IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v231y2018icp854-865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of price-taker and production cost models for determining system value, revenue, and scheduling of concentrating solar power plants

Author

Listed:
  • Martinek, Janna
  • Jorgenson, Jennie
  • Mehos, Mark
  • Denholm, Paul

Abstract

Concentrating solar power (CSP) plants convert solar energy into electricity and can be coupled with low-cost thermal energy storage to provide a dispatchable renewable resource. Maximizing the economic benefits of CSP systems requires deliberate selection of the timing of thermal energy dispatch to coincide with high-price or high-value periods. The performance and value of CSP systems have traditionally been evaluated using two distinct approaches: (1) production cost models (PCMs), which optimize commitment and dispatch schedules for an entire fleet of generators to minimize the cost of satisfying electricity demand; and (2) price-taker (PT) models, which optimize dispatch of the CSP system against historical or forecasted electricity prices to maximize revenue available to the CSP operator. The PCM approach is, in principle, superior because of the ability to capture system-level details such as transmission pathways and associated constraints, and feedback between CSP dispatch schedules and operation of other generators. The computationally simpler PT technique cannot explicitly address these concerns, but the comparative reduction in solution time is attractive for sensitivity analysis and rigorous optimization of CSP plant design and operation. In this work, we directly compare the dispatch profiles, net revenue, and operational value of CSP systems using implementations of each technique to assess how closely the solutions from the PT technique can approach those from the PCM for a specific market scenario. The PT implementation produced characteristically similar dispatch profiles as the PCM for both a large solar-multiple configuration and a small solar-multiple peaking configuration, while requiring only 1% of the computational time of the PCM. In addition, dispatching the CSP plant according to the self-scheduled PT solution—as opposed to the system-optimized PCM solution—only reduced the total CSP operational value by 1–5%, with consistent trends across CSP configurations and locations. This analysis validates the ability of the PT approach to substantially capture the economic benefits of CSP systems when pricing profiles are available, and indicates that the PT approach is suitable for initial design and optimization of CSP technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Martinek, Janna & Jorgenson, Jennie & Mehos, Mark & Denholm, Paul, 2018. "A comparison of price-taker and production cost models for determining system value, revenue, and scheduling of concentrating solar power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 854-865.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:231:y:2018:i:c:p:854-865
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918314478
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abujarad, Saleh Y. & Mustafa, M.W. & Jamian, J.J., 2017. "Recent approaches of unit commitment in the presence of intermittent renewable energy resources: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 215-223.
    2. Vasallo, Manuel Jesús & Bravo, José Manuel, 2016. "A MPC approach for optimal generation scheduling in CSP plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 357-370.
    3. Brand, Bernhard & Boudghene Stambouli, Amine & Zejli, Driss, 2012. "The value of dispatchability of CSP plants in the electricity systems of Morocco and Algeria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 321-331.
    4. Pousinho, H.M.I. & Silva, H. & Mendes, V.M.F. & Collares-Pereira, M. & Pereira Cabrita, C., 2014. "Self-scheduling for energy and spinning reserve of wind/CSP plants by a MILP approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 524-534.
    5. Lizarraga-Garcia, Enrique & Ghobeity, Amin & Totten, Mark & Mitsos, Alexander, 2013. "Optimal operation of a solar-thermal power plant with energy storage and electricity buy-back from grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 61-70.
    6. Kost, Christoph & Flath, Christoph M. & Möst, Dominik, 2013. "Concentrating solar power plant investment and operation decisions under different price and support mechanisms," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 238-248.
    7. Wagner, Michael J. & Newman, Alexandra M. & Hamilton, William T. & Braun, Robert J., 2017. "Optimized dispatch in a first-principles concentrating solar power production model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 959-971.
    8. McPherson, Madeleine & Tahseen, Samiha, 2018. "Deploying storage assets to facilitate variable renewable energy integration: The impacts of grid flexibility, renewable penetration, and market structure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 856-870.
    9. Dominguez, R. & Baringo, L. & Conejo, A.J., 2012. "Optimal offering strategy for a concentrating solar power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 316-325.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Murphy, C.A. & Schleifer, A. & Eurek, K., 2021. "A taxonomy of systems that combine utility-scale renewable energy and energy storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Castillejo-Cuberos, A. & Cardemil, J.M. & Escobar, R., 2023. "Techno-economic assessment of photovoltaic plants considering high temporal resolution and non-linear dynamics of battery storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    3. DiOrio, Nicholas & Denholm, Paul & Hobbs, William B., 2020. "A model for evaluating the configuration and dispatch of PV plus battery power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. Fang, Yuchen & Zhao, Shuqiang, 2020. "Look-ahead bidding strategy for concentrating solar power plants with wind farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    5. Abiodun, Kehinde & Hood, Karoline & Cox, John L. & Newman, Alexandra M. & Zolan, Alex J., 2023. "The value of concentrating solar power in ancillary services markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    6. Vasallo, Manuel Jesús & Cojocaru, Emilian Gelu & Gegúndez, Manuel Emilio & Marín, Diego, 2021. "Application of data-based solar field models to optimal generation scheduling in concentrating solar power plants," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1130-1149.
    7. Harrison-Atlas, Dylan & Murphy, Caitlin & Schleifer, Anna & Grue, Nicholas, 2022. "Temporal complementarity and value of wind-PV hybrid systems across the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 111-123.
    8. Gao, Xian & Knueven, Bernard & Siirola, John D. & Miller, David C. & Dowling, Alexander W., 2022. "Multiscale simulation of integrated energy system and electricity market interactions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    9. Ikechi Emmanuel, Michael & Denholm, Paul, 2022. "A market feedback framework for improved estimates of the arbitrage value of energy storage using price-taker models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    10. Feng, Chenjia & Shao, Chengcheng & Wang, Xifan, 2021. "CSP clustering in unit commitment for power system production cost modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1217-1228.
    11. Jiawen Bai & Tao Ding & Zhe Wang & Jianhua Chen, 2019. "Day-Ahead Robust Economic Dispatch Considering Renewable Energy and Concentrated Solar Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Shahid Ali & Qingyou Yan & Muhammad Sajjad Hussain & Muhammad Irfan & Munir Ahmad & Asif Razzaq & Vishal Dagar & Cem Işık, 2021. "Evaluating Green Technology Strategies for the Sustainable Development of Solar Power Projects: Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, November.
    13. Coronas, Sergio & Martín, Helena & de la Hoz, Jordi & García de Vicuña, Luis & Castilla, Miguel, 2021. "MONTE-CARLO probabilistic valuation of concentrated solar power systems in Spain under the 2014 retroactive regulatory framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    14. Kahvecioğlu, Gökçe & Morton, David P. & Wagner, Michael J., 2022. "Dispatch optimization of a concentrating solar power system under uncertain solar irradiance and energy prices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    15. Jalving, Jordan & Ghouse, Jaffer & Cortes, Nicole & Gao, Xian & Knueven, Bernard & Agi, Damian & Martin, Shawn & Chen, Xinhe & Guittet, Darice & Tumbalam-Gooty, Radhakrishna & Bianchi, Ludovico & Beat, 2023. "Beyond price taker: Conceptual design and optimization of integrated energy systems using machine learning market surrogates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cojocaru, Emilian Gelu & Bravo, José Manuel & Vasallo, Manuel Jesús & Santos, Diego Marín, 2019. "Optimal scheduling in concentrating solar power plants oriented to low generation cycling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 789-799.
    2. Vasallo, Manuel Jesús & Cojocaru, Emilian Gelu & Gegúndez, Manuel Emilio & Marín, Diego, 2021. "Application of data-based solar field models to optimal generation scheduling in concentrating solar power plants," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1130-1149.
    3. Hoz, Jordi de la & Martín, Helena & Montalà, Montserrat & Matas, José & Guzman, Ramon, 2018. "Assessing the 2014 retroactive regulatory framework applied to the concentrating solar power systems in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1377-1399.
    4. Abiodun, Kehinde & Hood, Karoline & Cox, John L. & Newman, Alexandra M. & Zolan, Alex J., 2023. "The value of concentrating solar power in ancillary services markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    5. McPherson, Madeleine & Mehos, Mark & Denholm, Paul, 2020. "Leveraging concentrating solar power plant dispatchability: A review of the impacts of global market structures and policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Vasallo, Manuel Jesús & Bravo, José Manuel, 2016. "A MPC approach for optimal generation scheduling in CSP plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 357-370.
    7. Kahvecioğlu, Gökçe & Morton, David P. & Wagner, Michael J., 2022. "Dispatch optimization of a concentrating solar power system under uncertain solar irradiance and energy prices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    8. Xianhua Gao & Shangshang Wei & Chunlin Xia & Yiguo Li, 2022. "Flexible Operation of Concentrating Solar Power Plant with Thermal Energy Storage Based on a Coordinated Control Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Dowling, Alexander W. & Zheng, Tian & Zavala, Victor M., 2017. "Economic assessment of concentrated solar power technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1019-1032.
    10. Du, Ershun & Zhang, Ning & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & Kang, Chongqing & Kroposki, Benjamin & Xia, Qing, 2018. "Economic justification of concentrating solar power in high renewable energy penetrated power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 649-661.
    11. Wang, Anming & Liu, Jiping & Zhang, Shunqi & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Steam generation system operation optimization in parabolic trough concentrating solar power plants under cloudy conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    12. Mahmoudimehr, Javad & Sebghati, Parvin, 2019. "A novel multi-objective Dynamic Programming optimization method: Performance management of a solar thermal power plant as a case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 796-814.
    13. Dowling, Alexander W. & Kumar, Ranjeet & Zavala, Victor M., 2017. "A multi-scale optimization framework for electricity market participation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 147-164.
    14. Kost, Christoph & Flath, Christoph M. & Möst, Dominik, 2013. "Concentrating solar power plant investment and operation decisions under different price and support mechanisms," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 238-248.
    15. Xiao, Xiangsheng & Wang, JianXiao & Hill, David J., 2022. "Impact of Large-scale concentrated solar power on energy and auxiliary markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    16. Coronas, Sergio & Martín, Helena & de la Hoz, Jordi & García de Vicuña, Luis & Castilla, Miguel, 2021. "MONTE-CARLO probabilistic valuation of concentrated solar power systems in Spain under the 2014 retroactive regulatory framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Fang, Yuchen & Zhao, Shuqiang, 2020. "Look-ahead bidding strategy for concentrating solar power plants with wind farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Ana Carolina do Amaral Burghi & Tobias Hirsch & Robert Pitz-Paal, 2020. "Artificial Learning Dispatch Planning for Flexible Renewable-Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Ana Carolina do Amaral Burghi & Tobias Hirsch & Robert Pitz-Paal, 2020. "Artificial Learning Dispatch Planning with Probabilistic Forecasts: Using Uncertainties as an Asset," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Joseph Oyekale & Mario Petrollese & Vittorio Tola & Giorgio Cau, 2020. "Impacts of Renewable Energy Resources on Effectiveness of Grid-Integrated Systems: Succinct Review of Current Challenges and Potential Solution Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-48, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:231:y:2018:i:c:p:854-865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.