IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v287y2023ics0378377423002949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of China's agricultural water policy reforms and production technology heterogeneity on agriculture water usage efficiency and total factor productivity change

Author

Listed:
  • Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan
  • Hao, Gang
  • Yasmeen, Rizwana
  • Yan, Hong
  • Shen, Jintao
  • Lu, Yuting

Abstract

China introduced the "agricultural water conversion policy" in 2012 to efficiently utilize agricultural water resources and improve production technology in different regions of the Country to increase sustainable agriculture production. To this end, for Policy impact evaluation, our study employed slack-based measure data envelopment analysis, Meta frontier Analysis, and the Malmquist productivity index to measure the agriculture water usage efficiency, agriculture Production technology heterogeneity, and total factor productivity change in pre- and post-agriculture water policy (2012) implementation in different regions of China. Data for 31 provinces and cities were taken for efficiency and productivity estimation from 2000 to 2020. Results revealed that agriculture water usage efficiency significantly increased after the policy implementation. The average agricultural water usage efficiency score for the 2000–2012pre–policy period is 0.6763, whereas the average AWUE score for the 2013–2020 post–policy period is 0.7522, showing an increase of 11.22%. Further results show that the eastern region maintains superior agriculture production technology compared to the western and central regions, with an average technology gap ratio of 0.8941 during the study period. The average total factor productivity change for the study period is 1.0769. Technological change is the primary determinant of productivity growth. There was a marginal decline in average Productivity change after policy implementation. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal Wallis test strengthens the study's results by providing statistically significant differences among different periods and regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan & Hao, Gang & Yasmeen, Rizwana & Yan, Hong & Shen, Jintao & Lu, Yuting, 2023. "Role of China's agricultural water policy reforms and production technology heterogeneity on agriculture water usage efficiency and total factor productivity change," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:287:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423002949
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423002949
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108429?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Nusrat Yaqoob, 2019. "The impact of technological advancement on total factor productivity of cotton: a comparative analysis between Pakistan and India," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Wang, Linlin & Wu, Wenyong & Xiao, Juan & Huang, Qiannan & Hu, Yaqi, 2021. "Effects of different drip irrigation modes on water use efficiency of pear trees in Northern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    3. Xu, Hang & Yang, Rui, 2022. "Does agricultural water conservation policy necessarily reduce agricultural water extraction? Evidence from China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    4. Hu, Yue & Liu, Chang & Peng, Jiangang, 2021. "Financial inclusion and agricultural total factor productivity growth in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 68-82.
    5. Emrouznejad, Ali & Yang, Guo-liang, 2018. "A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 4-8.
    6. Jinxia Wang & Yunyun Zhu & Tianhe Sun & Jikun Huang & Lijuan Zhang & Baozhu Guan & Qiuqiong Huang, 2020. "Forty years of irrigation development and reform in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(1), pages 126-149, January.
    7. Fei, Rilong & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Energy efficiency and production technology heterogeneity in China's agricultural sector: A meta-frontier approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 25-34.
    8. Jikun Huang, 2021. "Innovations in Agricultural Technologies in China," Springer Books, in: From Food Scarcity to Surplus, chapter 0, pages 83-135, Springer.
    9. Lu, Chengpeng & Ji, Wei & Hou, Muchen & Ma, Tianyang & Mao, Jinhuang, 2022. "Evaluation of efficiency and resilience of agricultural water resources system in the Yellow River Basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    10. Shahbaz Mushtaq, 2012. "Exploring Synergies Between Hardware and Software Interventions on Water Savings in China: Farmers’ Response to Water Usage and Crop Production," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(11), pages 3285-3300, September.
    11. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    12. Song, Zengzhen & Peng, Yuxing & Li, Zizhong & Zhang, Shuai & Liu, Xiaotong & Tan, Senwen, 2022. "Two irrigation events can achieve relatively high, stable corn yield and water productivity in aeolian sandy soil of northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    13. Mul, M.L. & Kemerink, J.S. & Vyagusa, N.F. & Mshana, M.G. & van der Zaag, P. & Makurira, H., 2011. "Water allocation practices among smallholder farmers in the South Pare Mountains, Tanzania: The issue of scale," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(11), pages 1752-1760, September.
    14. Shuxing Xiao & Zuxin He & Weikun Zhang & Xiaoming Qin, 2022. "The Agricultural Green Production following the Technological Progress: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, April.
    16. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    17. Zheng, Huifang & Shao, Ruixin & Xue, Yanfang & Ying, Hao & Yin, Yulong & Cui, Zhenling & Yang, QingHua, 2020. "Water productivity of irrigated maize production systems in Northern China: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    18. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    19. Wasi Ul Hassan Shah & Yuting Lu & Gang Hao & Hong Yan & Rizwana Yasmeen, 2022. "Impact of “Three Red Lines” Water Policy (2011) on Water Usage Efficiency, Production Technology Heterogeneity, and Determinant of Water Productivity Change in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Oliver T. Coomes & Bradford L. Barham & Graham K. MacDonald & Navin Ramankutty & Jean-Paul Chavas, 2019. "Leveraging total factor productivity growth for sustainable and resilient farming," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(1), pages 22-28, January.
    21. Shijin Wang, 2017. "Impact of FDI on energy efficiency: an analysis of the regional discrepancies in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(2), pages 1209-1222, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan & Hao, Gang & Yan, Hong & Yasmeen, Rizwana & Xu, Xiaowei, 2024. "Natural resources utilization efficiency evaluation, determinant of productivity change, and production technology heterogeneity across developed and developing G20 economies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Yang, Zhi & Kong, Tingting & Xie, Jiarui & Yang, Taiguo & Jiang, Yu & Feng, Ziqi & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "Appropriate water and fertilizer supply can increase yield by promoting growth while ensuring the soil ecological environment in melon production," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    3. Qixuan Zhang & Yuxin Yang & Xue Li & Pingping Wang, 2024. "Digitalization and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Tian, Guiliang & Wu, Xuan & Zhao, Qiuya & Li, Jiawen & Zhu, Mengqiu, 2024. "The impact of integrated agricultural water pricing reform on farmers' income in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    5. Mingze Du & Tongwei Zhang & Dehui Wang, 2023. "Can China’s Campaign-Style Environmental Regulation Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Ren, Yuning, 2024. "Unlocking the green potential through Fintech- natural resources, and economic development in resource-rich countries - An MMQR study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junlong Li & Chuangneng Cai & Feng Zhang, 2020. "Assessment of Ecological Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability of the Minjiang-Source in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Yin, Xu & Wang, Jing & Li, Yurui & Feng, Zhiming & Wang, Qianyi, 2021. "Are small towns really inefficient? A data envelopment analysis of sampled towns in Jiangsu province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Cheng, Gang & Qian, Zhenhua, 2011. "Dea数据标准化方法及其在方向距离函数模型中的应用 [Data normalization for data envelopment analysis and its application to directional distance function]," MPRA Paper 31995, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Zhang, Ning & Zhao, Yu & Wang, Na, 2022. "Is China's energy policy effective for power plants? Evidence from the 12th Five-Year Plan energy saving targets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Veronese da Silva, Aline & Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & Lopes-Ahn, Ana Lúcia, 2022. "Accounting multiple environmental variables in DEA energy transmission benchmarking modelling: The 2019 Brazilian case," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Francesco Sarracino & Kelsey J. OConnor, 2022. "A Measure of Well-being Efficiency Based on the World Happiness Report," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 43, pages 10-40, Fall.
    7. Kai Xu & Bart Bossink & Qiang Chen, 2019. "Efficiency Evaluation of Regional Sustainable Innovation in China: A Slack-Based Measure (SBM) Model with Undesirable Outputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    9. Suvvari Anandarao & S. Raja Sethu Durai & Phanindra Goyari, 2019. "Efficiency Decomposition in two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis: An application to Life Insurance companies in India," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(2), pages 271-285, June.
    10. Victoria Wojcik & Harald Dyckhoff & Marcel Clermont, 2019. "Is data envelopment analysis a suitable tool for performance measurement and benchmarking in non-production contexts?," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 559-595, December.
    11. Necmi Kemal Avkiran, 2017. "An illustration of multiple-stakeholder perspective using a survey across Australia, China and Japan," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 93-121, January.
    12. Zarrin, Mansour & Brunner, Jens O., 2023. "Analyzing the accuracy of variable returns to scale data envelopment analysis models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1286-1301.
    13. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Arabmaldar, Aliasghar, 2021. "Robustness of Farrell cost efficiency measurement under data perturbations: Evidence from a US manufacturing application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 604-620.
    14. Cao, Ting & Cook, Wade D. & Kristal, M. Murat, 2022. "Has the technological investment been worth it? Assessing the aggregate efficiency of non-homogeneous bank holding companies in the digital age," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    15. Moragues, Raul & Aparicio, Juan & Esteve, Miriam, 2023. "An unsupervised learning-based generalization of Data Envelopment Analysis," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 11(C).
    16. Arabmaldar, Aliasghar & Sahoo, Biresh K. & Ghiyasi, Mojtaba, 2023. "A generalized robust data envelopment analysis model based on directional distance function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 617-632.
    17. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2015. "Efficiency of the banking system in Vietnam under financial liberalization," OSF Preprints qsf6d, Center for Open Science.
    18. Liu, Wei & Zhan, Jinyan & Zhao, Fen & Wang, Pei & Li, Zhihui & Teng, Yanmin, 2018. "Changing trends and influencing factors of energy productivity growth: A case study in the Pearl River Delta Metropolitan Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-9.
    19. Camanho, Ana Santos & Silva, Maria Conceicao & Piran, Fabio Sartori & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco, 2024. "A literature review of economic efficiency assessments using Data Envelopment Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 1-18.
    20. Rafael Benítez & Vicente Coll-Serrano & Vicente J. Bolós, 2021. "deaR-Shiny: An Interactive Web App for Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:287:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423002949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.