IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v269y2022ics0378377422002347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A credibility-based interval multi-objective crop area planning model for agricultural and ecological management

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Junxu
  • Zhang, Chenglong
  • Guo, Ping

Abstract

This study presents a credibility-based interval multi-objective crop area planning model for agricultural and ecological management under uncertainty. The model is developed through the integrations of interval multi-objective programming and fuzzy credibility-constrained programming by considering economic and ecological benefits of the study system, and dealing with interval and fuzzy uncertainties. It focuses on crop area optimization with the interval objective function of maximizing the system benefits, maximizing the watershed area, and fractional interval objective function of maximizing the land productivity (i.e., system benefits per unit area). Additionally, the relationship between watershed area and ecological discharge is expressed as interval linear function, which is estimated by using interval regression analysis method. Then, the model is applied to a case study in Minqin County in the lower reaches of Shiyang River Basin for crop area optimization in view of the increasing shortage of water resources and the competition between agricultural and ecological water use. Optimal solutions for different scenarios can be generated based on fuzzy credibility constraints when the predefined credibility levels are set as 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8, 0.9, respectively. The results show that the crop area optimization model can better balance the regional agricultural and ecological benefits while ensuring grain production and promoting water saving. Moreover, a higher level of credibility corresponds to a lower system benefit but a larger watershed area. When credibility level is raised from 0.6 to 0.9, the upper bounds of system benefits are decreased from 13.87×108 Yuan to 13.81×108 Yuan whereas the watershed area is increased from 41.01 km2 to 42.12 km2. These various optimal results can help decision makers weigh system benefits and constraint-violation risks. Therefore, the results of the model can provide decision-making basis for the crop area optimization and provide valuable basis for the sustainable development in Minqin County and similar study areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Junxu & Zhang, Chenglong & Guo, Ping, 2022. "A credibility-based interval multi-objective crop area planning model for agricultural and ecological management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:269:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422002347
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422002347
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Chao & Xie, Ziang & Wang, Qiaojuan & Tang, Min & Feng, Shaoyuan & Cai, Huanjie, 2022. "AquaCrop modeling to explore optimal irrigation of winter wheat for improving grain yield and water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Li, Mo & Guo, Ping & Singh, Vijay P., 2016. "An efficient irrigation water allocation model under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 46-57.
    3. Shangguan, Zhouping & Shao, Mingan & Horton, Robert & Lei, Tingwu & Qin, Lin & Ma, Jianqing, 2002. "A model for regional optimal allocation of irrigation water resources under deficit irrigation and its applications," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 139-154, January.
    4. Chebil, Ali & Soula, Rania & Souissi, Asma & Bennouna, Bechir, 2022. "Efficiency, valuation, and pricing of irrigation water in northeastern Tunisia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    5. Zhang, Chenglong & Li, Xuemin & Guo, Ping & Huo, Zailin, 2020. "An improved interval-based fuzzy credibility-constrained programming approach for supporting optimal irrigation water management under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    6. Zhang, Dongmei & Guo, Ping, 2016. "Integrated agriculture water management optimization model for water saving potential analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 5-19.
    7. Ali Fazlali & Mojtaba Shourian, 2018. "A Demand Management Based Crop and Irrigation Planning Using the Simulation-Optimization Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(1), pages 67-81, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue, Qiong & Zhang, Fan & Zhang, Chenglong & Zhu, Hua & Tang, Yikuan & Guo, Ping, 2020. "A full fuzzy-interval credibility-constrained nonlinear programming approach for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Zhang, Chenglong & Guo, Ping, 2018. "FLFP: A fuzzy linear fractional programming approach with double-sided fuzziness for optimal irrigation water allocation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 105-119.
    3. Bao-Li Miao & Ying Liu & Yu-Bing Fan & Xue-Jiao Niu & Xiu-Yun Jiang & Zeng Tang, 2023. "Optimization of Agricultural Resource Allocation among Crops: A Portfolio Model Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Parkes, Martin & Jian, Wang & Knowles, Rupert, 2005. "Peak crop coefficient values for Shaanxi, North-west China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 149-168, May.
    5. Zhang, Cheng-Yao & Oki, Taikan, 2023. "Water pricing reform for sustainable water resources management in China’s agricultural sector," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    6. Balali, Hamid & Khalilian, Sadegh & Viaggi, Davide & Bartolini, Fabio & Ahmadian, Majid, 2011. "Groundwater balance and conservation under different water pricing and agricultural policy scenarios: A case study of the Hamadan-Bahar plain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 863-872, March.
    7. Luís Loures & José Gama & José Rato Nunes & António Lopez-Piñeiro, 2017. "Assessing the Sodium Exchange Capacity in Rainfed and Irrigated Soils in the Mediterranean Basin Using GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Liuyue He & Sufen Wang & Congcong Peng & Qian Tan, 2018. "Optimization of Water Consumption Distribution Based on Crop Suitability in the Middle Reaches of Heihe River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Sangha, Laljeet & Shortridge, Julie & Frame, William, 2023. "The impact of nitrogen treatment and short-term weather forecast data in irrigation scheduling of corn and cotton on water and nutrient use efficiency in humid climates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    10. Alexandra Tomaz & José Ferro Palma & Maria Isabel Patanita & José Penacho & José Dôres & Maria Natividade Costa & Elisabete Rosa & Alexandra Tomaz & Isabel Guerreiro & Manuel Patanita, 2017. "An Overview on the Use of Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers in Irrigated Mediterranean Agriculture," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 1(7), pages 1938-1940, December.
    11. Weiwei Shao & Dawen Yang & Heping Hu & Kenji Sanbongi, 2009. "Water Resources Allocation Considering the Water Use Flexible Limit to Water Shortage—A Case Study in the Yellow River Basin of China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(5), pages 869-880, March.
    12. Farshad Rezaei & Hamid R. Safavi, 2022. "Sustainable Conjunctive Water Use Modeling Using Dual Fitness Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(3), pages 989-1006, February.
    13. Zhu, Hongyan & Zheng, Bingyan & Nie, Weibo & Fei, Liangjun & Shan, Yuyang & Li, Ge & Liang, Fei, 2024. "Optimization of maize irrigation strategy in Xinjiang, China by AquaCrop based on a four-year study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    14. Wei, Jun & Cui, Yuanlai & Zhou, Sihang & Luo, Yufeng, 2022. "Regional water-saving potential calculation method for paddy rice based on remote sensing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    15. Elleuch, Mohamed Ali & Anane, Makram & Euchi, Jalel & Frikha, Ahmed, 2019. "Hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making to solve the irrigation water allocation problem in the Tunisian case," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    16. Abbas Amini Fasakhodi & Seyed Nouri & Manouchehr Amini, 2010. "Water Resources Sustainability and Optimal Cropping Pattern in Farming Systems; A Multi-Objective Fractional Goal Programming Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(15), pages 4639-4657, December.
    17. Farzad Emami & Manfred Koch, 2018. "Agricultural Water Productivity-Based Hydro-Economic Modeling for Optimal Crop Pattern and Water Resources Planning in the Zarrine River Basin, Iran, in the Wake of Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-32, October.
    18. Xike Guan & Zengchuan Dong & Yun Luo & Dunyu Zhong, 2021. "Multi-Objective Optimal Allocation of River Basin Water Resources under Full Probability Scenarios Considering Wet–Dry Encounters: A Case Study of Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Zhang, Ting & Zuo, Qiang & Ma, Ning & Shi, Jianchu & Fan, Yuchuan & Wu, Xun & Wang, Lichun & Xue, Xuzhang & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2023. "Optimizing relative root-zone water depletion thresholds to maximize yield and water productivity of winter wheat using AquaCrop," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    20. Shannak, Sa'd, 2022. "Optimizing dynamics of water-energy-food nexus in a desert climate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:269:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422002347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.