IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v211y2018icp582-589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the influence of different experimental systems on measured heterogeneous gasification kinetics

Author

Listed:
  • Stoesser, P.
  • Schneider, C.
  • Kreitzberg, T.
  • Kneer, R.
  • Kolb, T.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to gain further insight into the characteristic behavior of reaction systems for establishment of intrinsic and effective particle gasification kinetics. A wood-derived char was subjected to the carbon dioxide-containing atmospheres of four different reaction systems: a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), a fluidized-bed reactor (FBR), a fixed-bed reactor (FFB) and a drop-tube reactor (DTR). All systems contained the same CO2 partial pressure of 800 mbar at atmospheric pressure. A temperature span from 700 to 1600 °C and residence times from 200 ms to over 8 h were investigated. Reactivities spanning five orders of magnitude were observed. The gasification experiments resulted in the identification of four fundamentally different reaction domains; two were classified as true particle behavior, while the observed reaction rates of the other two domains are mainly dominated by the characteristics of the reaction system applied. The domains were referred to as: chemical control, particle diffusion control, bed diffusion control, and system response control. Within the present work, the occurrence of these reaction domains is discussed in regard to the physical nature of the experiments, and implications towards the measurement of reliable particle kinetics are formulated.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoesser, P. & Schneider, C. & Kreitzberg, T. & Kneer, R. & Kolb, T., 2018. "On the influence of different experimental systems on measured heterogeneous gasification kinetics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 582-589.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:211:y:2018:i:c:p:582-589
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917316124
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Leteng & Strand, Michael, 2013. "Investigation of the intrinsic CO2 gasification kinetics of biomass char at medium to high temperatures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 220-228.
    2. Irfan, Muhammad F. & Usman, Muhammad R. & Kusakabe, K., 2011. "Coal gasification in CO2 atmosphere and its kinetics since 1948: A brief review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 12-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Qing & Gong, Yan & Ding, Lu & Guo, Qinghua & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Yu, Guangsuo, 2021. "Reactivity prediction and mechanism analysis of raw and demineralized coal char gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Li, Jie & Chang, Guozhang & Song, Ke & Hao, Bolun & Wang, Cuiping & Zhang, Jian & Yue, Guangxi & Hu, Shugang, 2023. "Influence of coal bottom ash additives on catalytic reforming of biomass pyrolysis gaseous tar and biochar/steam gasification reactivity," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 434-444.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salem, Ahmed M. & Abd Elbar, Ayman Refat, 2023. "The feasibility and performance of using producer gas as a gasifying medium," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    2. Chaiwatanodom, Paphonwit & Vivanpatarakij, Supawat & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification with CO2 recycle for synthesis gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 10-17.
    3. Lahijani, Pooya & Zainal, Zainal Alimuddin & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman, 2015. "Conversion of the greenhouse gas CO2 to the fuel gas CO via the Boudouard reaction: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 615-632.
    4. Salem, Ahmed M. & Elsherbiny, Khaled, 2022. "Innovative concept for the effect of changing gasifying medium and injection points on syngas quality: Towards higher H2 production, and Free-CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    5. Lopez, Gartzen & Alvarez, Jon & Amutio, Maider & Arregi, Aitor & Bilbao, Javier & Olazar, Martin, 2016. "Assessment of steam gasification kinetics of the char from lignocellulosic biomass in a conical spouted bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 493-501.
    6. Ján Kačur & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdán & Patrik Flegner, 2023. "Investigation of Underground Coal Gasification in Laboratory Conditions: A Review of Recent Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-55, August.
    7. Im-orb, Karittha & Simasatitkul, Lida & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2016. "Techno-economic analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer–Tropsch integrated process with off-gas recirculation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 483-496.
    8. Prabowo, Bayu & Aziz, Muhammad & Umeki, Kentaro & Susanto, Herri & Yan, Mi & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2015. "CO2-recycling biomass gasification system for highly efficient and carbon-negative power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 97-106.
    9. Zhao, Jingyu & Deng, Jun & Wang, Tao & Song, Jiajia & Zhang, Yanni & Shu, Chi-Min & Zeng, Qiang, 2019. "Assessing the effectiveness of a high-temperature-programmed experimental system for simulating the spontaneous combustion properties of bituminous coal through thermokinetic analysis of four oxidatio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 587-596.
    10. Samuel C. Bayham & Andrew Tong & Mandar Kathe & Liang-Shih Fan, 2016. "Chemical looping technology for energy and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 216-241, March.
    11. Ziębik, Andrzej & Malik, Tomasz & Liszka, Marcin, 2015. "Thermodynamic evaluation of CHP (combined heat and power) plants integrated with installations of coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P2), pages 179-188.
    12. Zhang, Huining & Dong, Jianping & Wei, Chao & Cao, Caifang & Zhang, Zuotai, 2022. "Future trend of terminal energy conservation in steelmaking plant: Integration of molten slag heat recovery-combustible gas preparation from waste plastics and CO2 emission reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    13. Anna Trubetskaya, 2022. "Reactivity Effects of Inorganic Content in Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-36, April.
    14. Yao, Xiwen & Liu, Qinghua & Kang, Zijian & An, Zhixing & Zhou, Haodong & Xu, Kaili, 2023. "Quantitative study on thermal conversion behaviours and gas emission properties of biomass in nitrogen and in CO2/N2 mixtures by TGA/DTG and a fixed-bed tube furnace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    15. Hong, Yong C. & Lee, Sang J. & Shin, Dong H. & Kim, Ye J. & Lee, Bong J. & Cho, Seong Y. & Chang, Han S., 2012. "Syngas production from gasification of brown coal in a microwave torch plasma," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 36-40.
    16. Janusz Zdeb & Natalia Howaniec & Adam Smoliński, 2019. "Utilization of Carbon Dioxide in Coal Gasification—An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, January.
    17. Barbara Bielowicz & Jacek Misiak, 2020. "The Impact of Coal’s Petrographic Composition on Its Suitability for the Gasification Process: The Example of Polish Deposits," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Krzysztof M. Czajka, 2021. "Gasification of Coal by CO 2 : The Impact of the Heat Transfer Limitation on the Progress, Reaction Rate and Kinetics of the Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Elsaddik, Majd & Nzihou, Ange & Delmas, Michel & Delmas, Guo-Hua, 2023. "Steam gasification of cellulose pulp char: Insights on experimental and kinetic study with a focus on the role of Silicon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    20. Zhang, Fan & Xu, Deping & Wang, Yonggang & Argyle, Morris D. & Fan, Maohong, 2015. "CO2 gasification of Powder River Basin coal catalyzed by a cost-effective and environmentally friendly iron catalyst," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 295-305.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:211:y:2018:i:c:p:582-589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.