IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v271y2022ics0378377422003274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The spatially-distributed ANN-optimization approach for water-agriculture-ecology nexus management under uncertainties and risks

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Youzhi
  • Guo, Xinwei
  • Zhang, Fan
  • Yin, Huijuan
  • Guo, Ping
  • Zhang, Wenge
  • Li, Qiangkun

Abstract

water-agricultural-ecology nexus system has spatial heterogeneous characteristics owing to heterogeneities of soil, crop, and weather types. Such complexes aggravate the difficulties in agricultural water, land, and fertilizer resources optimization. To address the above problems, this paper developed the spatially-distributed ANN-multi-objective multi-preference fuzzy credibility constrained programming (distributed ANN-MOMPFCCP) for optimizing water, land, and fertilizer resources. It incorporates the multi-objective programming (MOP), multi-preferences credibility constrained programming (MPFCCP) with the distributed ANN model, and has obvious advantages in improving the calculation efficiency of the traditional spatially-distributed crop simulation-optimization model. Besides, it can address uncertainties of the crop simulation model by introducing stochastic programming. It builds connections between food yields and agricultural ecological effects by introducing negative and positive ecological benefits in study system. Through proposed model, optimal distributed schemes considering spatial heterogeneous net economic and ecological benefit, and associated integrated risks can be generated. Optimal results show that water shortage risk occupied about 20 % of total risks, economic and ecological loss occupied about 20~20.2 % and 20~21 % of total economic and ecological benefits, respectively. Considering uncertainties of crop simulation model was a high effective way to improve robustness of simulation model. The model could offer insight alternatives for regional managers in measuring distributed agricultural-ecological benefit as well as making tradeoff among economic, ecological benefits and risks. Moreover, this approach can help manage multi-type resources under uncertainties, and provide multiple groups of Pareto solutions for managers, so that managers could select best management practices based on respective risk attitudes, and preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Youzhi & Guo, Xinwei & Zhang, Fan & Yin, Huijuan & Guo, Ping & Zhang, Wenge & Li, Qiangkun, 2022. "The spatially-distributed ANN-optimization approach for water-agriculture-ecology nexus management under uncertainties and risks," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:271:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422003274
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422003274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niu, Geng & Zheng, Yi & Han, Feng & Qin, Huapeng, 2019. "The nexus of water, ecosystems and agriculture in arid areas: A multiobjective optimization study on system efficiencies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Han, Congying & Zhang, Baozhong & Chen, He & Liu, Yu & Wei, Zheng, 2020. "Novel approach of upscaling the FAO AquaCrop model into regional scale by using distributed crop parameters derived from remote sensing data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Li, Jiang & Song, Jian & Li, Mo & Shang, Songhao & Mao, Xiaomin & Yang, Jian & Adeloye, Adebayo J., 2018. "Optimization of irrigation scheduling for spring wheat based on simulation-optimization model under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 245-260.
    4. Yu, L. & Xiao, Y. & Jiang, S. & Li, Y.P. & Fan, Y.R. & Huang, G.H. & Lv, J. & Zuo, Q.T. & Wang, F.Q., 2020. "A copula-based fuzzy interval-random programming approach for planning water-energy nexus system under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Rosa-Schleich, Julia & Loos, Jacqueline & Mußhoff, Oliver & Tscharntke, Teja, 2019. "Ecological-economic trade-offs of Diversified Farming Systems – A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 251-263.
    6. Mohammad S. Khorshidi & Mohammad Reza Nikoo & Mojtaba Sadegh & Banafsheh Nematollahi, 2019. "A Multi-Objective Risk-Based Game Theoretic Approach to Reservoir Operation Policy in Potential Future Drought Condition," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(6), pages 1999-2014, April.
    7. Xu, Xu & Jiang, Yao & Liu, Minghuan & Huang, Quanzhong & Huang, Guanhua, 2019. "Modeling and assessing agro-hydrological processes and irrigation water saving in the middle Heihe River basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 152-164.
    8. Wang, Youzhi & Guo, Ping, 2021. "Irrigation water resources optimization with consideration of the regional agro-hydrological process of crop growth and multiple uncertainties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    9. Li, Mo & Guo, Ping & Singh, Vijay P. & Yang, Gaiqiang, 2016. "An uncertainty-based framework for agricultural water-land resources allocation and risk evaluation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 10-23.
    10. Xiaoqing Zhao & Sinan Li & Junwei Pu & Peipei Miao & Qian Wang & Kun Tan, 2019. "Optimization of the National Land Space Based on the Coordination of Urban-Agricultural-Ecological Functions in the Karst Areas of Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Zhang, Chenglong & Li, Xuemin & Guo, Ping & Huo, Zailin, 2020. "An improved interval-based fuzzy credibility-constrained programming approach for supporting optimal irrigation water management under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    12. Baoying Shan & Ping Guo & Shanshan Guo & Zhong Li, 2019. "A Price-Forecast-Based Irrigation Scheduling Optimization Model under the Response of Fruit Quality and Price to Water," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruixue Wang & Jiancheng Chen & Minhuan Li, 2022. "Coupling and Coordinating Relationship between Agricultural Eco-Efficiency and Food Security System in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Zhaodan & Zhu, Tingju & Cai, Ximing, 2023. "Hydro-agro-economic optimization for irrigated farming in an arid region: The Hetao Irrigation District, Inner Mongolia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Wu, Hui & Yue, Qiong & Guo, Ping & Xu, Xiaoyu & Huang, Xi, 2022. "Improving the AquaCrop model to achieve direct simulation of evapotranspiration under nitrogen stress and joint simulation-optimization of irrigation and fertilizer schedules," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Chongfeng Ren & Jiantao Yang & Hongbo Zhang, 2019. "An inexact fractional programming model for irrigation water resources optimal allocation under multiple uncertainties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Wenjie Geng & Xiaohui Jiang & Yuxin Lei & Jinyan Zhang & Huan Zhao, 2021. "The Allocation of Water Resources in the Midstream of Heihe River for the “97 Water Diversion Scheme” and the “Three Red Lines”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Liu, Xiao & Yang, Dawen, 2021. "Irrigation schedule analysis and optimization under the different combination of P and ET0 using a spatially distributed crop model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    6. Gong, Xinghui & Zhang, Hongbo & Ren, Chongfeng & Sun, Dongyong & Yang, Jiantao, 2020. "Optimization allocation of irrigation water resources based on crop water requirement under considering effective precipitation and uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    7. Li, Jiang & Shang, Songhao & Jiang, Hongzhe & Song, Jian & Rahman, Khalil Ur & Adeloye, Adebayo J., 2021. "Simulation-based optimization for spatiotemporal allocation of irrigation water in arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    8. Ren, Dongyang & Xu, Xu & Engel, Bernard & Huang, Quanzhong & Xiong, Yunwu & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2021. "A comprehensive analysis of water productivity in natural vegetation and various crops coexistent agro-ecosystems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    9. Jiaxing Cui & Xuesong Kong & Jing Chen & Jianwei Sun & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2021. "Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Tang, Jiankai & Yang, Qiliang & Liang, Jiaping & Wang, Haidong & Yue, Xiulu, 2024. "Water management, planting slope indicators, and economic benefit analysis for Panax notoginseng production decision under shaded and rain-shelter cultivation: A three-year sloping fields experiment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    11. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    12. James P. Herrera & Jean Yves Rabezara & Ny Anjara Fifi Ravelomanantsoa & Miranda Metz & Courtni France & Ajilé Owens & Michelle Pender & Charles L. Nunn & Randall A. Kramer, 2021. "Food insecurity related to agricultural practices and household characteristics in rural communities of northeast Madagascar," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(6), pages 1393-1405, December.
    13. Yi, Jun & Li, Huijie & Zhao, Ying & Shao, Ming'an & Zhang, Hailin & Liu, Muxing, 2022. "Assessing soil water balance to optimize irrigation schedules of flood-irrigated maize fields with different cultivation histories in the arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    14. Zheng Lu & Yuan He & Shuyan Peng, 2023. "Assessing Integrated Hydrologic Model: From Benchmarking to Case Study in a Typical Arid and Semi-Arid Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Zhang, S.Q. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Ding, Y.K. & Yang, X., 2023. "Developing a copula-based input-output method for analyzing energy-water nexus of Tajikistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    16. Zhang, Chao & Xie, Ziang & Wang, Qiaojuan & Tang, Min & Feng, Shaoyuan & Cai, Huanjie, 2022. "AquaCrop modeling to explore optimal irrigation of winter wheat for improving grain yield and water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    17. Sponagel, Christian & Bendel, Daniela & Angenendt, Elisabeth & Weber, Tobias Karl David & Gayler, Sebastian & Streck, Thilo & Bahrs, Enno, 2022. "Integrated assessment of regional approaches for biodiversity offsetting in urban-rural areas – A future based case study from Germany using arable land as an example," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    18. Karner, Katrin & Schmid, Erwin & Schneider, Uwe A. & Mitter, Hermine, 2021. "Computing stochastic Pareto frontiers between economic and environmental goals for a semi-arid agricultural production region in Austria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    19. Mina Khosravi & Abbas Afshar & Amir Molajou, 2022. "Decision Tree-Based Conditional Operation Rules for Optimal Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(6), pages 2013-2025, April.
    20. Zuo, Qiting & Wu, Qingsong & Yu, Lei & Li, Yongping & Fan, Yurui, 2021. "Optimization of uncertain agricultural management considering the framework of water, energy and food," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:271:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422003274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.