IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v246y2021ics0378377420322526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Photosynthesis product allocation and yield in sweetpotato with different irrigation levels at mid-season

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Siping
  • Zhao, Lei
  • Sun, Ninghui
  • Liu, Qing
  • Li, Huan

Abstract

Soil water deficit is one of the important factors affecting the source–sink balance of sweetpotato at mid-season growth (storage root initiation period). However, water regulation at mid-season sweetpotato growth is often ignored. In this study, field trials were conducted to diagnose leaves in the middle of sweetpotato growth, and then three mid-season irrigation levels (CK: 0 m3/hm2; W1: 150 m3/hm2; W2: 300 m3/hm2) were established. The effects of different irrigation levels on photosynthetic physiological indexes, 13C transfer allocation, and yield of sweetpotato were studied. The results revealed that mid-season irrigation significantly increased the relative moisture content of sweetpotato leaves, maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) (P < 0.05), which effectively alleviated the effects of soil water deficit. The Pn values with irrigation treatments W1 and W2 were significantly higher than those with control (CK) treatment in all three study periods. Among these, the W2 treatment had the highest Pn at 70 d, an increase of 113.4% compared with CK in 2019 test, and W1 had the highest Pn at 110 d and 150 d (P < 0.05). The trend of stomatal conductance (Gs) was basically consistent with Pn. The transpiration rate (Tr) of W2 was the highest at 70 d, an increase of 59.8–69.7% compared with CK, but the Tr of W1 was the highest at 110 d and 150 d. The 13C total accumulation in the W1 treatment was the highest at 70 d, 110 d, and 150 d, when it was 21.9%, 20.4%, and 33.1% higher than that of the W2 treatment in 2019 test (P < 0.05), respectively. The 13C allocation rate of storage roots treated with W1 was the highest in all periods, reaching as high as 73.1–76.1% at 150 d (P < 0.05). At 70 d, the 13C allocation rate of fiber roots and stems was highest in the CK treatment, whereas the 13C allocation rate of leaves was highest in W2 (P < 0.05). At 110 d and 150 d, the 13C allocation rate of stems and leaves in CK was the highest (P < 0.05). The biomass of W2 was the highest at 70 d, but the root-to-shoot ratio and the dry weight of root became gradually lower than those of the CK and W1 treatments at the late season, when they were reduced by 28.4% and 32.2% compared to W1 at 150 d in 2019 test (P < 0.05). The yield of W1 was increased significantly by 33.3–34.9% compared with CK (P < 0.05), but W2 only had an increased production of 14.5–20.7% (P < 0.05) compared to CK (P < 0.05). The irrigation water utilization efficiency of W2 was 59.4–61.8% and 39.1–43.5% lower than those of the CK and W1 treatments (P < 0.05), respectively. Together, these results validate the field sweetpotato mid-season water management model, which is of great significance for guiding actual production of sweetpotato and increasing the potential of sweetpotato.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Siping & Zhao, Lei & Sun, Ninghui & Liu, Qing & Li, Huan, 2021. "Photosynthesis product allocation and yield in sweetpotato with different irrigation levels at mid-season," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:246:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420322526
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420322526
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mulovhedzi, N.E. & Araya, N.A. & Mengistu, M.G. & Fessehazion, M.K. & du Plooy, C.P. & Araya, H.T. & van der Laan, M., 2020. "Estimating evapotranspiration and determining crop coefficients of irrigated sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) grown in a semi-arid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Ngigi, Stephen N. & Savenije, Hubert H.G. & Thome, Josephine N. & Rockstrom, Johan & de Vries, F.W.T. Penning, 2005. "Agro-hydrological evaluation of on-farm rainwater storage systems for supplemental irrigation in Laikipia district, Kenya," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 21-41, April.
    3. Zeleke, K.T. & Nendel, C., 2016. "Analysis of options for increasing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield in south-eastern Australia: The role of irrigation, cultivar choice and time of sowing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 139-148.
    4. Daryanto, Stefani & Wang, Lixin & Jacinthe, Pierre-André, 2016. "Drought effects on root and tuber production: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 122-131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Hui & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Liu, Wenfeng & Tong, Ling & Hao, Xinmei & Ding, Risheng, 2022. "The controlling factors of ecosystem water use efficiency in maize fields under drip and border irrigation systems in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    2. Hong, Tingting & Cai, Zelin & Li, Rui & Liu, Jiecheng & Li, Jinglai & Wang, Zheng & Zhang, Zhi, 2022. "Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on watermelon growth, photosynthesis and yield under CO2 enrichment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naba, W. & Moges A. & Gebremichael, A., 2020. "Evaluating the effect of in-situ rainwater harvesting techniques on maize production in moisture stress areas of humbo woreda, wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia," International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT), IJARIT Research Foundation, vol. 10(1), June.
    2. Araneda-Cabrera, Ronnie J. & Bermúdez, María & Puertas, Jerónimo, 2021. "Assessment of the performance of drought indices for explaining crop yield variability at the national scale: Methodological framework and application to Mozambique," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    3. Tomaz, Alexandra & Palma, José Ferro & Ramos, Tiago & Costa, Maria Natividade & Rosa, Elizabete & Santos, Marta & Boteta, Luís & Dôres, José & Patanita, Manuel, 2021. "Yield, technological quality and water footprints of wheat under Mediterranean climate conditions: A field experiment to evaluate the effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization strategies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Zhou, Hanmi & Ma, Linshuang & Niu, Xiaoli & Xiang, Youzhen & Chen, Jiageng & Su, Yumin & Li, Jichen & Lu, Sibo & Chen, Cheng & Wu, Qi, 2024. "A novel hybrid model combined with ensemble embedded feature selection method for estimating reference evapotranspiration in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    5. Adekalu, K.O. & Balogun, J.A. & Aluko, O.B. & Okunade, D.A. & J.W.Gowing & Faborode, M.O., 2009. "Runoff water harvesting for dry spell mitigation for cowpea in the savannah belt of Nigeria," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1502-1508, November.
    6. Daryanto, Stefani & Wang, Lixin & Jacinthe, Pierre-André, 2017. "Global synthesis of drought effects on cereal, legume, tuber and root crops production: A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 18-33.
    7. Martínez Alvarez, V. & Leyva, J. Calatrava & Maestre Valero, J.F. & Górriz, B. Martín, 2009. "Economic assessment of shade-cloth covers for agricultural irrigation reservoirs in a semi-arid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1351-1359, September.
    8. Ahmed Awad & Wan Luo & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Ahmed Elbeltagi & Mustafa El-Rawy & Hesham N. Farres & Mohamed EL-Sayed Gabr, 2021. "Farmers’ Awareness in the Context of Climate Change: An Underutilized Way for Ensuring Sustainable Farmland Adaptation and Surface Water Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Elbeltagi, Ahmed & Deng, Jinsong & Wang, Ke & Malik, Anurag & Maroufpoor, Saman, 2020. "Modeling long-term dynamics of crop evapotranspiration using deep learning in a semi-arid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    10. Belén López-Felices & José A. Aznar-Sánchez & Juan F. Velasco-Muñoz & María Piquer-Rodríguez, 2020. "Contribution of Irrigation Ponds to the Sustainability of Agriculture. A Review of Worldwide Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Teklewold, Hailemariam & Gebrehiwot, Tagel & Bezabih, Mintewab, 2019. "Climate smart agricultural practices and gender differentiated nutrition outcome: An empirical evidence from Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 38-53.
    12. Nyagumbo, Isaiah & Nyamadzawo, George & Madembo, Connie, 2019. "Effects of three in-field water harvesting technologies on soil water content and maize yields in a semi-arid region of Zimbabwe," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 206-213.
    13. Ning Wang & Yingying Xing & Xiukang Wang, 2019. "Exploring Options for Improving Potato Productivity through Reducing Crop Yield Gap in Loess Plateau of China Based on Grey Correlation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Matchaya, Greenwell C. & Tadesse, Getaw & Kuteya, Auckland N., 2022. "Rainfall shocks and crop productivity in Zambia: Implication for agricultural water risk management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    15. Zhang, Shaohui & Wang, Haidong & Sun, Xin & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Zheng, Jing & Li, Yuepeng, 2021. "Effects of farming practices on yield and crop water productivity of wheat, maize and potato in China: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    16. Hemalatha Palanivel & Shipra Shah, 2021. "Unlocking the inherent potential of plant genetic resources: food security and climate adaptation strategy in Fiji and the Pacific," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14264-14323, October.
    17. Hao, Shirui & Ryu, Dongryeol & Western, Andrew & Perry, Eileen & Bogena, Heye & Franssen, Harrie Jan Hendricks, 2021. "Performance of a wheat yield prediction model and factors influencing the performance: A review and meta-analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    18. Prasad, Pooja & Damani, Om P. & Sohoni, Milind, 2022. "How can resource-level thresholds guide sustainable intensification of agriculture at farm level? A system dynamics study of farm-pond based intensification," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    19. Su, Ming-Daw & Lin, Chun-Hung & Chang, Ling-Fang & Kang, Jui-Lin & Lin, Mei-Chun, 2009. "A probabilistic approach to rainwater harvesting systems design and evaluation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 393-399.
    20. Liu, Zebin & Yu, Songping & Xu, Lihong & Wang, Yanhui & Yu, Pengtao & Chao, Yang, 2023. "Differentiated responses of daytime and nighttime sap flow to soil water deficit in a larch plantation in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:246:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420322526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.