IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v253y2019ic16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling and evaluation of groundwater filled boreholes subjected to natural convection

Author

Listed:
  • Johnsson, Josef
  • Adl-Zarrabi, Bijan

Abstract

One of the challenges of designing ground source heat pumps systems is the calculation of the effective thermal borehole resistance which affects the heat extraction rate and thereby the required length of the borehole. Calculating effective borehole resistance is especially demanding when the boreholes are filled with groundwater. The natural convection in the groundwater affects the heat transport from the borehole heat exchanger to the borehole wall. The objective of this paper is to present the results of the modified Pygfunction software in which recently developed correlations for calculating influence of the natural convection in boreholes has been incorporated. The calculated results were validated by using results of thermal response test (TRT) from four adjacent groundwater filled borehole in the central parts of Sweden. The numerical results reveal that the original and unmodified Pygfunction can be used for accurate calculation of fluid temperatures in borehole heat exchangers by using an effective thermal conductivity of the filling material. However, that requires access to thermal response test data. The modified software calculates the effective borehole resistance with a deviation of about 15–30% compared to the effective borehole resistance from TRT. This deviation is an improvement compared with the standard assumption of neglecting natural convection in boreholes. However, for large installations with more than 4000 m of borehole heat exchangers a thermal response test is still recommended in order to ensure a more correct sizing of geothermal system.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnsson, Josef & Adl-Zarrabi, Bijan, 2019. "Modelling and evaluation of groundwater filled boreholes subjected to natural convection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:253:y:2019:i:c:16
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919312292
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113555?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choi, Jung Chan & Park, Joonsang & Lee, Seung Rae, 2013. "Numerical evaluation of the effects of groundwater flow on borehole heat exchanger arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 230-240.
    2. Spitler, Jeffrey D. & Javed, Saqib & Ramstad, Randi Kalskin, 2016. "Natural convection in groundwater-filled boreholes used as ground heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 352-365.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cardoso de Freitas Murari, Milena & de Hollanda Cavalcanti Tsuha, Cristina & Loveridge, Fleur, 2022. "Investigation on the thermal response of steel pipe energy piles with different backfill materials," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 44-61.
    2. Anjan Rao Puttige & Staffan Andersson & Ronny Östin & Thomas Olofsson, 2020. "A Novel Analytical-ANN Hybrid Model for Borehole Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Xu, Huining & Shi, Hao & Tan, Yiqiu & Ye, Qing & Liu, Xiujie, 2022. "Modeling and assessment of operation economic benefits for hydronic snow melting pavement system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    4. Ignacio Martín Nieto & Cristina Sáez Blázquez & Arturo Farfán Martín & Diego González-Aguilera, 2020. "Analysis of the Influence of Reducing the Duration of a Thermal Response Test in a Water-Filled Geothermal Borehole Located in Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Johnsson, Josef & Adl-Zarrabi, Bijan, 2020. "A numerical and experimental study of a pavement solar collector for the northern hemisphere," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Zhao, Zilong & Lin, Yu-Feng & Stumpf, Andrew & Wang, Xinlei, 2022. "Assessing impacts of groundwater on geothermal heat exchangers: A review of methodology and modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 121-147.
    7. Oleg Todorov & Kari Alanne & Markku Virtanen & Risto Kosonen, 2021. "Different Approaches for Evaluation and Modeling of the Effective Thermal Resistance of Groundwater-Filled Boreholes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javadi, Hossein & Mousavi Ajarostaghi, Seyed Soheil & Rosen, Marc A. & Pourfallah, Mohsen, 2019. "Performance of ground heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of recent advances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 207-233.
    2. Zhao, Zilong & Lin, Yu-Feng & Stumpf, Andrew & Wang, Xinlei, 2022. "Assessing impacts of groundwater on geothermal heat exchangers: A review of methodology and modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 121-147.
    3. Ravi Shanker, Ganesh & Homan, K.O., 2022. "Convective transport from geothermal borehole heat exchangers embedded in a fluid-saturated porous medium," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 328-342.
    4. Sadeghi, Habibollah & Jalali, Ramin & Singh, Rao Martand, 2024. "A review of borehole thermal energy storage and its integration into district heating systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Choi, Wonjun & Ooka, Ryozo, 2016. "Effect of natural convection on thermal response test conducted in saturated porous formation: Comparison of gravel-backfilled and cement-grouted borehole heat exchangers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 891-903.
    6. Rivera, Jaime A. & Blum, Philipp & Bayer, Peter, 2015. "Ground energy balance for borehole heat exchangers: Vertical fluxes, groundwater and storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1341-1351.
    7. Ana Vieira & Maria Alberdi-Pagola & Paul Christodoulides & Saqib Javed & Fleur Loveridge & Frederic Nguyen & Francesco Cecinato & João Maranha & Georgios Florides & Iulia Prodan & Gust Van Lysebetten , 2017. "Characterisation of Ground Thermal and Thermo-Mechanical Behaviour for Shallow Geothermal Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-51, December.
    8. Tye-Gingras, Maxime & Gosselin, Louis, 2014. "Generic ground response functions for ground exchangers in the presence of groundwater flow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 354-366.
    9. Choi, Wonjun & Kikumoto, Hideki & Choudhary, Ruchi & Ooka, Ryozo, 2018. "Bayesian inference for thermal response test parameter estimation and uncertainty assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 306-321.
    10. Li, Biao & Han, Zongwei & Bai, Chenguang & Hu, Honghao, 2019. "The influence of soil thermal properties on the operation performance on ground source heat pump system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 903-913.
    11. Wilke, Sascha & Menberg, Kathrin & Steger, Hagen & Blum, Philipp, 2020. "Advanced thermal response tests: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    12. Somogyi, Viola & Sebestyén, Viktor & Nagy, Georgina, 2017. "Scientific achievements and regulation of shallow geothermal systems in six European countries – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 934-952.
    13. Go, Gyu-Hyun & Lee, Seung-Rae & Yoon, Seok & Kang, Han-byul, 2014. "Design of spiral coil PHC energy pile considering effective borehole thermal resistance and groundwater advection effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 165-178.
    14. Linlin Zhang & Zhonghua Shi & Tianhao Yuan, 2020. "Study on the Coupled Heat Transfer Model Based on Groundwater Advection and Axial Heat Conduction for the Double U-Tube Vertical Borehole Heat Exchanger," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Tang, Fujiao & Nowamooz, Hossein, 2019. "Sensitive analysis on the effective soil thermal conductivity of the Thermal Response Test considering various testing times, field conditions and U-pipe lengths," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1732-1743.
    16. Javed, Saqib & Spitler, Jeffrey, 2017. "Accuracy of borehole thermal resistance calculation methods for grouted single U-tube ground heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 790-806.
    17. Jin Luo & Joachim Rohn & Manfred Bayer & Anna Priess, 2013. "Thermal Efficiency Comparison of Borehole Heat Exchangers with Different Drillhole Diameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Pokhrel, Sajjan & Sasmito, Agus P. & Sainoki, Atsushi & Tosha, Toshiyuki & Tanaka, Tatsuya & Nagai, Chiaki & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Field-scale experimental and numerical analysis of a downhole coaxial heat exchanger for geothermal energy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 521-535.
    19. Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P. & Efthymiou, Loukia & Michopoulos, Apostolos & Mavragani, Amaryllis & Anđelković, Aleksandar S. & Antolini, Francesco & Bacic, Mario & Bajare, Diana & Baralis, Matteo & Bog, 2020. "A review of the legal framework in shallow geothermal energy in selected European countries: Need for guidelines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P2), pages 2556-2571.
    20. Arghand, Taha & Javed, Saqib & Trüschel, Anders & Dalenbäck, Jan-Olof, 2021. "Cooling of office buildings in cold climates using direct ground-coupled active chilled beams," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 122-132.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:253:y:2019:i:c:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.