IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v122y2014icp216-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental and numerical analysis of gas distribution in molten carbonate fuel cells

Author

Listed:
  • Schenone, Corrado
  • Borelli, Davide

Abstract

Flow maldistribution through the cell package affects the efficiency of the fuel cells, thus limiting the reliability and the diffusion of such a technology. This subject is a key-point in the progress of the fuel cells, so deserving the greatest attention and the most thorough research. This paper faces the issue by evidencing the possibility to improve the quality of flow distribution through an appropriate design based on the use of numerical methods. In particular, this research deals with the gas flow rate distribution in a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) and with the effect on maldistribution of baffles inserted into the inlet manifolds. To this extent, an experimental set-up was built to analyze the flow field inside the cell: the test section reproduces full-scale inlet manifolds for the anodic and cathodic supply of a MCFC stack of 150 cells. Experimental runs covered start-up as well as loading conditions. Air was used to simulate actual flow conditions inside the fuel cell package, basing similarity on inlet Reynolds numbers equivalence. Gas flow rate distribution has been evaluated by measuring the exit velocity at the outlet of the experimental set-up, operating at different working conditions for both cathode and anode, with and without the presence of baffles inside the inlet manifolds. Uneven distributions were observed for high mass flow rates at the cathode manifold without baffle. For the anode, manifold flow distribution resulted acceptably uniform for all working conditions. The baffle improved the distribution for both cathode and anode manifold; particularly, sharp peaks of velocity observed for cathode in the absence of the baffle disappeared at all. Then, velocity and flow rate distributions were modelled by means of a 3D computer code. In order to validate the accuracy of the model, calculated results were compared with experimental data; as a result, their agreement was very good and suggested the opportunity of a manifold design based on a numerical approach. The numerical model was finally utilized to predict flow rate distributions for all working conditions, by taking into account the detailed actual geometry of the manifolds. Numerical analysis of flow rate distribution by means of specific indexes permitted to better understand critical conditions and the reasons of maldistribution. The model was finally used to analyze various design solutions and get a more uniform gas distribution of flow rates. Thus, the numerical modelling can be effectively used during FC plants’ design to analyze the flow distribution, by taking into account devices and systems in order to improve the uniformity of the distribution. In this way, the numerical modelling permits to avoid expensive and time-consuming experiments, and to optimize, with a limited effort, the manifolds according to the cell package characteristics and mass flow rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Schenone, Corrado & Borelli, Davide, 2014. "Experimental and numerical analysis of gas distribution in molten carbonate fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 216-236.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:122:y:2014:i:c:p:216-236
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914001251
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Varbanov, Petar & Klemeš, Jiří, 2008. "Analysis and integration of fuel cell combined cycles for development of low-carbon energy technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1508-1517.
    2. Wright, S.E., 2004. "Comparison of the theoretical performance potential of fuel cells and heat engines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 179-195.
    3. Stambouli, A. Boudghene, 2011. "Fuel cells: The expectations for an environmental-friendly and sustainable source of energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4507-4520.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haghighat Mamaghani, Alireza & Najafi, Behzad & Shirazi, Ali & Rinaldi, Fabio, 2015. "4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of an integrated MCFC (molten carbonate fuel cell) and ORC (organic Rankine cycle) system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 650-663.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keramiotis, Ch. & Vourliotakis, G. & Skevis, G. & Founti, M.A. & Esarte, C. & Sánchez, N.E. & Millera, A. & Bilbao, R. & Alzueta, M.U., 2012. "Experimental and computational study of methane mixtures pyrolysis in a flow reactor under atmospheric pressure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 103-110.
    2. Sharma, Monikankana & N, Rakesh & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass derived producer gas: Status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 450-463.
    3. Prateek Saxena & Panagiotis Stavropoulos & John Kechagias & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment for Manufacturing Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Wee, Jung-Ho, 2011. "Molten carbonate fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid systems as distributed energy resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4252-4263.
    5. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    6. Čuček, Lidija & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Kravanja, Zdravko, 2012. "Total footprints-based multi-criteria optimisation of regional biomass energy supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 135-145.
    7. Meng, Kai & Zhou, Haoran & Chen, Ben & Tu, Zhengkai, 2021. "Dynamic current cycles effect on the degradation characteristic of a H2/O2 proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    8. de Wildt, Tristan E. & Chappin, Emile J.L. & van de Kaa, Geerten & Herder, Paulien M., 2018. "A comprehensive approach to reviewing latent topics addressed by literature across multiple disciplines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2111-2128.
    9. Radenahmad, Nikdalila & Azad, Atia Tasfiah & Saghir, Muhammad & Taweekun, Juntakan & Bakar, Muhammad Saifullah Abu & Reza, Md Sumon & Azad, Abul Kalam, 2020. "A review on biomass derived syngas for SOFC based combined heat and power application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Lu, Jun & Zahedi, Ahmad & Yang, Chengshi & Wang, Mingzhou & Peng, Bo, 2013. "Building the hydrogen economy in China: Drivers, resources and technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 543-556.
    11. Çalışır, Duran & Ekici, Selcuk & Midilli, Adnan & Karakoc, T. Hikmet, 2023. "Benchmarking environmental impacts of power groups used in a designed UAV: Hybrid hydrogen fuel cell system versus lithium-polymer battery drive system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    12. Matsuda, Kazuo & Hirochi, Yoshiichi & Tatsumi, Hiroyuki & Shire, Tim, 2009. "Applying heat integration total site based pinch technology to a large industrial area in Japan to further improve performance of highly efficient process plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1687-1692.
    13. Papurello, Davide & Lanzini, Andrea & Tognana, Lorenzo & Silvestri, Silvia & Santarelli, Massimo, 2015. "Waste to energy: Exploitation of biogas from organic waste in a 500 Wel solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stack," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 145-158.
    14. Christophe Coutanceau & Stève Baranton, 2016. "Electrochemical conversion of alcohols for hydrogen production: a short overview," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(4), pages 388-400, July.
    15. Ramiar, A. & Mahmoudi, A.H. & Esmaili, Q. & Abdollahzadeh, M., 2016. "Influence of cathode flow pulsation on performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with interdigitated gas distributors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 206-217.
    16. Wee, Jung-Ho, 2010. "Contribution of fuel cell systems to CO2 emission reduction in their application fields," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 735-744, February.
    17. Ahn, Seong Yool & Eom, Seong Yong & Rhie, Young Hoon & Sung, Yon Mo & Moon, Cheor Eon & Choi, Gyung Min & Kim, Duck Jool, 2013. "Application of refuse fuels in a direct carbon fuel cell system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 447-456.
    18. Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Tanveer, Waqas Hassan & Sayed, Enas Taha & Assad, M. El Haj & Allagui, Anis & Cha, S.W., 2019. "On the technical challenges affecting the performance of direct internal reforming biogas solid oxide fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 361-375.
    19. Jun Shen & Zhichun Liu & Fan Liu & Wei Liu, 2018. "Numerical Simulation of Water Transport in a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Flow Channel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Al Arni, Saleh & Bosio, Barbara & Arato, Elisabetta, 2010. "Syngas from sugarcane pyrolysis: An experimental study for fuel cell applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 29-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:122:y:2014:i:c:p:216-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.