & Yu, Lean & Bao, Qin, 2017. "Carbon allowance auction design of China's emissions trading scheme: A multi-agent-based approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 30-40.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:360:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924001910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.