IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v190y2017icp1195-1206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of CO2 injection in shale gas reservoirs with multi-component transport and geomechanical effects

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Tae Hong
  • Cho, Jinhyung
  • Lee, Kun Sang

Abstract

Although research on CO2 injection in shale gas reservoirs has been focused for enhanced gas recovery (EGR) and CO2 storage, previous studies have not examined both multi-component transport and geomechanical effects. Therefore, this study presents new shale gas models for CO2 injection considering multi-component adsorption, dissolution, molecular diffusion, and stress-dependent compaction. Based on these mechanisms and data for Barnett shale field, a simulation model was constructed for CO2 flooding and huff and puff. The proposed model was used to examine the effects of CO2 injection to EGR and CO2 storage and various mechanisms. The results presented that CO2 flooding and huff and puff improve CH4 production by 24% and 6% respectively compared with no injection scenario. At the end of simulated time, the injected CO2 is stored as free, adsorbed, and dissolved states in proportions of 42%, 55%, and 3% respectively. To confirm these results, Marcellus and New Albany shale models, which have different reservoir properties, are generated and compared with Barnett shale model. However, in Marcellus and New Albany shale models, effects of CO2 injection are lower than that of Barnett shale model. Therefore, to investigate factors affecting to the efficiency of CO2 injection in shale gas reservoirs, extensive simulations were performed. Results of the simulation analyses show that natural fracture permeability, hydraulic fracture half-length, well spacing, and Langmuir constants are significant factors for EGR and CO2 storage. For the real applications, these parameters should be mainly considered. The investigations performed in this study present better understanding of CO2 injection processes to EGR and CO2 storage and they are important for optimizing the designs of CO2 injection in field applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Tae Hong & Cho, Jinhyung & Lee, Kun Sang, 2017. "Evaluation of CO2 injection in shale gas reservoirs with multi-component transport and geomechanical effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1195-1206.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:190:y:2017:i:c:p:1195-1206
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917300557
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Xi, 2011. "A review of physical modelling and numerical simulation of long-term geological storage of CO2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3557-3566.
    2. Weijermars, Ruud, 2014. "US shale gas production outlook based on well roll-out rate scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 283-297.
    3. Weijermars, Ruud, 2013. "Economic appraisal of shale gas plays in Continental Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 100-115.
    4. Yuan, Jiehui & Luo, Dongkun & Feng, Lianyong, 2015. "A review of the technical and economic evaluation techniques for shale gas development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 49-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Liang & Ning, Zhengfu & Wang, Qing & Zhang, Wentong & Cheng, Zhilin & Wu, Xiaojun & Qin, Huibo, 2018. "Effect of organic type and moisture on CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in kerogen with implications for CO2 sequestration and enhanced CH4 recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 28-43.
    2. Chen, Yuntian & Jiang, Su & Zhang, Dongxiao & Liu, Chaoyang, 2017. "An adsorbed gas estimation model for shale gas reservoirs via statistical learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 327-341.
    3. Andres Soage & Ruben Juanes & Ignasi Colominas & Luis Cueto-Felgueroso, 2024. "Optimization of Financial Indicators in Shale-Gas Wells Combining Numerical Decline Curve Analysis and Economic Data Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Jin, Xu & Wang, Xiaoqi & Yan, Weipeng & Meng, Siwei & Liu, Xiaodan & Jiao, Hang & Su, Ling & Zhu, Rukai & Liu, He & Li, Jianming, 2019. "Exploration and casting of large scale microscopic pathways for shale using electrodeposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 32-39.
    5. Wang, Sen & Qin, Chaoxu & Feng, Qihong & Javadpour, Farzam & Rui, Zhenhua, 2021. "A framework for predicting the production performance of unconventional resources using deep learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    6. Gong, Jianming & Qiu, Zhen & Zou, Caineng & Wang, Hongyan & Shi, Zhensheng, 2020. "An integrated assessment system for shale gas resources associated with graptolites and its application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. Zhou, Guangzhao & Guo, Zanquan & Sun, Simin & Jin, Qingsheng, 2023. "A CNN-BiGRU-AM neural network for AI applications in shale oil production prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    8. Middleton, Richard S. & Gupta, Rajan & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2017. "The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 88-95.
    9. Lee, Jui-Yuan & Tan, Raymond R. & Chen, Cheng-Liang, 2014. "A unified model for the deployment of carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 140-148.
    10. Yang, Run & Liu, Xiangui & Yu, Rongze & Hu, Zhiming & Duan, Xianggang, 2022. "Long short-term memory suggests a model for predicting shale gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    11. Yuan, Jiehui & Luo, Dongkun & Feng, Lianyong, 2015. "A review of the technical and economic evaluation techniques for shale gas development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 49-65.
    12. Weijermars, Ruud, 2015. "Shale gas technology innovation rate impact on economic Base Case – Scenario model benchmarks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 398-407.
    13. Huang, Jingwei & Jin, Tianying & Barrufet, Maria & Killough, John, 2020. "Evaluation of CO2 injection into shale gas reservoirs considering dispersed distribution of kerogen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Grecu, Eugenia & Aceleanu, Mirela Ionela & Albulescu, Claudiu Tiberiu, 2018. "The economic, social and environmental impact of shale gas exploitation in Romania: A cost-benefit analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 691-700.
    15. You, Junyu & Ampomah, William & Sun, Qian, 2020. "Co-optimizing water-alternating-carbon dioxide injection projects using a machine learning assisted computational framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Zhao‐Zhong Yang & Liang‐Ping Yi & Xiao‐Gang Li & Yu Li & Min Jia, 2018. "Phase control of downhole fluid during supercritical carbon dioxide fracturing," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 1079-1089, December.
    17. Sanna, Aimaro & Dri, Marco & Hall, Matthew R. & Maroto-Valer, Mercedes, 2012. "Waste materials for carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM) – A UK perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 545-554.
    18. Xie, Heping & Liu, Tao & Wang, Yufei & Wu, Yifan & Wang, Fuhuan & Tang, Liang & Jiang, Wen & Liang, Bin, 2017. "Enhancement of electricity generation in CO2 mineralization cell by using sodium sulfate as the reaction medium," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 991-999.
    19. Nguyen, Phong & Carey, J. William & Viswanathan, Hari S. & Porter, Mark, 2018. "Effectiveness of supercritical-CO2 and N2 huff-and-puff methods of enhanced oil recovery in shale fracture networks using microfluidic experiments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 160-174.
    20. Zhou, Junping & Tian, Shifeng & Zhou, Lei & Xian, Xuefu & Yang, Kang & Jiang, Yongdong & Zhang, Chengpeng & Guo, Yaowen, 2020. "Experimental investigation on the influence of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation time on the permeability of fractured shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:190:y:2017:i:c:p:1195-1206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.