IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v360y2024ics0306261924001363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calibration of building energy computer models via bias-corrected iteratively reweighted least squares method

Author

Listed:
  • Jeong, Cheoljoon
  • Byon, Eunshin

Abstract

As the building sector contributes approximately three-quarters of the U.S. electricity load, analyzing buildings’ energy consumption patterns and establishing their effective operational strategy become of great importance. To achieve those goals, a physics-based building energy model (BEM), which can simulate a building’s energy demand under various weather conditions and operational scenarios, has been developed. To obtain accurate simulation outputs, it is necessary to calibrate some parameters required for the BEM’s pre-configuration. The BEM calibration is usually accomplished by matching the simulated energy use with the measured one. However, even with the efforts to calibrate the BEM at best, a systematic discrepancy between the two quantities is often observed, preventing the precise estimation of the energy demand. Such discrepancy is referred to as bias in this study. We present a new calibration approach that models the discrepancy to correct the relationship between the simulated and measured energy use. We show that our bias correction can improve predictive performance. Additionally, we observe the heterogeneous variance in the electricity loads, especially in the afternoon hours, which often reduces prediction accuracy and increases uncertainty. To address this issue, we incorporate heterogeneous weights into the least squares loss function. To implement the bias-correction procedure with the weighted least squares formulation, we propose a newly devised iteratively reweighted least squares algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed calibration methodology is evaluated with a real-world dataset collected from a residential building in Texas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeong, Cheoljoon & Byon, Eunshin, 2024. "Calibration of building energy computer models via bias-corrected iteratively reweighted least squares method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:360:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924001363
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924001363
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menezes, Anna Carolina & Cripps, Andrew & Bouchlaghem, Dino & Buswell, Richard, 2012. "Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 355-364.
    2. Cheoljoon Jeong & Ziang Xu & Albert S. Berahas & Eunshin Byon & Kristen Cetin, 2023. "Multiblock Parameter Calibration in Computer Models," INFORMS Joural on Data Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 116-137, October.
    3. Lü, Xiaoshu & Lu, Tao & Kibert, Charles J. & Viljanen, Martti, 2015. "Modeling and forecasting energy consumption for heterogeneous buildings using a physical–statistical approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 261-275.
    4. Lee, Yi-Shian & Tong, Lee-Ing, 2012. "Forecasting nonlinear time series of energy consumption using a hybrid dynamic model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 251-256.
    5. Peter Frazier & Warren Powell & Savas Dayanik, 2009. "The Knowledge-Gradient Policy for Correlated Normal Beliefs," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 599-613, November.
    6. Manfren, Massimiliano & Aste, Niccolò & Moshksar, Reza, 2013. "Calibration and uncertainty analysis for computer models – A meta-model based approach for integrated building energy simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 627-641.
    7. Youngjun Choe & Henry Lam & Eunshin Byon, 2018. "Uncertainty Quantification of Stochastic Simulation for Black-box Computer Experiments," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1155-1172, December.
    8. Kim, Yang-Seon & Heidarinejad, Mohammad & Dahlhausen, Matthew & Srebric, Jelena, 2017. "Building energy model calibration with schedules derived from electricity use data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 997-1007.
    9. Roustant, Olivier & Ginsbourger, David & Deville, Yves, 2012. "DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R Packages for the Analysis of Computer Experiments by Kriging-Based Metamodeling and Optimization," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 51(i01).
    10. Marc C. Kennedy & Anthony O'Hagan, 2001. "Bayesian calibration of computer models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(3), pages 425-464.
    11. Granderson, Jessica & Touzani, Samir & Custodio, Claudine & Sohn, Michael D. & Jump, David & Fernandes, Samuel, 2016. "Accuracy of automated measurement and verification (M&V) techniques for energy savings in commercial buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 296-308.
    12. Wang, Jingxing & Chung, Seokhyun & AlShelahi, Abdullah & Kontar, Raed & Byon, Eunshin & Saigal, Romesh, 2021. "Look-ahead decision making for renewable energy: A dynamic “predict and store” approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    13. Alexander Shapiro & Jos Berge, 2002. "Statistical inference of minimum rank factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 79-94, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chaudhary, Gaurav & New, Joshua & Sanyal, Jibonananda & Im, Piljae & O’Neill, Zheng & Garg, Vishal, 2016. "Evaluation of “Autotune” calibration against manual calibration of building energy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 115-134.
    2. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Tran, Duc-Son, 2018. "Forecasting energy consumption time series using machine learning techniques based on usage patterns of residential householders," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 709-726.
    3. Kamiński, Bogumił, 2015. "A method for the updating of stochastic kriging metamodels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 859-866.
    4. Krityakierne, Tipaluck & Baowan, Duangkamon, 2020. "Aggregated GP-based Optimization for Contaminant Source Localization," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    5. Wu, Xu & Kozlowski, Tomasz & Meidani, Hadi, 2018. "Kriging-based inverse uncertainty quantification of nuclear fuel performance code BISON fission gas release model using time series measurement data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 422-436.
    6. Carstens, Herman & Xia, Xiaohua & Yadavalli, Sarma, 2017. "Low-cost energy meter calibration method for measurement and verification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 563-575.
    7. Ardeshir Mahdavi & Christiane Berger & Hadeer Amin & Eleni Ampatzi & Rune Korsholm Andersen & Elie Azar & Verena M. Barthelmes & Matteo Favero & Jakob Hahn & Dolaana Khovalyg & Henrik N. Knudsen & Ale, 2021. "The Role of Occupants in Buildings’ Energy Performance Gap: Myth or Reality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-44, March.
    8. Tronchin, Lamberto & Manfren, Massimiliano & James, Patrick AB., 2018. "Linking design and operation performance analysis through model calibration: Parametric assessment on a Passive House building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 26-40.
    9. Calama-González, Carmen María & Symonds, Phil & Petrou, Giorgos & Suárez, Rafael & León-Rodríguez, Ángel Luis, 2021. "Bayesian calibration of building energy models for uncertainty analysis through test cells monitoring," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    10. Wate, P. & Iglesias, M. & Coors, V. & Robinson, D., 2020. "Framework for emulation and uncertainty quantification of a stochastic building performance simulator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Aste, Niccolò & Leonforte, Fabrizio & Manfren, Massimiliano & Mazzon, Manlio, 2015. "Thermal inertia and energy efficiency – Parametric simulation assessment on a calibrated case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 111-123.
    12. Yang, Zheng & Becerik-Gerber, Burcin, 2015. "A model calibration framework for simultaneous multi-level building energy simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 415-431.
    13. Mohammadi, Hossein & Challenor, Peter & Goodfellow, Marc, 2019. "Emulating dynamic non-linear simulators using Gaussian processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 178-196.
    14. Wang, Wei & Hong, Tianzhen & Li, Nan & Wang, Ryan Qi & Chen, Jiayu, 2019. "Linking energy-cyber-physical systems with occupancy prediction and interpretation through WiFi probe-based ensemble classification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 55-69.
    15. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2013. "Simulation-Optimization via Kriging and Bootstrapping : A Survey (Revision of CentER DP 2011-064)," Discussion Paper 2013-064, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    16. Massimiliano Manfren & Maurizio Sibilla & Lamberto Tronchin, 2021. "Energy Modelling and Analytics in the Built Environment—A Review of Their Role for Energy Transitions in the Construction Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-29, January.
    17. Yuan, Jun & Nian, Victor & Su, Bin & Meng, Qun, 2017. "A simultaneous calibration and parameter ranking method for building energy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 657-666.
    18. Marzouk, Mohamed & Seleem, Noreihan, 2018. "Assessment of existing buildings performance using system dynamics technique," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1308-1323.
    19. Satyajith Amaran & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Bikram Sharda & Scott J. Bury, 2016. "Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 351-380, May.
    20. Ciulla, Giuseppina & Lo Brano, Valerio & D’Amico, Antonino, 2016. "Modelling relationship among energy demand, climate and office building features: A cluster analysis at European level," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1021-1034.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:360:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924001363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.