IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v252y2019ic20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electricity wholesale market equilibrium analysis integrating individual risk-averse features of generation companies

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Hongye
  • Chen, Qixin
  • Xia, Qing
  • Kang, Chongqing

Abstract

With the deregulation of world power markets, the importance of power market equilibrium analysis tools becomes more prominent. Due to the increasing uncertainty in the power markets, the influences of risk attitudes on the participants’ strategic bidding behaviors and market equilibrium become more significant, which makes risk feature formulation more necessary in the market bidding decision-making process. This paper fully considers the risk-averse features of power generation companies based on the concept of the conditional value at risk and proposes a bilevel equilibrium model to practically simulate market behaviors. The mathematical model is essentially a modified equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints. The upper-level problem of the model maximizes the profits minus the risks of each generation company, while the lower-level problem represents the market clearing processes of day-ahead markets by the independent system operator. A linearization method is proposed to transform the proposed model into a mixed-integer linear model. An illustrative example and a numerical example are performed to show the effectiveness, validity and adaptability of the proposed model. The comparisons with other equilibrium models demonstrate the better performances of the proposed method to simulate the market equilibrium with several oligopolies. The sensitivity analysis is proposed to analyze the phenomenon where different risk-averse levels and market ownership structures would result in different market equilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Hongye & Chen, Qixin & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2019. "Electricity wholesale market equilibrium analysis integrating individual risk-averse features of generation companies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:252:y:2019:i:c:20
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919311171
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113443?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheikhahmadi, P. & Bahramara, S. & Moshtagh, J. & Yazdani Damavandi, M., 2018. "A risk-based approach for modeling the strategic behavior of a distribution company in wholesale energy market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 24-38.
    2. RUIZ, Carlos & CONEJO, Antonio J. & SMEERS, Yves, 2012. "Equilibria in an oligopolistic electricity pool with stepwise offer curves," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2395, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Pozo, David & Sauma, Enzo & Contreras, Javier, 2017. "When doing nothing may be the best investment action: Pessimistic anticipative power transmission planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 383-398.
    4. Xinmin Hu & Daniel Ralph, 2007. "Using EPECs to Model Bilevel Games in Restructured Electricity Markets with Locational Prices," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 809-827, October.
    5. Tajeddini, Mohammad Amin & Rahimi-Kian, Ashkan & Soroudi, Alireza, 2014. "Risk averse optimal operation of a virtual power plant using two stage stochastic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 958-967.
    6. David Pozo & Enzo Sauma & Javier Contreras, 2017. "Basic theoretical foundations and insights on bilevel models and their applications to power systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 303-334, July.
    7. Antonio J. Conejo & Miguel Carrión & Juan M. Morales, 2010. "Decision Making Under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-1-4419-7421-1, April.
    8. Bahrami, Shahab & Amini, M. Hadi, 2018. "A decentralized trading algorithm for an electricity market with generation uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 520-532.
    9. Esmaeili Aliabadi, Danial & Kaya, Murat & Sahin, Guvenc, 2017. "Competition, risk and learning in electricity markets: An agent-based simulation study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1000-1011.
    10. Yıldıran, Uğur & Kayahan, İsmail, 2018. "Risk-averse stochastic model predictive control-based real-time operation method for a wind energy generation system supported by a pumped hydro storage unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 631-643.
    11. Shabanzadeh, Morteza & Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad-Kazem & Haghifam, Mahmoud-Reza, 2017. "An interactive cooperation model for neighboring virtual power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 273-289.
    12. Zou, Peng & Chen, Qixin & Xia, Qing & He, Guannan & Kang, Chongqing & Conejo, Antonio J., 2016. "Pool equilibria including strategic storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 260-270.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao, Xiangsheng & Wang, JianXiao & Hill, David J., 2022. "Impact of Large-scale concentrated solar power on energy and auxiliary markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    2. Hong, Qiuyi & Meng, Fanlin & Liu, Jian & Bo, Rui, 2023. "A bilevel game-theoretic decision-making framework for strategic retailers in both local and wholesale electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PA).
    3. Meng, Ming & Pang, Tingting & Li, Xinxin & Niu, Yi, 2024. "Production decision analysis of China's fossil fuel power enterprises in dual market conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    4. Devine, Mel T. & Siddiqui, Sauleh, 2023. "Strategic investment decisions in an oligopoly with a competitive fringe: An equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1473-1494.
    5. Chen Zhao & Jiaqi Sun & Ping He & Shaohua Zhang & Yuqi Ji, 2023. "Integrating Risk Preferences into Game Analysis of Price-Making Retailers in Power Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Fan, Zhi-Ping & Cai, Siqin & Guo, Dongliang & Xu, Bo, 2022. "Facing the uncertainty of renewable energy production: Production decisions of a power plant with different risk attitudes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1237-1247.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christos N. Dimitriadis & Evangelos G. Tsimopoulos & Michael C. Georgiadis, 2021. "A Review on the Complementarity Modelling in Competitive Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    2. David Pozo & Enzo Sauma & Javier Contreras, 2017. "Basic theoretical foundations and insights on bilevel models and their applications to power systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 303-334, July.
    3. Guo, Hongye & Chen, Qixin & Zhang, Yan & Liu, Kai & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2020. "Constraining the oligopoly manipulation in electricity market: A vertical integration perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. Farrokhifar, Meisam & Nie, Yinghui & Pozo, David, 2020. "Energy systems planning: A survey on models for integrated power and natural gas networks coordination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. Devine, Mel T. & Siddiqui, Sauleh, 2023. "Strategic investment decisions in an oligopoly with a competitive fringe: An equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1473-1494.
    6. Bahramara, Salah & Sheikhahmadi, Pouria & Golpîra, Hêmin, 2019. "Co-optimization of energy and reserve in standalone micro-grid considering uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 792-804.
    7. Kasina, Saamrat & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2020. "The value of cooperation in interregional transmission planning: A noncooperative equilibrium model approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 740-752.
    8. Yu, Songyuan & Fang, Fang & Liu, Yajuan & Liu, Jizhen, 2019. "Uncertainties of virtual power plant: Problems and countermeasures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 454-470.
    9. Huppmann, Daniel & Egerer, Jonas, 2015. "National-strategic investment in European power transmission capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 191-203.
    10. Alexander Zerrahn & Daniel Huppmann, 2014. "Network Expansion to Mitigate Market Power: How Increased Integration Fosters Welfare," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1380, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Naval, Natalia & Yusta, Jose M., 2021. "Virtual power plant models and electricity markets - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Crespo-Vazquez, Jose L. & Carrillo, C. & Diaz-Dorado, E. & Martinez-Lorenzo, Jose A. & Noor-E-Alam, Md., 2018. "A machine learning based stochastic optimization framework for a wind and storage power plant participating in energy pool market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 341-357.
    13. Turk, Ana & Wu, Qiuwei & Zhang, Menglin & Østergaard, Jacob, 2020. "Day-ahead stochastic scheduling of integrated multi-energy system for flexibility synergy and uncertainty balancing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    14. Natalia Naval & Jose M. Yusta, 2020. "Water-Energy Management for Demand Charges and Energy Cost Optimization of a Pumping Stations System under a Renewable Virtual Power Plant Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Lak, Omidreza & Rastegar, Mohammad & Mohammadi, Mohammad & Shafiee, Soroush & Zareipour, Hamidreza, 2021. "Risk-constrained stochastic market operation strategies for wind power producers and energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    16. Amit Kumer Podder & Sayemul Islam & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Aneesh A. Chand & Pulivarthi Nageswara Rao & Kushal A. Prasad & T. Logeswaran & Kabir A. Mamun, 2020. "Systematic Categorization of Optimization Strategies for Virtual Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-46, November.
    17. Shahmohammadi, Ali & Sioshansi, Ramteen & Conejo, Antonio J. & Afsharnia, Saeed, 2018. "Market equilibria and interactions between strategic generation, wind, and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 876-892.
    18. Martin Weibelzahl & Alexandra Märtz, 2020. "Optimal storage and transmission investments in a bilevel electricity market model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(2), pages 911-940, April.
    19. Paul Neetzow & Roman Mendelevitch & Sauleh Siddiqui, 2018. "Modeling Coordination between Renewables and Grid: Policies to Mitigate Distribution Grid Constraints Using Residential PV-Battery Systems," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1766, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    20. Gonzalez-Romero, Isaac-Camilo & Wogrin, Sonja & Gomez, Tomas, 2021. "Transmission and storage expansion planning under imperfect market competition: Social planner versus merchant investor," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:252:y:2019:i:c:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.