IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v304y2021ics030626192101103x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stochastic multi-interval scheduling framework to quantify operational flexibility in low carbon power systems

Author

Listed:
  • Yamujala, Sumanth
  • Kushwaha, Priyanka
  • Jain, Anjali
  • Bhakar, Rohit
  • Wu, Jianzhong
  • Mathur, Jyotirmay

Abstract

Operational flexibility is required in power systems to mitigate load-generation imbalances. Inflexibility either results in infeasible scheduling or shift resources from their economic operating point. System operators must estimate flexibility requirement, assess its availability from committed resources, and take corrective measures to handle upcoming inflexibility events. Various metrics are integrated with economic dispatch to quantify different facets of flexibility — ramp, power, and energy. Consideration of all three facets is essential for its adequate assessment, but is often neglected in literature and requires an in-depth investigation. Further, existing literature hardly consider resources’ day-ahead scheduling decisions while evaluating flexibility for real-time operations. This results in erratic assessment of available flexibility. In this context, the paper proposes a comprehensive metric to quantify flexibility in terms of ramp, power, and energy insufficiency by simultaneously considering their system-wide requirement and availability. A Resource Flexibility Index based on operating range and ramping capability of resources is proposed for accurate indication of available flexibility. The proposed metric is integrated with real-time stochastic multi-interval scheduling framework that considers day-ahead operational constraints. Netload forecast and associated uncertainty are characterized using Long Short-Term Memory and Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. Results highlight that the flexibility index is proportional to system’s netload variability handling capability and average inflexibility can be reduced up to 97% with the utilization of emerging resources and ramp products. The proposed tools are of value to power system planners and operators to manage netload intermittency.

Suggested Citation

  • Yamujala, Sumanth & Kushwaha, Priyanka & Jain, Anjali & Bhakar, Rohit & Wu, Jianzhong & Mathur, Jyotirmay, 2021. "A stochastic multi-interval scheduling framework to quantify operational flexibility in low carbon power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:304:y:2021:i:c:s030626192101103x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192101103X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z., 2016. "A composite metric for assessing flexibility available in conventional generators of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 683-691.
    2. Abdin, Islam F. & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "An integrated framework for operational flexibility assessment in multi-period power system planning with renewable energy production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 898-914.
    3. Huber, Matthias & Dimkova, Desislava & Hamacher, Thomas, 2014. "Integration of wind and solar power in Europe: Assessment of flexibility requirements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 236-246.
    4. Söder, Lennart & Tómasson, Egill & Estanqueiro, Ana & Flynn, Damian & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & Kiviluoma, Juha & Korpås, Magnus & Neau, Emmanuel & Couto, António & Pudjianto, Danny & Strbac, Goran & Burke, 2020. "Review of wind generation within adequacy calculations and capacity markets for different power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Heggarty, Thomas & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, Georges, 2020. "Quantifying power system flexibility provision," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    6. Heggarty, Thomas & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, Georges, 2019. "Multi-temporal assessment of power system flexibility requirement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1327-1336.
    7. Agbonaye, Osaru & Keatley, Patrick & Huang, Ye & Ademulegun, Oluwasola O. & Hewitt, Neil, 2021. "Mapping demand flexibility: A spatio-temporal assessment of flexibility needs, opportunities and response potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    8. Wang, Qin & Wu, Hongyu & Florita, Anthony R. & Brancucci Martinez-Anido, Carlo & Hodge, Bri-Mathias, 2016. "The value of improved wind power forecasting: Grid flexibility quantification, ramp capability analysis, and impacts of electricity market operation timescales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 696-713.
    9. Olsen, Karen Pardos & Zong, Yi & You, Shi & Bindner, Henrik & Koivisto, Matti & Gea-Bermúdez, Juan, 2020. "Multi-timescale data-driven method identifying flexibility requirements for scenarios with high penetration of renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Shida & Ge, Shaoyun & Liu, Hong & Zhao, Bo & Ni, Chouwei & Hou, Guocheng & Wang, Chengshan, 2024. "Region-based flexibility quantification in distribution systems: An analytical approach considering spatio-temporal coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    2. Jin, Xiaoyu & Liu, Benxi & Liao, Shengli & Cheng, Chuntian & Zhang, Yi & Zhao, Zhipeng & Lu, Jia, 2022. "Wasserstein metric-based two-stage distributionally robust optimization model for optimal daily peak shaving dispatch of cascade hydroplants under renewable energy uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Zhang, Gaohang & Li, Fengting & Wang, Sen & Yin, Chunya, 2023. "Robust low-carbon energy and reserve scheduling considering operational risk and flexibility improvement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    4. Li, Binghui & Feng, Cong & Siebenschuh, Carlo & Zhang, Rui & Spyrou, Evangelia & Krishnan, Venkat & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Zhang, Jie, 2022. "Sizing ramping reserve using probabilistic solar forecasts: A data-driven method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    5. Ting, Zhang & Yunna, Wu, 2024. "Collaborative allocation model and balanced interaction strategy of multi flexible resources in the new power system based on Stackelberg game theory," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    6. Ma, Huan & Sun, Qinghan & Chen, Qun & Zhao, Tian & He, Kelun, 2023. "Exergy-based flexibility cost indicator and spatio-temporal coordination principle of distributed multi-energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    7. Sreekumar, Sreenu & Yamujala, Sumanth & Sharma, Kailash Chand & Bhakar, Rohit & Simon, Sishaj P. & Rana, Ankur Singh, 2022. "Flexible Ramp Products: A solution to enhance power system flexibility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heggarty, Thomas & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, Georges, 2020. "Quantifying power system flexibility provision," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Heggarty, Thomas & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, Georges, 2024. "Assessing the relative impacts of maximum investment rate and temporal detail in capacity expansion models applied to power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Thomas Heggarty & Jean-Yves Bourmaud & Robin Girard & Georges Kariniotakis, 2024. "Assessing the relative impacts of maximum investment rate and temporal detail in capacity expansion models applied to power systems," Post-Print hal-04383397, HAL.
    4. Zhao, Mingzhe & Wang, Yimin & Wang, Xuebin & Chang, Jianxia & Chen, Yunhua & Zhou, Yong & Guo, Aijun, 2022. "Flexibility evaluation of wind-PV-hydro multi-energy complementary base considering the compensation ability of cascade hydropower stations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    5. Cany, C. & Mansilla, C. & Mathonnière, G. & da Costa, P., 2018. "Nuclear contribution to the penetration of variable renewable energy sources in a French decarbonised power mix," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 544-555.
    6. Xuejun Li & Jiaxin Qian & Changhai Yang & Boyang Chen & Xiang Wang & Zongnan Jiang, 2024. "New Power System Planning and Evolution Path with Multi-Flexibility Resource Coordination," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z. & Fleming, Peter J., 2019. "A multi-objective framework for long-term generation expansion planning with variable renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    8. McPherson, Madeleine & Karney, Bryan, 2017. "A scenario based approach to designing electricity grids with high variable renewable energy penetrations in Ontario, Canada: Development and application of the SILVER model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 185-196.
    9. Vulic, Natasa & Rüdisüli, Martin & Orehounig, Kristina, 2023. "Evaluating energy flexibility requirements for high shares of variable renewable energy: A heuristic approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    10. Heydarian-Forushani, E. & Golshan, M.E.H. & Siano, Pierluigi, 2017. "Evaluating the benefits of coordinated emerging flexible resources in electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 142-154.
    11. Xiong, Bobby & Predel, Johannes & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud, 2021. "Spatial flexibility in redispatch: Supporting low carbon energy systems with Power-to-Gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Chang-Gi Min & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2017. "Net Load Carrying Capability of Generating Units in Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Flores-Quiroz, Angela & Strunz, Kai, 2021. "A distributed computing framework for multi-stage stochastic planning of renewable power systems with energy storage as flexibility option," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    14. Marta Poncela & Arturs Purvins & Stamatios Chondrogiannis, 2018. "Pan-European Analysis on Power System Flexibility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Huclin, Sébastien & Ramos, Andrés & Chaves, José Pablo & Matanza, Javier & González-Eguino, Mikel, 2023. "A methodological approach for assessing flexibility and capacity value in renewable-dominated power systems: A Spanish case study in 2030," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    16. Heffron, Raphael & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Wagner, Jonathan & Weibelzahl, Martin & Fridgen, Gilbert, 2020. "Industrial demand-side flexibility: A key element of a just energy transition and industrial development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    17. Deng, Xu & Lv, Tao & Xu, Jie & Hou, Xiaoran & Liu, Feng, 2022. "Assessing the integration effect of inter-regional transmission on variable power generation under renewable energy consumption policy in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    18. Sreekumar, Sreenu & Yamujala, Sumanth & Sharma, Kailash Chand & Bhakar, Rohit & Simon, Sishaj P. & Rana, Ankur Singh, 2022. "Flexible Ramp Products: A solution to enhance power system flexibility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Guo, Zheyu & Zheng, Yanan & Li, Gengyin, 2020. "Power system flexibility quantitative evaluation based on improved universal generating function method: A case study of Zhangjiakou," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    20. Saleh Abujarad & Mohd Wazir Mustafa & Jasrul Jamani Jamian & Abdirahman M. Abdilahi & Jeroen D. M. De Kooning & Jan Desmet & Lieven Vandevelde, 2020. "An Adjusted Weight Metric to Quantify Flexibility Available in Conventional Generators for Low Carbon Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:304:y:2021:i:c:s030626192101103x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.