IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v331y2023ics0306261922016592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A three-layer joint distributionally robust chance-constrained framework for optimal day-ahead scheduling of e-mobility ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Bagheri Tookanlou, Mahsa
  • Pourmousavi, S. Ali
  • Marzband, Mousa

Abstract

A high number of electric vehicles (EVs) in the transportation sector necessitates an advanced scheduling framework for e-mobility ecosystem operation to overcome range anxiety and create a viable business model for charging stations (CSs). The framework must account for the stochastic nature of all stakeholders’ operations, including EV drivers, CSs, and retailers and their mutual interactions. In this paper, a three-layer joint distributionally robust chance-constrained (DRCC) model is proposed to plan day-ahead grid-to-vehicle (G2V) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) operations for e-mobility ecosystems. The proposed three-layer joint DRCC framework formulates the interactions of the stochastic behaviour of the stakeholders in an uncertain environment with unknown probability distributions. The proposed stochastic model does not rely on a specific probability distribution for stochastic parameters. An iterative process is proposed to solve the problem using joint DRCC formulation. To achieve computational tractability, the second-order cone programming reformulation is implemented for double-sided and single-sided chance constraints (CCs). Furthermore, the impact of the temporal correlation of uncertain PV generation on CSs operation is considered in the formulation. A simulation study is carried out for an ecosystem of three retailers, nine CSs, and 600 EVs based on real data from San Francisco, USA. The simulation results show the necessity and applicability of such a scheduling framework for the e-mobility ecosystem in an uncertain environment, e.g., by reducing the number of unique EVs that failed to reach their destination from 272 to 61. In addition, the choice of confidence level significantly affects the cost and revenue of the stakeholders as well as the accuracy of the schedules in real-time operation, e.g., for a low-risk case study, the total net cost of EVs increased by 247.3% compared to a high-risk case study. Also, the total net revenue of CSs and retailers decreased by 26.6% and 10.6%, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Bagheri Tookanlou, Mahsa & Pourmousavi, S. Ali & Marzband, Mousa, 2023. "A three-layer joint distributionally robust chance-constrained framework for optimal day-ahead scheduling of e-mobility ecosystem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:331:y:2023:i:c:s0306261922016592
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922016592
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daryabari, Mohamad K. & Keypour, Reza & Golmohamadi, Hessam, 2020. "Stochastic energy management of responsive plug-in electric vehicles characterizing parking lot aggregators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Schücking, Maximilian & Jochem, Patrick, 2021. "Two-stage stochastic program optimizing the cost of electric vehicles in commercial fleets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    3. Zeynali, Saeed & Nasiri, Nima & Marzband, Mousa & Ravadanegh, Sajad Najafi, 2021. "A hybrid robust-stochastic framework for strategic scheduling of integrated wind farm and plug-in hybrid electric vehicle fleets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    4. Zheng, Yanchong & Yu, Hang & Shao, Ziyun & Jian, Linni, 2020. "Day-ahead bidding strategy for electric vehicle aggregator enabling multiple agent modes in uncertain electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    5. Ernst Roos & Dick den Hertog, 2020. "Reducing Conservatism in Robust Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1109-1127, October.
    6. Su, Jun & Lie, T.T. & Zamora, Ramon, 2020. "A rolling horizon scheduling of aggregated electric vehicles charging under the electricity exchange market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Jian, Linni & Zheng, Yanchong & Xiao, Xinping & Chan, C.C., 2015. "Optimal scheduling for vehicle-to-grid operation with stochastic connection of plug-in electric vehicles to smart grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 150-161.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Tianren & Huang, Yuping & Liao, Hui & Liang, Yu, 2023. "A hybrid electric vehicle load classification and forecasting approach based on GBDT algorithm and temporal convolutional network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Ziling & Wang, Tingsong & Qu, Xiaobo, 2024. "En-route charge scheduling for an electric bus network: Stochasticity and real-world practice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Ming, Fangzhu & Gao, Feng & Liu, Kun & Li, Xingqi, 2023. "A constrained DRL-based bi-level coordinated method for large-scale EVs charging," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    3. Lei, Xiang & Yu, Hang & Shao, Ziyun & Jian, Linni, 2023. "Optimal bidding and coordinating strategy for maximal marginal revenue due to V2G operation: Distribution system operator as a key player in China's uncertain electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Liu, Lu & Zhou, Kaile, 2022. "Electric vehicle charging scheduling considering urgent demand under different charging modes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Wang, Yubin & Dong, Wei & Yang, Qiang, 2022. "Multi-stage optimal energy management of multi-energy microgrid in deregulated electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    6. Golmohamadi, Hessam, 2022. "Demand-side management in industrial sector: A review of heavy industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Gharibi, Mohamad Amin & Nafisi, Hamed & Askarian-abyaneh, Hossein & Hajizadeh, Amin, 2023. "Deep learning framework for day-ahead optimal charging scheduling of electric vehicles in parking lot," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    8. Graabak, Ingeborg & Wu, Qiuwei & Warland, Leif & Liu, Zhaoxi, 2016. "Optimal planning of the Nordic transmission system with 100% electric vehicle penetration of passenger cars by 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 648-660.
    9. Wu, Di & Radhakrishnan, Nikitha & Huang, Sen, 2019. "A hierarchical charging control of plug-in electric vehicles with simple flexibility model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Mehrdad Tarafdar-Hagh & Kamran Taghizad-Tavana & Mohsen Ghanbari-Ghalehjoughi & Sayyad Nojavan & Parisa Jafari & Amin Mohammadpour Shotorbani, 2023. "Optimizing Electric Vehicle Operations for a Smart Environment: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Sun, Shitong & Kazemi-Razi, S. Mahdi & Kaigutha, Lisa G. & Marzband, Mousa & Nafisi, Hamed & Al-Sumaiti, Ameena Saad, 2022. "Day-ahead offering strategy in the market for concentrating solar power considering thermoelectric decoupling by a compressed air energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    12. Heydarian-Forushani, E. & Golshan, M.E.H. & Shafie-khah, M., 2016. "Flexible interaction of plug-in electric vehicle parking lots for efficient wind integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 338-349.
    13. Zeynali, Saeed & Nasiri, Nima & Ravadanegh, Sajad Najafi & Marzband, Mousa, 2022. "A three-level framework for strategic participation of aggregated electric vehicle-owning households in local electricity and thermal energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    14. Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Muhammad Khuram Shahzad & Akif Zia Khan & Dong Ryeol Shin, 2017. "Smart Distribution Networks: A Review of Modern Distribution Concepts from a Planning Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-47, April.
    15. García-Villalobos, J. & Zamora, I. & Knezović, K. & Marinelli, M., 2016. "Multi-objective optimization control of plug-in electric vehicles in low voltage distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 155-168.
    16. Sun, Yunpeng & Razzaq, Asif & Sun, Huaping & Irfan, Muhammad, 2022. "The asymmetric influence of renewable energy and green innovation on carbon neutrality in China: Analysis from non-linear ARDL model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 334-343.
    17. Golmohamadi, Hessam & Larsen, Kim Guldstrand & Jensen, Peter Gjøl & Hasrat, Imran Riaz, 2022. "Integration of flexibility potentials of district heating systems into electricity markets: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    18. Pavić, Ivan & Capuder, Tomislav & Kuzle, Igor, 2016. "Low carbon technologies as providers of operational flexibility in future power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 724-738.
    19. Krzysztof Zagrajek & Mariusz Kłos & Desire D. Rasolomampionona & Mirosław Lewandowski & Karol Pawlak, 2023. "The Novel Approach of Using Electric Vehicles as a Resource to Mitigate the Negative Effects of Power Rationing on Non-Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-36, December.
    20. Park, Keonwoo & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2022. "Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach for EV charging scheduling in a smart grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:331:y:2023:i:c:s0306261922016592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.