IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v185y2017ip1p56-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electricity markets evolution with the changing generation mix: An empirical analysis based on China 2050 High Renewable Energy Penetration Roadmap

Author

Listed:
  • Zou, Peng
  • Chen, Qixin
  • Yu, Yang
  • Xia, Qing
  • Kang, Chongqing

Abstract

The power generation mix are significantly changing due to the growth of stricter energy policies. The renewables are increasingly penetrating the power systems and leading to more clean energy and lower energy prices. However, they also require much more flexibilities and ancillary services to handle their uncertainties and variabilities. Thus, the requirements for regulation and reserve services may dramatically increase while the supplies of these services, which are mainly from the traditional thermal plants, remain almost invariant. This changing situation will cause higher regulation and reserve prices and impact the profit models and revenue structures of the traditional plants. How electricity markets are actually evolving with the changing generation mix? Can enough backup power plants be given adequate economic incentives and thus remained with the increasing renewables and the decreasing energy prices and productions? Can de-carbonization be fully performed in power systems? To explicitly answer the question, this paper uses a multi-period Nash-Cournot equilibrium model to formulate the evolution of power markets incorporating different types of generators, including thermal units, hydro units, wind farms, solar stations and energy storage systems. The price changes in the co-optimized energy, regulation and reserve markets, and the profit changes of various generators are studied. And the variabilities and uncertainties of renewable generation sources are considered in dynamically determining the requirements of regulation and reserve services. Based on the China 2050 High Renewable Energy Penetration Scenario and Roadmap Study, empirical analysis is performed to identify the impacts of the changing generation mix on electricity markets and power industry. The energy storage systems are specifically analysed and compared to reveal their impacts on the profit structures of various generators.

Suggested Citation

  • Zou, Peng & Chen, Qixin & Yu, Yang & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2017. "Electricity markets evolution with the changing generation mix: An empirical analysis based on China 2050 High Renewable Energy Penetration Roadmap," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 56-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:185:y:2017:i:p1:p:56-67
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916315045
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nahid-Al-Masood, & Yan, Ruifeng & Saha, Tapan Kumar, 2015. "A new tool to estimate maximum wind power penetration level: In perspective of frequency response adequacy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 209-220.
    2. Lin, Yashen & Johnson, Jeremiah X. & Mathieu, Johanna L., 2016. "Emissions impacts of using energy storage for power system reserves," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 444-456.
    3. González-Aparicio, I. & Zucker, A., 2015. "Impact of wind power uncertainty forecasting on the market integration of wind energy in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 334-349.
    4. RUIZ, Carlos & CONEJO, Antonio J. & SMEERS, Yves, 2012. "Equilibria in an oligopolistic electricity pool with stepwise offer curves," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2395, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Vivero-Serrano, Gustavo & Bruninx, Kenneth & Delarue, Erik, 2019. "Implications of bid structures on the offering strategies of merchant energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Kwag, Kyuhyeong & Shin, Hansol & Oh, Hyobin & Yun, Sangmin & Kim, Tae Hyun & Hwang, Pyeong-Ik & Kim, Wook, 2023. "Bilevel programming approach for the quantitative analysis of renewable portfolio standards considering the electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    3. Shahmohammadi, Ali & Sioshansi, Ramteen & Conejo, Antonio J. & Afsharnia, Saeed, 2018. "Market equilibria and interactions between strategic generation, wind, and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 876-892.
    4. Hugo Algarvio & Fernando Lopes & António Couto & Ana Estanqueiro, 2019. "Participation of wind power producers in day‐ahead and balancing markets: An overview and a simulation‐based study," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), September.
    5. Parlikar, Anupam & Truong, Cong Nam & Jossen, Andreas & Hesse, Holger, 2021. "The carbon footprint of island grids with lithium-ion battery systems: An analysis based on levelized emissions of energy supply," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Morshed, Mohammad Javad & Hmida, Jalel Ben & Fekih, Afef, 2018. "A probabilistic multi-objective approach for power flow optimization in hybrid wind-PV-PEV systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1136-1149.
    7. Sarfati, Mahir & Hesamzadeh, Mohammed Reza & Holmberg, Pär, 2019. "Production Efficiency of Nodal and Zonal Pricing in Imperfectly Competitive Electricity Markets," Working Paper Series 1264, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    8. Seneviratne, Chinthaka & Ozansoy, C., 2016. "Frequency response due to a large generator loss with the increasing penetration of wind/PV generation – A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 659-668.
    9. Sarfati, Mahir & Hesamzadeh, Mohammad Reza & Holmberg, Pär, 2018. "Increase-Decrease Game under Imperfect Competition in Two-stage Zonal Power Markets –​ Part II: Solution Algorithm," Working Paper Series 1254, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    10. Mestre, Guillermo & Sánchez-Úbeda, Eugenio F. & Muñoz San Roque, Antonio & Alonso, Estrella, 2022. "The arithmetic of stepwise offer curves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    11. Dávid Csercsik, 2016. "Competition and Cooperation in a Bidding Model of Electrical Energy Trade," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1043-1073, December.
    12. Işık, Cem & Kuziboev, Bekhzod & Ongan, Serdar & Saidmamatov, Olimjon & Mirkhoshimova, Mokhirakhon & Rajabov, Alibek, 2024. "The volatility of global energy uncertainty: Renewable alternatives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    13. Hu, Jing & Harmsen, Robert & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Worrell, Ernst, 2019. "Geographical optimization of variable renewable energy capacity in China using modern portfolio theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Paul Neetzow & Roman Mendelevitch & Sauleh Siddiqui, 2018. "Modeling Coordination between Renewables and Grid: Policies to Mitigate Distribution Grid Constraints Using Residential PV-Battery Systems," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1766, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    15. Narajewski, Michał & Ziel, Florian, 2020. "Econometric modelling and forecasting of intraday electricity prices," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    16. Ye, Lin & Zhang, Cihang & Xue, Hui & Li, Jiachen & Lu, Peng & Zhao, Yongning, 2019. "Study of assessment on capability of wind power accommodation in regional power grids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 647-662.
    17. Ismael Ahrazem Dfuf & José Manuel Mira McWilliams & María Camino González Fernández, 2019. "Multi-Output Conditional Inference Trees Applied to the Electricity Market: Variable Importance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Akpan, P.U. & Fuls, W.F., 2021. "Cycling of coal fired power plants: A generic CO2 emissions factor model for predicting CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    19. Kumar, Dipesh & Chatterjee, Kalyan, 2016. "A review of conventional and advanced MPPT algorithms for wind energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 957-970.
    20. Philip Tafarte & Marcus Eichhorn & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Capacity Expansion Pathways for a Wind and Solar Based Power Supply and the Impact of Advanced Technology—A Case Study for Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:185:y:2017:i:p1:p:56-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.