IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v321y2022ics0306261922007310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic analysis of CCUS: Accelerated development for CO2 EOR and storage in residual oil zones under the context of 45Q tax credit

Author

Listed:
  • Ren, Bo
  • Male, Frank
  • Duncan, Ian J.

Abstract

Residual oil zones (ROZ) undergoing CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO2-EOR) may benefit from specific strategies to maximize their value. We evaluated several strategies for producing from a Permian Basin, West Texas, USA field’s ROZ. This ROZ lies below the main pay zone (MPZ) of the field. Such brownfield ROZs occur in the Permian Basin and elsewhere. Since brownfield ROZs are hydraulically connected to the MPZs, development sequences and schemes influence oil production, CO2 storage, and net present value (NPV). We conducted economic assessments of various CO2 injection/production schemes in the stacked ROZ-MPZ reservoir based on flow simulations of a high-resolution geocellular model built from wireline logs and core data and calibrated through production history matching. Flow simulations of water alternating gas (WAG) injection, such as switching injection from the MPZ to the ROZ and commingled production, were studied. Simulation results showed that simultaneous CO2 injection into the MPZ and ROZ lead to the largest oil production and, generally, the largest NPV. If instead, CO2 was simultaneously injected into the MPZ and ROZ, then into the ROZ alone, this maximized CO2 storage. CO2 storage can be used as a tax credit under the Internal Revenue Code, Section 45Q. Storage performance depends on the development approach and WAG ratio. Developing the ROZ increased storage compared to only producing from the MPZ. The WAG ratio to maximize oil production did not always yield the largest NPV. These findings are potentially applied to other Brownfield ROZs, which are common below San Andres reservoirs in the Permian Basin and other basins. ROZ development can increase oilfields’ NPV and carbon storage potential. Our study can serve as an analog for similar reservoirs. This work provides valuable insights into the further optimization of brownfield ROZ development and information for operators to plan to develop stacked ROZ-MPZ reservoirs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren, Bo & Male, Frank & Duncan, Ian J., 2022. "Economic analysis of CCUS: Accelerated development for CO2 EOR and storage in residual oil zones under the context of 45Q tax credit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:321:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922007310
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922007310
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Xiao & van ’t Veld, Klaas & Marcy, Peter & Huzurbazar, Snehalata & Alvarado, Vladimir, 2018. "Economic co-optimization of oil recovery and CO2 sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 132-147.
    2. Jiang, Jieyun & Rui, Zhenhua & Hazlett, Randy & Lu, Jun, 2019. "An integrated technical-economic model for evaluating CO2 enhanced oil recovery development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 190-211.
    3. Ren, Bo & Duncan, Ian J., 2019. "Reservoir simulation of carbon storage associated with CO2 EOR in residual oil zones, San Andres formation of West Texas, Permian Basin, USA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 391-401.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hou, Lei & Elsworth, Derek & Zhang, Lei & Gong, Peibin & Liu, Honglei, 2024. "Recalibration of CO2 storage in shale: prospective and contingent storage resources, and capacity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    2. Min Thura Mon & Roengchai Tansuchat & Woraphon Yamaka, 2024. "CCUS Technology and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from the United States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Ning Lin & Liying Xu, 2024. "Navigating the Implementation of Tax Credits for Natural-Gas-Based Low-Carbon-Intensity Hydrogen Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Wu, Qianhui & Ding, Lei & Zhao, Lun & Alhashboul, Almohannad A. & Almajid, Muhammad M. & Patil, Pramod & Zhao, Wenqi & Fan, Zifei, 2024. "CO2 soluble surfactants for carbon storage in carbonate saline aquifers with achievable injectivity: Implications from the continuous CO2 injection study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    5. Zhenhua Xu & Lianwu Zhou & Shuiping Ma & Jianxun Qin & Xiaodi Huang & Bo Han & Longqing Yang & Yun Luo & Pengcheng Liu, 2023. "Study on CO 2 Huff-n-Puff Development Rule of Horizontal Wells in Heavy Oil Reservoir by Taking Liuguanzhuang Oilfield in Dagang as an Example," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Wang, Yihan & Wen, Zongguo & Xu, Mao & Kosajan, Vorada, 2024. "The carbon-energy-water nexus of the carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology deployment schemes: A case study in China's cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdoli, B. & Hooshmand, F. & MirHassani, S.A., 2023. "A novel stochastic programming model under endogenous uncertainty for the CCS-EOR planning problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    2. Farajzadeh, R. & Eftekhari, A.A. & Dafnomilis, G. & Lake, L.W. & Bruining, J., 2020. "On the sustainability of CO2 storage through CO2 – Enhanced oil recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    3. Ajoma, Emmanuel & Saira, & Sungkachart, Thanarat & Ge, Jiachao & Le-Hussain, Furqan, 2020. "Water-saturated CO2 injection to improve oil recovery and CO2 storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Yang, Renfeng & Zhang, Jinqing & Chen, Han & Jiang, Ruizhong & Sun, Zhe & Rui, Zhenhua, 2019. "The injectivity variation prediction model for water flooding oilfields sustainable development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Xiao, Caiyun & Ni, Hongjian & Shi, Xian, 2022. "Unsteady model for wellbore pressure transmission of carbon dioxide fracturing considering limited-flow outlet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    6. Chen, Bailian & Pawar, Rajesh J., 2019. "Characterization of CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery in residual oil zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 291-304.
    7. Moreaux, Michel & Amigues, Jean-Pierre & van der Meijden, Gerard & Withagen, Cees, 2024. "Carbon capture: Storage vs. Utilization," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Zeming Ji & Chang He & Yingying Sun & Xiaokun Yue & Hongxu Fang & Xiaoqing Lu & Siyuan Liu & Weifeng Lyu, 2023. "Molecular Dynamics Simulation of CO 2 Storage in Reservoir Pores with a Dead-End," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Ren, Bo & Duncan, Ian J., 2021. "Maximizing oil production from water alternating gas (CO2) injection into residual oil zones: The impact of oil saturation and heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. Guo, Tiankui & Zhang, Yuelong & He, Jiayuan & Gong, Facheng & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2021. "Research on geothermal development model of abandoned high temperature oil reservoir in North China oilfield," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-12.
    11. Nicoletti, Jack & You, Fengqi, 2020. "Multiobjective economic and environmental optimization of global crude oil purchase and sale planning with noncooperative stakeholders," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    12. Becerra-Fernandez, Mauricio & Cosenz, Federico & Dyner, Isaac, 2020. "Modeling the natural gas supply chain for sustainable growth policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    13. Liu, Yueliang & Rui, Zhenhua & Yang, Tao & Dindoruk, Birol, 2022. "Using propanol as an additive to CO2 for improving CO2 utilization and storage in oil reservoirs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    14. Amirsardari, Mahdi & Afsari, Khalil, 2024. "Pore-to-field scale modeling of residual gas trapping in tight carbonate underground gas reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    15. Chen, Long & Xu, Guiyin & Rui, Zhenhua & Alshawabkeh, Akram N., 2019. "Demonstration of a feasible energy-water-environment nexus: Waste sulfur dioxide for water treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1011-1022.
    16. Wu, Jie & Guluzada, Esmira & Karimzada, Mehriban, 2024. "The sustainable use of natural resource markets: Moving toward greener horizons," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    17. Tayari, Farid & Blumsack, Seth, 2020. "A real options approach to production and injection timing under uncertainty for CO2 sequestration in depleted shale gas reservoirs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    18. Roussanaly, S. & Aasen, A. & Anantharaman, R. & Danielsen, B. & Jakobsen, J. & Heme-De-Lacotte, L. & Neji, G. & Sødal, A. & Wahl, P.E. & Vrana, T.K. & Dreux, R., 2019. "Offshore power generation with carbon capture and storage to decarbonise mainland electricity and offshore oil and gas installations: A techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 478-494.
    19. Christiano B. Peres & Pedro M. R. Resende & Leonel J. R. Nunes & Leandro C. de Morais, 2022. "Advances in Carbon Capture and Use (CCU) Technologies: A Comprehensive Review and CO 2 Mitigation Potential Analysis," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Alirza Orujov & Kipp Coddington & Saman A. Aryana, 2023. "A Review of CCUS in the Context of Foams, Regulatory Frameworks and Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-41, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:321:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922007310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.