IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i4p864-d1337927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Financial Indicators in Shale-Gas Wells Combining Numerical Decline Curve Analysis and Economic Data Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Andres Soage

    (Group of Numerical Methods in Engineering—GMNI, Center for Technological Innovation in Construction and Civil Engineering—CITEEC, Civil Engineering School, Universidade da Coruña, Campus de Elviña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain
    Department of Civil Engineering: Hydraulics, Energy and Environment, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Ruben Juanes

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
    Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

  • Ignasi Colominas

    (Group of Numerical Methods in Engineering—GMNI, Center for Technological Innovation in Construction and Civil Engineering—CITEEC, Civil Engineering School, Universidade da Coruña, Campus de Elviña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain)

  • Luis Cueto-Felgueroso

    (Department of Civil Engineering: Hydraulics, Energy and Environment, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

We present a methodology to determine optimal financial parameters in shale-gas production, combining numerical simulation of decline curves and stochastic modeling of the gas price. The mathematical model of gas production considers free gas in the pore and the gas adsorbed in kerogen. The dependence of gas production on petrophysical parameters and stimulated permeability is quantified by solving the model equations in a 3D geometry representing a typical fractured shale well. We use Monte Carlo simulation to characterize the statistical properties of various common financial indicators of the investment in shale-gas. The analysis combines many realizations of the physical model, which explores the variability of porosity, induced permeability, and fracture geometry, with thousands of realizations of gas price trajectories. The evolution of gas prices is modeled using the bootstrapping statistical resampling technique to obtain a probability density function of the initial price, the drift, and the volatility of a geometric Brownian motion for the time evolution of gas price. We analyze the Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Discounted Payback Period (DPP) indicators. By computing the probability density function of each indicator, we characterize the statistical percentile of each value of the indicator. Alternatively, we can infer the value of the indicator for a given statistical percentile. By mapping these parametric combinations for different indicators, we can determine the parameters that maximize or minimize each of them. We show that, to achieve a profitable investment in shale-gas with high certainty, it is necessary to place the wells in extremely good locations in terms of geological parameters (porosity) and to have exceptional fracturing technology (geometry) and fracture permeability. These high demands in terms of petrophysical properties and hydrofracture engineering may explain the industry observation of “sweet spots”, that is, specific areas within shale-gas plays that tend to yield more profitable wells and where many operators concentrate their production. We shed light on the rational origin of this phenomenon: while shale formations are abundant, areas prone to having a multi-parameter combination that renders the well profitable are less common.

Suggested Citation

  • Andres Soage & Ruben Juanes & Ignasi Colominas & Luis Cueto-Felgueroso, 2024. "Optimization of Financial Indicators in Shale-Gas Wells Combining Numerical Decline Curve Analysis and Economic Data Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:864-:d:1337927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/4/864/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/4/864/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramos, Sofia B. & Veiga, Helena, 2011. "Risk factors in oil and gas industry returns: International evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 525-542, May.
    2. Chen, Yuntian & Jiang, Su & Zhang, Dongxiao & Liu, Chaoyang, 2017. "An adsorbed gas estimation model for shale gas reservoirs via statistical learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 327-341.
    3. Hong, Bingyuan & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Shangfei & Chen, Shilin & Zhao, Changlong & Gong, Jing, 2020. "Optimal planning and modular infrastructure dynamic allocation for shale gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    4. Clark, Peter K, 1973. "A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 41(1), pages 135-155, January.
    5. A. Hacura & M. Jadamus-Hacura & A. Kocot, 2001. "Risk analysis in investment appraisal based on the Monte Carlo simulation technique," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 20(4), pages 551-553, April.
    6. Weijermars, Ruud, 2013. "Economic appraisal of shale gas plays in Continental Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 100-115.
    7. Yuan, Jiehui & Luo, Dongkun & Feng, Lianyong, 2015. "A review of the technical and economic evaluation techniques for shale gas development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 49-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gong, Jianming & Qiu, Zhen & Zou, Caineng & Wang, Hongyan & Shi, Zhensheng, 2020. "An integrated assessment system for shale gas resources associated with graptolites and its application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Huang, Liang & Ning, Zhengfu & Wang, Qing & Zhang, Wentong & Cheng, Zhilin & Wu, Xiaojun & Qin, Huibo, 2018. "Effect of organic type and moisture on CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in kerogen with implications for CO2 sequestration and enhanced CH4 recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 28-43.
    3. Jin, Xu & Wang, Xiaoqi & Yan, Weipeng & Meng, Siwei & Liu, Xiaodan & Jiao, Hang & Su, Ling & Zhu, Rukai & Liu, He & Li, Jianming, 2019. "Exploration and casting of large scale microscopic pathways for shale using electrodeposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 32-39.
    4. Kim, Tae Hong & Cho, Jinhyung & Lee, Kun Sang, 2017. "Evaluation of CO2 injection in shale gas reservoirs with multi-component transport and geomechanical effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1195-1206.
    5. Middleton, Richard S. & Gupta, Rajan & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2017. "The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 88-95.
    6. Li, Jing & Wu, Keliu & Chen, Zhangxin & Wang, Wenyang & Yang, Bin & Wang, Kun & Luo, Jia & Yu, Renjie, 2019. "Effects of energetic heterogeneity on gas adsorption and gas storage in geologic shale systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Wang, Hui & Chen, Li & Qu, Zhiguo & Yin, Ying & Kang, Qinjun & Yu, Bo & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2020. "Modeling of multi-scale transport phenomena in shale gas production — A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    8. Chen, Yuntian & Jiang, Su & Zhang, Dongxiao & Liu, Chaoyang, 2017. "An adsorbed gas estimation model for shale gas reservoirs via statistical learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 327-341.
    9. Wang, Ke & Li, Haitao & Wang, Junchao & Jiang, Beibei & Bu, Chengzhong & Zhang, Qing & Luo, Wei, 2017. "Predicting production and estimated ultimate recoveries for shale gas wells: A new methodology approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1416-1431.
    10. Brian Sing Fan Chan & Andy Cheuk Hin Cheng & Alfred Ka Chun Ma, 2018. "Stock Market Volatility and Trading Volume: A Special Case in Hong Kong With Stock Connect Turnover," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Jensen, Mark J. & Maheu, John M., 2010. "Bayesian semiparametric stochastic volatility modeling," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 306-316, August.
    12. Peng, Weike & Gao, Jiaxin & Chen, Yuntian & Wang, Shengwei, 2024. "Bridging data barriers among participants: Assessing the potential of geoenergy through federated learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    13. Liudas Giraitis & Fulvia Marotta, 2023. "Estimation on unevenly spaced time series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5-6), pages 556-577, September.
    14. Alexander Mende, 2006. "09/11 on the USD/EUR foreign exchange market," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 213-222.
    15. Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Hautsch, Nikolaus & Pigorsch, Uta, 2008. "Measuring and modeling risk using high-frequency data," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2008-045, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    16. René Garcia & Richard Luger & Eric Renault, 2000. "Asymmetric Smiles, Leverage Effects and Structural Parameters," Working Papers 2000-57, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    17. Cornelis A. Los, 2004. "Nonparametric Efficiency Testing of Asian Stock Markets Using Weekly Data," Finance 0409033, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Konishi, Hizuru, 2002. "Optimal slice of a VWAP trade," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 197-221, April.
    19. Michelle B Graczyk & Sílvio M Duarte Queirós, 2017. "Intraday seasonalities and nonstationarity of trading volume in financial markets: Collective features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Yeap, Claudia & Kwok, Simon S. & Choy, S. T. Boris, 2016. "A Flexible Generalised Hyperbolic Option Pricing Model and its Special Cases," Working Papers 2016-14, University of Sydney, School of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:864-:d:1337927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.