IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v243y2021ics0378377420310908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of the Hydroluis drainpipe-envelope system in a saline-sodic soil

Author

Listed:
  • Alavi, Seyed Abdollah
  • Naseri, Abd Ali
  • Bazaz, Azam
  • Ritzema, Henk
  • Hellegers, Petra

Abstract

Subsurface drains, when installed in non-cohesive soil, are typically covered with an envelope to tackle problems of clogging and siltation. Selecting a suitable envelope material, however, is complicated and depends primarily on soil characteristics in the area where the drains are to be installed. A new promising drainpipe-envelope concept, Hydroluis, has been developed which the designers claim works in a wide range of soils. The Hydroluis drainpipe consists of a corrugated inner pipe with three rows of perforations at the top and an unperforated outer pipe that covers the top two thirds of the inner pipe. We analysed the hydraulic and filter functions of this new drainpipe in a soil tank laboratory model with a saline-sodic problem soil from south-western Iran and compared Hydroluis performance with that of a locally-manufactured synthetic envelope material (PP450). The silty clay soil used in this study was 40 % clay, with a plasticity index (IP) of 16.9 and an exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) of 60.4 %. The Hydroluis drainpipe clogged during the first two weeks of the test due to invasion of the test soil into the space between the inner and outer pipes. Of the substantial volume of sediment that entered the Hydroluis inner pipe, 38 % removed from the pipe in the first day. In contrast, the PP450 drainpipe showed good hydraulic and filter functions, entering very little sediment to drainpipe during the entire test period and stabilizing at drainage rate of 28 mm/day and entrance resistance of 55 days/m, at around day 50. Our analyses suggest that the clogging and poor drainage function of the Hydroluis drainpipe was caused by the higher flow velocity (21.5 times higher) at the soil-envelope interface of the drainpipe, in addition to the lower Hydroluis drainpipe’s soil retention capacity (18 times lower) compared to the PP450 drainpipe. Assuming Stokes’ Law governs filter function, the results of Hydroluis design evaluation also suggest that in stable soils, very fine sand or coarser soil particles (D > 0.05 mm) place no serious limitations for Hydroluis drainpipe application, whereas the current design is unsuitable for filtering fine silt particles (0.002 < D < 0.02 mm). In conclusion, we suppose the Hydroluis drainpipe does not perform well in silty saline-sodic soils, such as those found in south-western Khuzestan Province, Iran.

Suggested Citation

  • Alavi, Seyed Abdollah & Naseri, Abd Ali & Bazaz, Azam & Ritzema, Henk & Hellegers, Petra, 2021. "Performance evaluation of the Hydroluis drainpipe-envelope system in a saline-sodic soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:243:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420310908
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420310908
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritzema, H.P. & Nijland, H.J. & Croon, F.W., 2006. "Subsurface drainage practices: From manual installation to large-scale implementation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 60-71, November.
    2. Stuyt, L.C. P.M. & Dierickx, W., 2006. "Design and performance of materials for subsurface drainage systems in agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 50-59, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghane, Ehsan & Dialameh, Babak & AbdalAal, Yousef & Ghane, Mohammad, 2022. "Knitted-sock geotextile envelopes increase drain inflow in subsurface drainage systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christianson, Laura E. & Hanly, James A. & Hedley, Mike J., 2011. "Optimized denitrification bioreactor treatment through simulated drainage containment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 85-92.
    2. Guo, Chenyao & Jiang, Xinman & Wu, Jingwei & Qin, Shuai & He, Shuai & Yang, Haoyu & Zhang, Rui & Yao, Chenzhi, 2024. "Risk evaluation for the combined clogging of subsurface drainage envelopes in arid areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    3. Zhe Wu & Chenyao Guo & Haoyu Yang & Hang Li & Jingwei Wu, 2022. "Experimentally Based Numerical Simulation of the Influence of the Agricultural Subsurface Drainage Pipe Geometric Structure on Drainage Flow," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Ritzema, H.P. & Satyanarayana, T.V. & Raman, S. & Boonstra, J., 2008. "Subsurface drainage to combat waterlogging and salinity in irrigated lands in India: Lessons learned in farmers' fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 179-189, March.
    5. Raats, Peter A.C. & Feddes, Reinder A., 2006. "Contributions by Jans Wesseling, Jan van Schilfgaarde, and Herman Bouwer to effective and responsible water management in agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 9-29, November.
    6. Ritzema, H.P., 2016. "Drain for Gain: Managing salinity in irrigated lands—A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 18-28.
    7. Xu Dou & Haibin Shi & Ruiping Li & Qingfeng Miao & Feng Tian & Dandan Yu & Liying Zhou & Bo Wang, 2021. "Effects of Controlled Drainage on the Content Change and Migration of Moisture, Nutrients, and Salts in Soil and the Yield of Oilseed Sunflower in the Hetao Irrigation District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Jouni, Hamidreza Javani & Liaghat, Abdolmajid & Hassanoghli, Alireza & Henk, Ritzema, 2018. "Managing controlled drainage in irrigated farmers’ fields: A case study in the Moghan plain, Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 393-405.
    9. Muhammad Ali Imran & Jinlan Xu & Muhammad Sultan & Redmond R. Shamshiri & Naveed Ahmed & Qaiser Javed & Hafiz Muhammad Asfahan & Yasir Latif & Muhammad Usman & Riaz Ahmad, 2021. "Free Discharge of Subsurface Drainage Effluent: An Alternate Design of the Surface Drain System in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Tao, Yuan & Wang, Shaoli & Xu, Di & Yuan, Hongwei & Chen, Haorui, 2017. "Field and numerical experiment of an improved subsurface drainage system in Huaibei plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 24-32.
    11. Salo, Heidi & Mellin, Ilkka & Sikkilä, Markus & Nurminen, Jyrki & Äijö, Helena & Paasonen-Kivekäs, Maija & Virtanen, Seija & Koivusalo, Harri, 2019. "Performance of subsurface drainage implemented with trencher and trenchless machineries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 957-967.
    12. Ritzema, H.P. & Nijland, H.J. & Croon, F.W., 2006. "Subsurface drainage practices: From manual installation to large-scale implementation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 60-71, November.
    13. Ghane, Ehsan & Askar, Manal H. & Skaggs, R. Wayne, 2021. "Design drainage rates to optimize crop production for subsurface-drained fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    14. Jeroen A. Veraart & Rianne Duinen & Jan Vreke, 2017. "Evaluation of Socio-Economic Factors that Determine Adoption of Climate Compatible Freshwater Supply Measures at Farm Level: a Case Study in the Southwest Netherlands," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(2), pages 587-608, January.
    15. Ritzema, Henk & Abdel-Dayem, Safwat & El-Atfy, Hussein & Nasralla, Magdy Rashad & Shaheen, Hanny Saad, 2023. "Challenges in modernizing the subsurface drainage systems in Egypt," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    16. Ki-Yeol Jung & Seung Ho Jeon & Se Eun Chae & Dong-Kyung Yoon, 2024. "Influence of Trenchless Subsurface Drainage with a Rice Husk Filling System on Soybean Productivity Under a Poorly Drained Paddy Field for Future Applications in Smart Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, October.
    17. Li Zhao & Tong Heng & Lili Yang & Xuan Xu & Yue Feng, 2021. "Study on the Farmland Improvement Effect of Drainage Measures under Film Mulch with Drip Irrigation in Saline–Alkali Land in Arid Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Singh, Ajay, 2019. "Poor-drainage-induced salinization of agricultural lands: Management through structural measures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 457-463.
    19. Ghane, Ehsan & Dialameh, Babak & AbdalAal, Yousef & Ghane, Mohammad, 2022. "Knitted-sock geotextile envelopes increase drain inflow in subsurface drainage systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    20. Mohammad Valipour & Jens Krasilnikof & Stavros Yannopoulos & Rohitashw Kumar & Jun Deng & Paolo Roccaro & Larry Mays & Mark E. Grismer & Andreas N. Angelakis, 2020. "The Evolution of Agricultural Drainage from the Earliest Times to the Present," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:243:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420310908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.