IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v277y2023ics0378377422006382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal reservoir operation and risk analysis of agriculture water supply considering encounter uncertainty of precipitation in irrigation area and runoff from upstream

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Shuo
  • Kang, Yan
  • Gao, Xuan
  • Chen, Peiru
  • Cheng, Xiao
  • Song, Songbai
  • Li, Lingjie

Abstract

The precipitation in irrigation area and the runoff from upstream can reflect the natural and irrigated agriculture water supply situations. The wetness–dryness encounter uncertainty of precipitation and runoff, affected by the different microclimate in the basin, can lead to the potential water supply risk of reservoir dispatching, which poses a threat to food security. This study develops an innovative integrated modeling framework by coupling Copula joint distribution of precipitation and runoff, the reservoir multi–objective optimal operation model, and multi–criteria decision–making CECG–VIKOR method to assess agriculture water supply risk in the Baojixia Irrigation Area (BIA) of Northwest China. The results indicated that the integrated methodology is an important tool for assessing agriculture water supply risk, which has comprehensive, advanced, and efficient features. The correlation between the precipitation in BIA and runoff from upstream is weak, which can lead to a high uncertainty of the natural and irrigated agriculture water supply conditions. The Clayton copula was more suitable for estimating the joint distribution of precipitation and runoff. And there was a large probability of an unfavorable water balance situation in the BIA, with the extreme water shortage encounter condition of precipitation and runoff had the maximum joint distribution probability of 23.50%. The 9 scheduling schemes were set up according to encounter scenarios and whose optimal scheduling results are R104, R116, R66, R95, R5, R28, R117, R89, and R110, respectively. Among the 9 optimal scheduling results, the water supply risk in BIA increased with the decrease of available water supply and the increase of water demand. Below middle and middle water supply risk were mainly faced by scheme A and B with an occurrence probability of 62.47%, while scheme C had a high risk with an occurrence probability of 37.53% in BIA. The research results can provide a scientific basis for reservoir dispatching risk research and new ideas for making dispatching plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Shuo & Kang, Yan & Gao, Xuan & Chen, Peiru & Cheng, Xiao & Song, Songbai & Li, Lingjie, 2023. "Optimal reservoir operation and risk analysis of agriculture water supply considering encounter uncertainty of precipitation in irrigation area and runoff from upstream," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:277:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422006382
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422006382
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dariane, A.B. & Ghasemi, M. & Karami, F. & Azaranfar, A. & Hatami, S., 2021. "Crop pattern optimization in a multi-reservoir system by combining many-objective and social choice methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    2. Zhang, Yaling & Guo, Li & Liang, Chuan & Zhao, Lu & Wang, Junqin & Zhan, Cun & Jiang, Shouzheng, 2022. "Encounter risk analysis of crop water requirements and effective precipitation based on the copula method in the Hilly Area of Southwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Zengchuan Dong & Xiaokuan Ni & Mufeng Chen & Hongyi Yao & Wenhao Jia & Jiaxing Zhong & Li Ren, 2021. "Time-varying Decision-making Method for Multi-objective Regulation of Water Resources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(10), pages 3411-3430, August.
    4. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    5. Li, Mo & Sun, Hao & Liu, Dong & Singh, Vijay P. & Fu, Qiang, 2021. "Multi-scale modeling for irrigation water and cropland resources allocation considering uncertainties in water supply and demand," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Li, Mo & Guo, Ping & Singh, Vijay P. & Yang, Gaiqiang, 2016. "An uncertainty-based framework for agricultural water-land resources allocation and risk evaluation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 10-23.
    7. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2007. "Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 514-529, April.
    8. Ribeiro, Andreia F.S. & Russo, Ana & Gouveia, Célia M. & Páscoa, Patrícia, 2019. "Copula-based agricultural drought risk of rainfed cropping systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Gong, Xinghui & Zhang, Hongbo & Ren, Chongfeng & Sun, Dongyong & Yang, Jiantao, 2020. "Optimization allocation of irrigation water resources based on crop water requirement under considering effective precipitation and uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    10. Maleki, Tahereh & Koohestani, Hossein & Keshavarz, Marzieh, 2022. "Can climate-smart agriculture mitigate the Urmia Lake tragedy in its eastern basin?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. Zhang, W.J. & Tan, Q. & Zhang, T.Y., 2021. "A risk-averse stochastic quadratic model with recourse for supporting irrigation water management in uncertain and nonlinear environments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    12. Yang, Zhe & Yang, Kan & Wang, Yufeng & Su, Lyuwen & Hu, Hu, 2021. "Long-term multi-objective power generation operation for cascade reservoirs and risk decision making under stochastic uncertainties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 313-330.
    13. Jinping Zhang & Yong Zhao & Weihua Xiao, 2014. "Study on Markov Joint Transition Probability and Encounter Probability of Rainfall and Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in the Irrigation District," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(15), pages 5543-5553, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shaoyang Zhao & Mengxue Li & Xiang Cao, 2024. "Empowering Rural Development: Evidence from China on the Impact of Digital Village Construction on Farmland Scale Operation," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Chen, Lisa Y. & Wang, Tien-Chin, 2009. "Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 233-242, July.
    3. Kuang-Hua Hu & Wei Jianguo & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2017. "Risk Factor Assessment Improvement for China’s Cloud Computing Auditing Using a New Hybrid MADM Model," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 737-777, May.
    4. Maghsoodi, Abtin Ijadi, 2023. "Cryptocurrency portfolio allocation using a novel hybrid and predictive big data decision support system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Serafim Opricovic, 2009. "A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(8), pages 1549-1561, June.
    6. Ioannis Sitaridis & Fotis Kitsios, 2020. "Competitiveness analysis and evaluation of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a multi-criteria approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 377-399, November.
    7. Sirirat Sae Lim & Hong Ngoc Nguyen & Chia-Li Lin, 2022. "Exploring the Development Strategies of Science Parks Using the Hybrid MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, April.
    8. Zeynep Gamze Mert & Gülşen Akman, 2011. "The Profile of the Organized Industrial Zones in Kocaeli/TURKEY," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1137, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Haji Vahabzadeh, Ali & Asiaei, Arash & Zailani, Suhaiza, 2015. "Reprint of “Green decision-making model in reverse logistics using FUZZY-VIKOR method”," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 334-347.
    10. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    11. Saja Kosanović & Mirjana Miletić & Ljubo Marković, 2021. "Energy Refurbishment of Family Houses in Serbia in Line with the Principles of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Hsu, C.-H. & Wang, Fu-Kwun & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2012. "The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 95-111.
    13. Junling Zhang & Gajanan G. Hegde & Jennifer Shang & Xiaowen Qi, 2016. "Evaluating Emergency Response Solutions for Sustainable Community Development by Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Approaches: IVDHF-TOPSIS and IVDHF-VIKOR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, March.
    14. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Kao, Ya-Ling & Kuo, Szu-Yu, 2023. "Exploring the critical factors influencing the outlying island talent recruitment and selection evaluation model: Empirical evidence from Penghu, Taiwan," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Arash Malekian & Ali Azarnivand, 2016. "Application of Integrated Shannon’s Entropy and VIKOR Techniques in Prioritization of Flood Risk in the Shemshak Watershed, Iran," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(1), pages 409-425, January.
    16. Audrius Čereška & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ina Tetsman & Irina Grinbergienė, 2016. "Sustainable Assessment of Aerosol Pollution Decrease Applying Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, June.
    17. Namık Kemal Erdoğan & Serpil Altınırmak & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2016. "Comparison of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with respect to performance of food firms listed in BIST," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 5(1), pages 67-90.
    18. Lei Xiong & Cheng-Lein Teng & Bo-Wei Zhu & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Shan-Lin Huang, 2017. "Using the D-DANP-mV Model to Explore the Continuous System Improvement Strategy for Sustainable Development of Creative Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-37, October.
    19. Fu, Xin & Qiang, Yongjie & Liu, Xuxu & Jiang, Ying & Cui, Zhiwei & Zhang, Deyu & Wang, Jianwei, 2022. "Will multi-industry supply chains' resilience under the impact of COVID-19 pandemic be different? A perspective from China's highway freight transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 165-178.
    20. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:277:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422006382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.