IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v222y2021ics036054422100164x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximizing oil production from water alternating gas (CO2) injection into residual oil zones: The impact of oil saturation and heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Ren, Bo
  • Duncan, Ian J.

Abstract

Residual oil zones (ROZs) are widespread reservoirs, characterized by oil at residual saturation, either underlying oil fields (brownfield) or lateral (greenfield) to such fields. These reservoirs have the potential to produce volumes of oil sufficiently significant to make appreciable impacts on the US’s oil reserves and associated incidental CO2 sequestration. The objective of this study is to improve our understanding the impact of heterogeneous and low oil saturations, in brownfield ROZs, on the effectiveness of water alternating gas (WAG) injection strategies. ROZs occur in the Permian Basin and elsewhere, and operators are using CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in these zones. The consensus model for the formation of ROZs is that they were formed by the effect of faster regional aquifer flow, acting over millions of years. Both the magnitude of oil saturation and the spatial distribution of oil differ from water-flooded main pay zones (MPZs). To explore the most effective injection strategies, we conducted simulations of CO2 injection into synthetic geologic reservoirs. These simulations focused on injection into reservoirs subject to either man-made waterflooding or long-term natural waterflooding. By exploring the impact of varying: oil saturation; well patterns; reservoir heterogeneity; and permeability anisotropy, we attempt to quantify the factors that most influence the effectiveness of WAG injection. WAG ratios (the ratio of injected water and CO2, in reservoir volumes) of interest are those that either minimize the net CO2 utilization ratios or maximize oil production rates. In general, the most effective WAG ratios for ROZs, are consistently less than those observed undergoing CO2 injection in the same geologic reservoir models after traditional (man-made) waterflooding. This work demonstrates that most favorable WAG ratios for oil production in ROZs are different from those in traditional MPZs because of oil saturation differences. Thus, CO2 injection into both zones or directly copying WAG injection designs from MPZs to ROZs might not maximize oil production.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren, Bo & Duncan, Ian J., 2021. "Maximizing oil production from water alternating gas (CO2) injection into residual oil zones: The impact of oil saturation and heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:222:y:2021:i:c:s036054422100164x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422100164X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.119915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ren, Bo & Duncan, Ian J., 2019. "Reservoir simulation of carbon storage associated with CO2 EOR in residual oil zones, San Andres formation of West Texas, Permian Basin, USA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 391-401.
    2. Chen, Bailian & Pawar, Rajesh J., 2019. "Characterization of CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery in residual oil zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 291-304.
    3. William Ampomah & Robert S. Balch & Reid B. Grigg & Brian McPherson & Robert A. Will & Si‐Yong Lee & Zhenxue Dai & Feng Pan, 2017. "Co‐optimization of CO 2 ‐EOR and storage processes in mature oil reservoirs," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 128-142, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ming Gao & Zhaoxia Liu & Shihao Qian & Wanlu Liu & Weirong Li & Hengfei Yin & Jinhong Cao, 2023. "Machine-Learning-Based Approach to Optimize CO 2 -WAG Flooding in Low Permeability Oil Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Amirsardari, Mahdi & Afsari, Khalil, 2024. "Pore-to-field scale modeling of residual gas trapping in tight carbonate underground gas reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    3. Hengli Wang & Leng Tian & Kaiqiang Zhang & Zongke Liu & Can Huang & Lili Jiang & Xiaolong Chai, 2021. "How Is Ultrasonic-Assisted CO 2 EOR to Unlock Oils from Unconventional Reservoirs?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Guo, Yaohao & Liu, Fen & Qiu, Junjie & Xu, Zhi & Bao, Bo, 2022. "Microscopic transport and phase behaviors of CO2 injection in heterogeneous formations using microfluidics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    5. Hao, Yongmao & Li, Zongfa & Su, Yuliang & Kong, Chuixian & Chen, Hong & Meng, Yang, 2022. "Experimental investigation of CO2 storage and oil production of different CO2 injection methods at pore-scale and core-scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Mingyu & Su, Yuliang & Elsworth, Derek & Li, Lei & Fan, Liyao, 2021. "Hydro-mechanical-chemical modeling of sub-nanopore capillary-confinement on CO2-CCUS-EOR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Steele, Amanda Harker & Sharma, Smriti & Pena Cabra, Ivonne & Clahane, Luke & Iyengar, Arun, 2023. "A tool for measuring the system cost of replacement energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Vo Thanh, Hung & Lee, Kang-Kun, 2022. "Application of machine learning to predict CO2 trapping performance in deep saline aquifers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    4. Zhang, Kai & Lau, Hon Chung & Bokka, Harsha Kumar & Hadia, Nanji J., 2022. "Decarbonizing the power and industry sectors in India by carbon capture and storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Wang, H.D. & Chen, Y. & Ma, G.W., 2020. "Effects of capillary pressures on two-phase flow of immiscible carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery in fractured media," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. You, Junyu & Ampomah, William & Sun, Qian, 2020. "Co-optimizing water-alternating-carbon dioxide injection projects using a machine learning assisted computational framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. Xiao, Caiyun & Ni, Hongjian & Shi, Xian, 2022. "Unsteady model for wellbore pressure transmission of carbon dioxide fracturing considering limited-flow outlet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    8. Zhou, Xiang & Li, Xiuluan & Shen, Dehuang & Shi, Lanxiang & Zhang, Zhien & Sun, Xinge & Jiang, Qi, 2022. "CO2 huff-n-puff process to enhance heavy oil recovery and CO2 storage: An integration study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    9. Yunqi Jiang & Huaqing Zhang & Kai Zhang & Jian Wang & Shiti Cui & Jianfa Han & Liming Zhang & Jun Yao, 2022. "Reservoir Characterization and Productivity Forecast Based on Knowledge Interaction Neural Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Huang, Xianfu & Zhao, Ya-Pu, 2023. "Evolution of pore structure and adsorption-desorption in oil shale formation rocks after compression," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    11. Vo Thanh, Hung & Sheini Dashtgoli, Danial & Zhang, Hemeng & Min, Baehyun, 2023. "Machine-learning-based prediction of oil recovery factor for experimental CO2-Foam chemical EOR: Implications for carbon utilization projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    12. Vo Thanh, Hung & Yasin, Qamar & Al-Mudhafar, Watheq J. & Lee, Kang-Kun, 2022. "Knowledge-based machine learning techniques for accurate prediction of CO2 storage performance in underground saline aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    13. Amirsardari, Mahdi & Afsari, Khalil, 2024. "Pore-to-field scale modeling of residual gas trapping in tight carbonate underground gas reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    14. Hao, Yongmao & Li, Zongfa & Su, Yuliang & Kong, Chuixian & Chen, Hong & Meng, Yang, 2022. "Experimental investigation of CO2 storage and oil production of different CO2 injection methods at pore-scale and core-scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    15. Qureshi, M Fahed & Khandelwal, Himanshu & Usadi, Adam & Barckholtz, Timothy A. & Mhadeshwar, Ashish B. & Linga, Praveen, 2022. "CO2 hydrate stability in oceanic sediments under brine conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    16. Wang, Xiao & van ’t Veld, Klaas & Marcy, Peter & Huzurbazar, Snehalata & Alvarado, Vladimir, 2018. "Economic co-optimization of oil recovery and CO2 sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 132-147.
    17. Cui, Guodong & Pei, Shufeng & Rui, Zhenhua & Dou, Bin & Ning, Fulong & Wang, Jiaqiang, 2021. "Whole process analysis of geothermal exploitation and power generation from a depleted high-temperature gas reservoir by recycling CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    18. Alirza Orujov & Kipp Coddington & Saman A. Aryana, 2023. "A Review of CCUS in the Context of Foams, Regulatory Frameworks and Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-41, April.
    19. Ali Goudarzi & Seyyed A. Hosseini & Diana Sava & Jean†Philippe Nicot, 2018. "Simulation and 4D seismic studies of pressure management and CO2 plume control by means of brine extraction and monitoring at the Devine Test Site, South Texas, USA," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 185-204, February.
    20. Aaditya Khanal & Md Fahim Shahriar, 2022. "Physics-Based Proxy Modeling of CO 2 Sequestration in Deep Saline Aquifers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:222:y:2021:i:c:s036054422100164x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.