IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v285y2021ics0306261921000234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel machine learning-based optimization algorithm (ActivO) for accelerating simulation-driven engine design

Author

Listed:
  • Owoyele, Opeoluwa
  • Pal, Pinaki

Abstract

A novel design optimization approach (ActivO) that employs an ensemble of machine learning algorithms is presented. The proposed approach is a surrogate-based scheme, where the predictions of a weak leaner and a strong learner are utilized within an active learning loop. The weak learner is used to identify promising regions within the design space to explore, while the strong learner is used to determine the exact location of the optimum within promising regions. For each design iteration, exploration is done by randomly selecting evaluation points within regions where the weak learner-predicted fitness is high. The global optimum obtained by using the strong learner as a surrogate is also evaluated to enable rapid convergence once the most promising region has been identified. First, the performance of ActivO was compared against five other optimizers on a cosine mixture function with 25 local optima and one global optimum. In the second problem, the objective was to minimize indicated specific fuel consumption of a compression-ignition internal combustion (IC) engine while adhering to desired constraints associated with in-cylinder pressure and emissions. Here, the efficacy of the proposed approach is compared to that of a genetic algorithm, which is widely used within the internal combustion engine community for engine optimization, showing that ActivO reduces the number of function evaluations needed to reach the global optimum, and thereby time-to-design by 80%. Furthermore, the optimization of engine design parameters leads to savings of around 1.9% in energy consumption, while maintaining operability and acceptable pollutant emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Owoyele, Opeoluwa & Pal, Pinaki, 2021. "A novel machine learning-based optimization algorithm (ActivO) for accelerating simulation-driven engine design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:285:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921000234
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921000234
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mebane Jr., Walter R. & Sekhon, Jasjeet S., 2011. "Genetic Optimization Using Derivatives: The rgenoud Package for R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 42(i11).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad, Tanveer & Madonski, Rafal & Zhang, Dongdong & Huang, Chao & Mujeeb, Asad, 2022. "Data-driven probabilistic machine learning in sustainable smart energy/smart energy systems: Key developments, challenges, and future research opportunities in the context of smart grid paradigm," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Liyue Wang & Haochen Zhang & Cong Wang & Jun Tao & Xinyue Lan & Gang Sun & Jinzhang Feng, 2024. "A Review of Intelligent Airfoil Aerodynamic Optimization Methods Based on Data-Driven Advanced Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    2. Jasjeet Singh Sekhon & Richard D. Grieve, 2012. "A matching method for improving covariate balance in cost‐effectiveness analyses," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(6), pages 695-714, June.
    3. Scrucca, Luca, 2013. "GA: A Package for Genetic Algorithms in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 53(i04).
    4. Pates, Nicholas J. & Kim, GwanSeon & Mark, Tyler B. & Ritter, Matthias, 2020. "Windfalls or wind falls? The Local Effects of Turbine Development on US Agricultural Land Values," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304611, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Georgalos, Konstantinos & Paya, Ivan & Peel, David A., 2021. "On the contribution of the Markowitz model of utility to explain risky choice in experimental research," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 527-543.
    6. Baqun Zhang & Min Zhang, 2018. "C‐learning: A new classification framework to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 891-899, September.
    7. Chaeryon Kang & Holly Janes & Ying Huang, 2014. "Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 695-707, September.
    8. Carl Müller-Crepon & Philipp Hunziker, 2018. "New spatial data on ethnicity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(5), pages 687-698, September.
    9. Isabelle Salle & Marc-Alexandre Sénégas & Murat Yıldızoğlu, 2019. "How transparent about its inflation target should a central bank be?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 391-427, March.
    10. Chevalier, Clément & Picheny, Victor & Ginsbourger, David, 2014. "KrigInv: An efficient and user-friendly implementation of batch-sequential inversion strategies based on kriging," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1021-1034.
    11. Adeola Oyenubi & Martin Wittenberg, 2021. "Does the choice of balance-measure matter under genetic matching?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 489-502, July.
    12. Isabelle SALLE & Marc-Alexandre SENEGAS & Murat YILDIZOGLU, 2013. "How Transparent About Its Inflation Target Should a Central Bank be? An Agent-Based Model Assessment," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2013-24, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    13. Pan Zhao & Yifan Cui, 2023. "A Semiparametric Instrumented Difference-in-Differences Approach to Policy Learning," Papers 2310.09545, arXiv.org.
    14. Park, Jungyeon & Alvarenga, Estêvão & Jeon, Jooyoung & Li, Ran & Petropoulos, Fotios & Kim, Hokyun & Ahn, Kwangwon, 2024. "Probabilistic forecast-based portfolio optimization of electricity demand at low aggregation levels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    15. repec:jss:jstsof:42:i04 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Isabelle Salle & Murat Yıldızoğlu, 2014. "Efficient Sampling and Meta-Modeling for Computational Economic Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 44(4), pages 507-536, December.
    17. Runchao Jiang & Wenbin Lu & Rui Song & Marie Davidian, 2017. "On estimation of optimal treatment regimes for maximizing t-year survival probability," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(4), pages 1165-1185, September.
    18. Henningsen, Arne & Mpeta, Daniel F. & Adem, Anwar S. & Kuzilwa, Joseph A. & Czekaj, Tomasz G., 2015. "A Meta-Frontier Approach for Causal Inference in Productivity Analysis: The Effect of Contract Farming on Sunflower Productivity in Tanzania," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 206200, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Kirill V. Rostislav & Yury Yu. Ponomarev & Darya M. Radchenko, 2022. "Simulated Spatial Model of Russian Urban Development [Имитационная Пространственная Модель Развития Российских Городов]," Russian Economic Development, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 5, pages 20-33, May.
    20. Croonenbroeck, Carsten & Hennecke, David, 2021. "A comparison of optimizers in a unified standard for optimization on wind farm layout optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    21. Baqun Zhang & Anastasios A. Tsiatis & Eric B. Laber & Marie Davidian, 2012. "A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1010-1018, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:285:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921000234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.