IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v203y2017icp897-916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the potential of tree-based ensemble methods in solar radiation modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan, Muhammed A.
  • Khalil, A.
  • Kaseb, S.
  • Kassem, M.A.

Abstract

This article provides the first comprehensive study to explore the potential of tree-based ensemble methods in modeling solar radiation. Gradient boosting, bagging and random forest (RF) models have been developed for estimating global, diffuse and normal radiation components in daily and hourly time-scales. The developed ensemble models have been compared to their corresponding multi-layer perceptron (MLP), support vector regression (SVR) and decision tree (DT) models. The results show that the suggested techniques are very reliable and accurate, despite being relatively simple. The average validation coefficients of determination (R2) for boosting, bagging and RF algorithms are (0.957, 0.971, 0.967) for the global irradiation model, (0.768, 0.786, 0.791) for the diffuse irradiation model, (0.769, 0.785, 0.792) for the normal irradiation model, (0.852, 0.890, 0.883) for the hourly global irradiance model, (0.778, 0.869, 0.853) for the diffuse irradiance model, and (0.797, 0.897, 0.880) for the normal irradiance model. In general, the bagging and RF algorithms showed better estimates than gradient boosting. However, the gradient boosting algorithm was the most stable with maximum increase of 10.32% in the test root mean square error, compared to 41.3% for the MLP algorithm. The SVR algorithm offers the best combination of stability and prediction accuracy. Nevertheless, its computational costs are up to 39 times the computational costs of ensemble methods. The new ensemble methods have been recommended for generating synthetic radiation data to be used for simulating and evaluating the performance of different solar energy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan, Muhammed A. & Khalil, A. & Kaseb, S. & Kassem, M.A., 2017. "Exploring the potential of tree-based ensemble methods in solar radiation modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 897-916.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:203:y:2017:i:c:p:897-916
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917308437
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hussain, Sajid & Al-Alili, Ali, 2016. "A new approach for model validation in solar radiation using wavelet, phase and frequency coherence analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 639-649.
    2. Kumar, Rajesh & Aggarwal, R.K. & Sharma, J.D., 2015. "Comparison of regression and artificial neural network models for estimation of global solar radiations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1294-1299.
    3. Voyant, Cyril & Notton, Gilles & Kalogirou, Soteris & Nivet, Marie-Laure & Paoli, Christophe & Motte, Fabrice & Fouilloy, Alexis, 2017. "Machine learning methods for solar radiation forecasting: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 569-582.
    4. Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Mohammadi, Kasra & Yee, Por Lip & Petković, Dalibor & Mostafaeipour, Ali, 2015. "A comparative evaluation for identifying the suitability of extreme learning machine to predict horizontal global solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1031-1042.
    5. Almorox, J. & Hontoria, C. & Benito, M., 2011. "Models for obtaining daily global solar radiation with measured air temperature data in Madrid (Spain)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1703-1709, May.
    6. Amrouche, Badia & Le Pivert, Xavier, 2014. "Artificial neural network based daily local forecasting for global solar radiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 333-341.
    7. Senkal, Ozan & Kuleli, Tuncay, 2009. "Estimation of solar radiation over Turkey using artificial neural network and satellite data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 1222-1228, July.
    8. Jacovides, C.P. & Tymvios, F.S. & Assimakopoulos, V.D. & Kaltsounides, N.A., 2006. "Comparative study of various correlations in estimating hourly diffuse fraction of global solar radiation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 2492-2504.
    9. Linares-Rodriguez, Alvaro & Quesada-Ruiz, Samuel & Pozo-Vazquez, David & Tovar-Pescador, Joaquin, 2015. "An evolutionary artificial neural network ensemble model for estimating hourly direct normal irradiances from meteosat imagery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 264-273.
    10. Huang, Jing & Perry, Matthew, 2016. "A semi-empirical approach using gradient boosting and k-nearest neighbors regression for GEFCom2014 probabilistic solar power forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 1081-1086.
    11. Huang, Jing & Troccoli, Alberto & Coppin, Peter, 2014. "An analytical comparison of four approaches to modelling the daily variability of solar irradiance using meteorological records," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 195-202.
    12. Hassan, Gasser E. & Youssef, M. Elsayed & Mohamed, Zahraa E. & Ali, Mohamed A. & Hanafy, Ahmed A., 2016. "New Temperature-based Models for Predicting Global Solar Radiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 437-450.
    13. Li, Huashan & Ma, Weibin & Lian, Yongwang & Wang, Xianlong, 2010. "Estimating daily global solar radiation by day of year in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(10), pages 3011-3017, October.
    14. Hassan, Muhammed A. & Khalil, A. & Kaseb, S. & Kassem, M.A., 2017. "Potential of four different machine-learning algorithms in modeling daily global solar radiation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 52-62.
    15. Olatomiwa, Lanre & Mekhilef, Saad & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Petković, Dalibor, 2015. "Adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach for solar radiation prediction in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1784-1791.
    16. Besharat, Fariba & Dehghan, Ali A. & Faghih, Ahmad R., 2013. "Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: A review and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 798-821.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jianyuan & Zhao, Li & Deng, Shuai & Xu, Weicong & Zhang, Ying, 2017. "A critical review of the models used to estimate solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 314-329.
    2. Rohani, Abbas & Taki, Morteza & Abdollahpour, Masoumeh, 2018. "A novel soft computing model (Gaussian process regression with K-fold cross validation) for daily and monthly solar radiation forecasting (Part: I)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 411-422.
    3. Hassan, Gasser E. & Youssef, M. Elsayed & Mohamed, Zahraa E. & Ali, Mohamed A. & Hanafy, Ahmed A., 2016. "New Temperature-based Models for Predicting Global Solar Radiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 437-450.
    4. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Zeng, Wenzhi & Wang, Xiukang & Zou, Haiyang, 2019. "Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 186-212.
    5. Mohamed A. Ali & Ashraf Elsayed & Islam Elkabani & Mohammad Akrami & M. Elsayed Youssef & Gasser E. Hassan, 2023. "Optimizing Artificial Neural Networks for the Accurate Prediction of Global Solar Radiation: A Performance Comparison with Conventional Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-30, August.
    6. Wang, Lunche & Kisi, Ozgur & Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad & Salazar, Germán Ariel & Zhu, Zhongmin & Gong, Wei, 2016. "Solar radiation prediction using different techniques: model evaluation and comparison," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 384-397.
    7. Li, Shuai & Ma, Hongjie & Li, Weiyi, 2017. "Typical solar radiation year construction using k-means clustering and discrete-time Markov chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 720-731.
    8. Baser, Furkan & Demirhan, Haydar, 2017. "A fuzzy regression with support vector machine approach to the estimation of horizontal global solar radiation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 229-240.
    9. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Mert, Cihan & Kisi, Ozgur, 2018. "Comparison of four heuristic regression techniques in solar radiation modeling: Kriging method vs RSM, MARS and M5 model tree," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 330-341.
    10. Jahani, Babak & Dinpashoh, Y. & Raisi Nafchi, Atefeh, 2017. "Evaluation and development of empirical models for estimating daily solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 878-891.
    11. Rodrigues, Eugénio & Gomes, Álvaro & Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues & Henggeler Antunes, Carlos, 2018. "Estimation of renewable energy and built environment-related variables using neural networks – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 959-988.
    12. Kambezidis, H.D. & Psiloglou, B.E. & Karagiannis, D. & Dumka, U.C. & Kaskaoutis, D.G., 2017. "Meteorological Radiation Model (MRM v6.1): Improvements in diffuse radiation estimates and a new approach for implementation of cloud products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 616-637.
    13. Zang, Haixiang & Cheng, Lilin & Ding, Tao & Cheung, Kwok W. & Wang, Miaomiao & Wei, Zhinong & Sun, Guoqiang, 2019. "Estimation and validation of daily global solar radiation by day of the year-based models for different climates in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 984-1003.
    14. Hussain, Sajid & AlAlili, Ali, 2017. "A hybrid solar radiation modeling approach using wavelet multiresolution analysis and artificial neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 540-550.
    15. Halabi, Laith M. & Mekhilef, Saad & Hossain, Monowar, 2018. "Performance evaluation of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system models for predicting monthly global solar radiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 247-261.
    16. Mohamed A. Ali & Ashraf Elsayed & Islam Elkabani & Mohammad Akrami & M. Elsayed Youssef & Gasser E. Hassan, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence-Based Improvement of Empirical Methods for Accurate Global Solar Radiation Forecast: Development and Comparative Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-42, August.
    17. Bikhtiyar Ameen & Heiko Balzter & Claire Jarvis & James Wheeler, 2019. "Modelling Hourly Global Horizontal Irradiance from Satellite-Derived Datasets and Climate Variables as New Inputs with Artificial Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, January.
    18. Makade, Rahul G. & Chakrabarti, Siddharth & Jamil, Basharat & Sakhale, C.N., 2020. "Estimation of global solar radiation for the tropical wet climatic region of India: A theory of experimentation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2044-2059.
    19. Furlan, Claudia & de Oliveira, Amauri Pereira & Soares, Jacyra & Codato, Georgia & Escobedo, João Francisco, 2012. "The role of clouds in improving the regression model for hourly values of diffuse solar radiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 240-254.
    20. Liu, Luyao & Zhao, Yi & Chang, Dongliang & Xie, Jiyang & Ma, Zhanyu & Sun, Qie & Yin, Hongyi & Wennersten, Ronald, 2018. "Prediction of short-term PV power output and uncertainty analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 700-711.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:203:y:2017:i:c:p:897-916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.