IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v226y2018icp1037-1055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A numerical and experimental comparison of a single reversible molten carbonate cell operating in fuel cell mode and electrolysis mode

Author

Listed:
  • Perez-Trujillo, Juan Pedro
  • Elizalde-Blancas, Francisco
  • Della Pietra, Massimiliano
  • McPhail, Stephen J.

Abstract

This work summarizes the experimental and numerical activities done in a molten carbonate cell operated in reversible mode using a single cell with an electrodes-electrolyte interface area of 80 cm2. The experimental activity is divided into two sets. Firstly, running the cell only in fuel cell mode in order to compare five electrochemical zero-dimensional models available in literature and choose the one with the smallest deviation with respect to the experimental data, which is applied later in electrolysis mode. The second experimental set is focused on studying the cell working in reversible mode by varying the gas composition entering the fuel electrode and oxygen electrode, the ratio of the flow rate of the oxygen electrode to the fuel electrode and the cell temperature. The results indicate that molten carbonate cells present lower polarization losses in electrolysis mode than in fuel cell mode. According to the parameter variations, a lower cell temperature decreases the performance in both modes; besides, in the fuel electrode the results indicate carbon dioxide reduction apart from the reduction of water; moreover, the oxygen electrode is strongly sensible to the high presence of carbon dioxide that could cause a faster nickel oxide dissolution accelerating the degradation. Throughout the experimental campaign the molten carbonate cell presents a quite high degradation, contrary to previous results of reversible molten carbonate cells carried out using button cells where an improvement was found instead of a degradation. Electrolyte refilling was tried at the end of the second experimental campaign obtaining a significant decrease of internal resistance with a difference of only 20.6% with respect to the initial condition. According to the experimental activity, the fitted model gives a good prediction of the performance in fuel cell mode; however, in electrolysis mode the prediction is weak mainly attributed to the differences in the diffusive phenomena between both operative modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Perez-Trujillo, Juan Pedro & Elizalde-Blancas, Francisco & Della Pietra, Massimiliano & McPhail, Stephen J., 2018. "A numerical and experimental comparison of a single reversible molten carbonate cell operating in fuel cell mode and electrolysis mode," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1037-1055.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:226:y:2018:i:c:p:1037-1055
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918308419
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aneke, Mathew & Wang, Meihong, 2016. "Energy storage technologies and real life applications – A state of the art review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 350-377.
    2. Quadrelli, Roberta & Peterson, Sierra, 2007. "The energy-climate challenge: Recent trends in CO2 emissions from fuel combustion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5938-5952, November.
    3. Campanari, Stefano & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Chiesa, Paolo, 2013. "Using MCFC for high efficiency CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycles: Comparison of internal and external reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 772-783.
    4. Baronci, Andrea & Messina, Giuseppe & McPhail, Stephen J. & Moreno, Angelo, 2015. "Numerical investigation of a MCFC (Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell) system hybridized with a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle and compared with a bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1063-1073.
    5. Zhang, Xiaojin & Bauer, Christian & Mutel, Christopher L. & Volkart, Kathrin, 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment of Power-to-Gas: Approaches, system variations and their environmental implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 326-338.
    6. Mehran, Muhammad Taqi & Yu, Seong-Bin & Lee, Dong-Young & Hong, Jong-Eun & Lee, Seung-Bok & Park, Seok-Joo & Song, Rak-Hyun & Lim, Tak-Hyoung, 2018. "Production of syngas from H2O/CO2 by high-pressure coelectrolysis in tubular solid oxide cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 759-770.
    7. Bensmann, B. & Hanke-Rauschenbach, R. & Müller-Syring, G. & Henel, M. & Sundmacher, K., 2016. "Optimal configuration and pressure levels of electrolyzer plants in context of power-to-gas applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 107-124.
    8. Robinius, Martin & Raje, Tanmay & Nykamp, Stefan & Rott, Tobias & Müller, Martin & Grube, Thomas & Katzenbach, Burkhard & Küppers, Stefan & Stolten, Detlef, 2018. "Power-to-Gas: Electrolyzers as an alternative to network expansion – An example from a distribution system operator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 182-197.
    9. Luo, Yu & Wu, Xiao-yu & Shi, Yixiang & Ghoniem, Ahmed F. & Cai, Ningsheng, 2018. "Exergy analysis of an integrated solid oxide electrolysis cell-methanation reactor for renewable energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 371-383.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pérez-Trujillo, Juan Pedro & Elizalde-Blancas, Francisco & McPhail, Stephen J. & Della Pietra, Massimiliano & Bosio, Barbara, 2020. "Preliminary theoretical and experimental analysis of a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell operating in reversible mode," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    2. Pavel Shuhayeu & Aliaksandr Martsinchyk & Katsiaryna Martsinchyk & Jaroslaw Milewski, 2024. "Investigating PEM Fuel Cells as an Alternative Power Source for Electric UAVs: Modeling, Optimization, and Performance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Riccardo Risso & Lucia Cardona & Maurizio Archetti & Filippo Lossani & Barbara Bosio & Dario Bove, 2023. "A Review of On-Board Carbon Capture and Storage Techniques: Solutions to the 2030 IMO Regulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McDonagh, Shane & O'Shea, Richard & Wall, David M. & Deane, J.P. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2018. "Modelling of a power-to-gas system to predict the levelised cost of energy of an advanced renewable gaseous transport fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 444-456.
    2. Lewandowska-Bernat, Anna & Desideri, Umberto, 2018. "Opportunities of power-to-gas technology in different energy systems architectures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 57-67.
    3. Pantò, Fabiola & Siracusano, Stefania & Briguglio, Nicola & Aricò, Antonino Salvatore, 2020. "Durability of a recombination catalyst-based membrane-electrode assembly for electrolysis operation at high current density," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    4. Xing, Xuetao & Lin, Jin & Song, Yonghua & Hu, Qiang & Zhou, You & Mu, Shujun, 2018. "Optimization of hydrogen yield of a high-temperature electrolysis system with coordinated temperature and feed factors at various loading conditions: A model-based study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 368-385.
    5. Reznicek, Evan P. & Braun, Robert J., 2020. "Reversible solid oxide cell systems for integration with natural gas pipeline and carbon capture infrastructure for grid energy management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. McDonagh, Shane & Deane, Paul & Rajendran, Karthik & Murphy, Jerry D., 2019. "Are electrofuels a sustainable transport fuel? Analysis of the effect of controls on carbon, curtailment, and cost of hydrogen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 716-730.
    7. Eveloy, Valerie, 2019. "Hybridization of solid oxide electrolysis-based power-to-methane with oxyfuel combustion and carbon dioxide utilization for energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 550-571.
    8. Valerie Eveloy & Tesfaldet Gebreegziabher, 2018. "A Review of Projected Power-to-Gas Deployment Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-52, July.
    9. Szoplik, Jolanta & Stelmasińska, Paulina, 2019. "Analysis of gas network storage capacity for alternative fuels in Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 343-353.
    10. McDonagh, Shane & Ahmed, Shorif & Desmond, Cian & Murphy, Jerry D, 2020. "Hydrogen from offshore wind: Investor perspective on the profitability of a hybrid system including for curtailment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    11. Shan, Rui & Reagan, Jeremiah & Castellanos, Sergio & Kurtz, Sarah & Kittner, Noah, 2022. "Evaluating emerging long-duration energy storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    12. Robinius, Martin & Raje, Tanmay & Nykamp, Stefan & Rott, Tobias & Müller, Martin & Grube, Thomas & Katzenbach, Burkhard & Küppers, Stefan & Stolten, Detlef, 2018. "Power-to-Gas: Electrolyzers as an alternative to network expansion – An example from a distribution system operator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 182-197.
    13. Blanco, Herib & Faaij, André, 2018. "A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1049-1086.
    14. dos Santos, Kenia Gabriela & Eckert, Caroline Thaís & De Rossi, Eduardo & Bariccatti, Reinaldo Aparecido & Frigo, Elisandro Pires & Lindino, Cleber Antonio & Alves, Helton José, 2017. "Hydrogen production in the electrolysis of water in Brazil, a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 563-571.
    15. Miguel J. Prieto & Juan Á. Martínez & Rogelio Peón & Lourdes Á. Barcia & Fernando Nuño, 2017. "On the Convenience of Using Simulation Models to Optimize the Control Strategy of Molten-Salt Heat Storage Systems in Solar Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Juangsa, Firman Bagja & Prananto, Lukman Adi & Mufrodi, Zahrul & Budiman, Arief & Oda, Takuya & Aziz, Muhammad, 2018. "Highly energy-efficient combination of dehydrogenation of methylcyclohexane and hydrogen-based power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 31-38.
    17. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    18. Barelli, L. & Bidini, G. & Bonucci, F. & Castellini, L. & Fratini, A. & Gallorini, F. & Zuccari, A., 2019. "Flywheel hybridization to improve battery life in energy storage systems coupled to RES plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 937-950.
    19. Hossein Lotfi & Mohammad Hasan Nikkhah, 2024. "Multi-Objective Profit-Based Unit Commitment with Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Units Using a Modified Optimization Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-29, February.
    20. Liu, Jicheng & Sun, Jiakang & Yuan, Hanying & Su, Yihan & Feng, Shuxian & Lu, Chaoran, 2022. "Behavior analysis of photovoltaic-storage-use value chain game evolution in blockchain environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:226:y:2018:i:c:p:1037-1055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.